this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
890 points (94.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5475 readers
3244 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 94 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Damn i hate that word so much. What are they supposed to influence? They are advertiser, period. Influencer should be reserve for someone who actually contribute to the society, not some clown on tiktok/insta doing memes and jokes.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 51 points 9 months ago

They are called "influencers" because the ghouls that work in marketing realised that they are an extremely effective tool for their ongoing psychological warfare arms race

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Worst of all is that I don't even know how to find realistic reviews for things, like smartphones, anymore - all the reviewers seem to have become "influencers" and lie to your face like "people say that this happens, but I never saw it". Bullsh!t you didn't, when it happens to basically everyone:-(. (even if the phone manufacturer sent them a souped-up item that actually works, the influencer is still collaborating with them, knowing that that will happen)

It is easy to cure ignorance, simply with knowledge, but how do we get around misinformation now, without spending the time to become personal experts on every tiny aspect of life these days?

Late-stage capitalism sucks skibidi toilet :-(.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You're the third person I've heard mention skibidi toilet (my 9-year-old daughter and 12-year-old niece being the other two), and I absolutely refuse to educate myself on whatever the fuck that is.

[–] sour@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

is gen alpha thing annoying sibling is obsessed with

[–] SandmanXC@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Here you go: https://piped.video/watch?v=C0fQFFAml5o

Personally I think it's dumb and absurdist enough that it loops back around to funny. Plus it's fun to say.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like to keep up on modern slang so I can use it incorrectly on ourpose.

Nothing makes my niblings cringe harder than adults trying to be hip with the lingo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 9 months ago

Don't do it, it's not worth it, save yourself my dude! :-P

I hadn't heard it myself prior to like a week ago. However, now I can never go back to the blissful state of being that comes from not knowing that absolutely worthless piece of information.

Fwiw, it is a YouTube series of videos. Beyond that... it means literally nothing, just you either have heard of it or not. I did see that it got billions of views - but how many were bots playing it to run up the subscriber stats I have no idea:-P. Also, I remember a post talking about a bunch of highly strange new young-person-jargon words having been added to the Oxford Dictionary in 2023? Which is likely not this phrase, but somehow I conflated those two thoughts and now I can't unstick them in my mind:-P.

In this case though, I chose to use it anyway b/c the word toilet already conveys the requisite info, and the urban dictionary article about it is also funny in relation.

Or maybe, just maybe, the success of the phrase "skibidi toilet" is in itself proof that we are all enslaved to end-stage capitalism, where algorithms feed us what we do NOT want to see or hear, and yet what they think will make them moar profitz? :-) :-(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

They influence a horde of followers to buy shit or click ads. They're a middle-man for parasites.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's so strange to hear people calling themselves an influencer, like they're bragging about their ability to psychologically manipulate people (whether to sell the shit they're being paid to pretend to like, or just for good old power tripping)

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 13 points 9 months ago

That's why i hate that word so much. "I am/want to be an influencer" is such a weird phrase but it's an acceptable phrase for a lot of them. What do you trying to influence people with? Science? Math? Arts? Creativity? But no, it's purchasing choice.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago

I'd say you have that backwards

Influencer is the word companies use for people with a following, and therefore power over peoples buying decisions.

For some reason it's leaked and been misappropriated.

If you actually make something of value you are whatever that thing is, AND a potential influencer of buying decisions.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Many people who influenced me in my ways would punch the one who'd call them an influencer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 87 points 9 months ago (9 children)

My impression of the main microblogging sites has been:

Twitter: musk fanboys, celebrities and people who can't/won't switch

Threads: conservatives, alt-right, grifters and celebrities

Truth social: conspiracy nuts, maggots, alt-right

Mastodon/kbin: nerds, left-wingers and furries

Bluesky: furries, left-wingers and people who liked pre-musk Twitter

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 78 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You heard it here first, Lemmy is where the normies hang out.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 71 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy: Linux fan boys who will hear no wrong. Also the gays

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

🦀🦀$$11 a month🦀🦀

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy is 1000% not for normies. Not yet, anyway.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I'm not 100% sure what a normie even is, and I suspect there's a decent chance that makes me a normie.

And if yes.... we're heeeeeeeeerrrrre.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 17 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I don't want to gatekeep, but I'm really enjoying Lemmy without normies. It reminds me of the pre-2k internet. Nerds and weirdos just being themselves and celebrating each other's weirdness.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 9 points 9 months ago

Lemmy isn't really microblogging though.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

And tankies...

[–] callyral@pawb.social 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mastodon/kbin: nerds, left-wingers and furries

Being a Mastodon user does not make me a nerd, left-winger furry.

I mean,

I am a left-winger furry nerd,

But not because I'm on Mastodon!

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 2 points 9 months ago

something something correlation/causation

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel like at least 70% of the tweets I get on Bluesky's Discover page are from trans people.
I'm not complaining, it's just interesting.
I wonder if it's an algorithm thing (I follow some trans users) or if Bluesky is simply where they all fled to after the Muskening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Twitter has an annoyingly persistent hold out crew of lefties and furries as well. Which is a shame, because its cutting into the Bluesky/Mastodon content.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Completely agree. Use the nuclear option immediately to defend the fediverse from the sociopathic transnational corporation Meta.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't say that around here. You'll get a thousand sycophants down your throat bleating "It'S ThE uSeR's ChOiCe!!!!" and that you're "against free speech" and "just as bad as Meta" if you want us to disconnect from them.

I'm with you, though. Meta is evil and we should not be doing business with them in any way. Any user who wants to make the "choice" to do business with Meta can do it using one of Meta's many own products instead.

[–] sour@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

if is user's choice they can move

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 29 points 9 months ago

But won't somebody please think of those poor billionaires who want us to buy those things that they pay influencers to sell on Threads!? /s

Ironically one of the top things I cherish in life is not having to watch such ads, which is why I am not on Threads/Facebook/Meta/Twitter/X or even Reddit (except one sub that won't move here) in the first place.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
[–] crsu@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think social media was invented to cause revolutions

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Idk, man. If you look at countries currently experiencing lots of public uprisings and revolutionary organizing, they seem to be the ones with some of the least prolific digital media. Myanmar, northern India, and rural Bolivia all have terrible wifi.

Folks in "modern" nations like South Korea and Dubai and the UK are increasingly these NEET hermits with no friends or romantic partners or sense of collective good will who just fixate on online phantasm celebrities. Occasionally, one of them pops off and tries to murder a politician. But that's not revolutionary conduct.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Seems like it's easier to divide people who arr using social media.

If they don't have social media, they might go make friends, and those friends might have the same problems, and might seek to solve them...

[–] psud@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Won't it be more fun to downvote anything posted or connected by a user @threads?

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Great idea, let's start a fight against 1 billion monthly users with our 50k.

[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 5 points 9 months ago

I don't think they have downvotes for that matter.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›