150
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Although the platform has explicit guidelines banning content that incites violence, a November article in The Atlantic pointed out at least 16 different newsletters with Nazi symbols, as well as many more supporting far-right extremism, leading to calls for change from many Substack authors and a refusal from leadership.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

Thanks for taking your time to do the absolute bare minimum, Substack!

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

After Casey Newton, founder of Substack tech news publication Platformer, flagged a list of publications violating content guidelines to the company, Substack says it is removing five.

None of the nixed newsletters have paid subscribers and, in total, account for about 100 active readers, according to the company.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

I saw. I would call "We removed five Nazis" the bare minimum.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

my substack was a Palestinian i only know because he is dead af now and ceased posting

[-] lunchymunchy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

way too little, way too late

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

I vehemently disagree. It's a terrible affirmation of their indifference to the harms that may come about as a direct result of content hosted on their platform.

Honestly, this is as close to inaction as they can get away with. So, unless the bare minimum is good enough for you, I strongly urge you to reconsider your position.

[-] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I mean, Substack lit all the benefit of the doubt I had for them on fire with their previous response.

This new action doesn't restore that, but all things being equal, I do want nazi shitheads to be de-platformed and have their funding cut off.

I think one can both acknowledge that they finally did a move in the correct direction and still think that they suck overall

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

They didn't, though. This is a PR move. They banned 5 people, none of whom had a substantial following. The popular Nazis remain. As I said above, they did the absolute bare minimum.

[-] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I agree with you; I think it is indeed the absolute bare minimum they had to do but I also agree with xc2215x that it's a good move. They moved from -100 to -99 on my shithead-o-meter scale

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Fair enough. Pretty sure I can agree with that!

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My impression is that Substack markets itself as a platform that refuses to censor unpopular opinions. In that context, hosting Nazi publications is, in a sense, a positive. If they're not even going to remove Nazis, they're definitely not going to remove you if you say something controversial.

It looks like many Substack authors don't agree, or don't think that safety from being deplatformed is worth being associated with Nazis, however tenuous that association is. Substack has to be careful to avoid a cascade in which respectable authors leave, which causes the reputation of the platform to decline, which causes more authors to leave, until pretty much just the Nazis are left. But Substack also has to be careful to avoid the opposite phenomenon, where any censorship will start a cycle of greater and greater censorship.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Being a Nazi is not just having an unpopular opinion and is not tolerable in any context

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

No, they are just into solar patterns and uncontrollable stretches of their hand from time to time!

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago

I need an explicit explanation of what this means.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Swastikas and seig heil throws. I was just ironizing about the presense of some controversial nazism you argued other person about. There's none. Nazism is bad by definition.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Gotcha. Sorry I killed your joke!

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Not at all. As a non-native speaker I often ask for explanations myself, and there are a lot of non-neurotypical people who don't pick the tone as casually as most do, so I don't see any problem (:

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago

It’s like that saying if there’s a Nazi at your bar, it’s now a Nazi bar.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Oh bullshit. Any healthy company should have no problem sorting "controversial opinions" from "far-right extremism that grooms domestic terrorists" and they're not going to get addicted to banning in the process.

Whenever I see these slippery slope arguments, the top of the slope always just happens to align with the views of the person arguing (or the views of the person they uncritically adopted their opinions from).

If Substack became riddled with CSAM, would you be in the comments patting them on the back? Because as we all know, deplatforming images of children being raped leads to deplatforming mask off neonazis before eventually leading to innocent Palestinians and LGBT users being banned too.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I always wonder why platforms that do this don't get used for good things. So many horrible governments out there. Why can't these platforms be full of people who live under those governments screaming for freedom and calling out corruption? Instead it is western basement dwelling Nazis planning school shootings.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
150 points (95.7% liked)

News

21721 readers
5172 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS