224
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago

Guess you should treat your workers better then.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

GM got 47 billion dollars via the stock swap and never repaid it.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

So a 100 day strike should roughly cover that.

Looks like ~~meat~~ involuntary profit sharing is back on the menu, boys!

[-] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 44 points 10 months ago

These companies have been doing so good lately with everyone only wanting trucks and SUV’s as there is insane markup on those types of vehicles. The companies can afford to pass along some of those profits to their workers.

[-] waraukaeru@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago

Trucks and SUVs are popular. But people do want economy cars-- they've just stopped selling them. These larger vehicles classify as light trucks and don't have the same fuel economy and emissions regulations as reasonably-sized cars. It's a big scam.

[-] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

People don’t want domestic economy cars. People who like domestic brands want trucks and SUV’s. People who want economy cars will pretty much only look at Honda/Toyota and both those manufacturers still make economy vehicles.

I have never once seen someone online recommend a ford focus or Chevy cruze to anyone. It’s always a carolla/Camry or civic/accord.

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I can't claim to come with an army but I'll recommend the Ford Fusion Hybrid all day long.

[-] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 1 points 10 months ago

I also had a friend recommend the Ford Fusion to me. It wasn't online, though.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

My cmax is great for what I need. The interior material and design is better than Toyota. Sure.the toyota interior might last longer but oh well.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

People don't want them because they have a rep for being terrible.

And yes I own a civic. A sedan is already more car than I need.

[-] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that’s kind of my point. Why would they keep making them when they have a rep of being bad and no one buys them? People want their trucks and SUV’s

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I find the best way to change your reputation is to change who you are. If you want to be seen as making a good product you should make a good product.

They had from the early 70s to get it together. Make economy cars that people wanted to buy. Instead they continue to make bigger and bigger fuel consuming monsters. Then every recession beg for government money.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

I really thought as a kid that a good quarter for a company meant a good quarter for its employees.

[-] menningeer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

The Big Three have profit sharing. From 2022 profits, GM employees received $12,750. Ford employees get $1,000 per $1 billion in North American pretax profit. Stellantis employees got $14,760.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

This is part of the ploy to continue that: get the employees to get pay from the union to carry signs for a few weeks. In the mean time they can sell what inventory they have at full price instead of discounts, and when inventory gets low enough they settle the contract and make more cars. there is probably some at GM who is looking at inventory levels (all those cars made in 2021 that didn't get chips), and will make an unreasonable demand if it looks like the contract is close to being settled.

This is why Just in Time is good: it forces companies to treat their people well so they are able to work when there is need.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 27 points 10 months ago

Seems like it they're that valuable, they deserve a raise and better benefits.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago

Why is it always framed as the employees costing money? Employers that come to agreeable terms don't cost the economy money.

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Corporate greed could cost them $5 billion in just 10 days.

If they collaborated with the auto workers, there wouldn't be an issue.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 10 months ago

Seriously, I'm a Capitalist (and a Classical Liberal) but why do these articles always talk about how much a labor action is going to cost a company but they never talk about how much the ongoing actions of the company have cost labor?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Because then anyone who criticizes how workers get hosed can be met with "YOU JUST WANT TO COLLAPSE THE HOLY ECONOMY!!!!"

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

That would defeat the purpose of stoking fear.

[-] RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

As a car salesman, this will cost me some money. As a guy who believes everyone should be in a union and have a goodpaying job, go get it boys. Shut it down for as long as it takes.

[-] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Alright, let's do this.

[-] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago

I hope basically everyone goes on strike. The workers don't even need to have any grievances, I just think it would be cool.

[-] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 13 points 10 months ago

Could cost a lot less if companies weren't shitheads, just saying.

[-] Electric_Druid@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I sure hope it does

[-] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Too bad so sad

[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Good! Solidarity with workers!

[-] Ryan213@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It's OK, we'll all pay for it somehow.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

The union backed Biden against then-President Trump in 2020, but it announced in May it would withhold its endorsement.

(That quote is from another story, because the CNBC site was being weird. https://thehill.com/business/4152444-5-things-to-know-about-a-possible-uaw-strike/)

I’m on the side of the workers, of course, but this pisses me off.

[-] nosurf@unilem.org 8 points 10 months ago

Why? Biden literally made it illegal for rail workers to strike

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 10 months ago

Right before a train derailed in Ohio and the feds allowed the cleanup crew to burn the toxic material leaving looming black clouds over the city for days.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It’s an emotional response, not a rational one.

[-] some_guy@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

What’s rational about a union supporting a president that made strikes illegal?!

[-] Addv4@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Especially strikes that were desperately needed.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
224 points (98.7% liked)

News

21706 readers
3686 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS