this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
43 points (75.3% liked)

Games

32372 readers
1293 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MacedWindow@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I don't know why the text appearing as you scroll down thing became a trend but I hate it and hope it dies off soon

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

It reminds me of when Flash was an exciting technology and websites were made in Flash. Very painful.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I always assumed it was a way for them to prevent fully loading all the content until it’s actively being pulled. Perhaps it saves on some bandwidth?

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can see why you might think that, but that's not how it works. All of the text is downloaded up front, but is hidden initially. It is made to appear as you scroll, but it does not get the text via additional web requests. If you view the page source, or inspect element you can see it all there.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huh. TIL. So what’s the real reason then? Design choice? Then 🤮

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Someone, somewhere thought it looked cool and marketing people have been copying it ever since to make their site "pop".

[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It makes it look like a chinese vape website.

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Like just give me a city map like just that one thing, I literally cannot understand how they shipped without it.

[–] Frogster8@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Read the article, that's exactly what they are giving, it's astounding the scale at which people would rather output words than input them

Read it > Comment on it

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No shit, I was baffled when I found that out. I couldn't get more than ~12 hours into the game, ended up starting a new No Man's Sky file.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

When I found out that they had no way to relocate your ship automatically while on foot, or any kind of vehicle to drive, it was a non-starter. Everything Elder Scrolls 6: The Mün wants to be I can get better in Elite: Dangerous and NMS.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Keeping my fingers crossed they eventually sand off the rough edges and turn it into a halfway decent Skyrim in Space.

[–] Nahodyashka@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

They'll just wait and hope the modders make it playable lmao

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem is that the spice and flavour of Skyrim was not using the fast travel and just exploring.

With modding to add random encounters and roaming friendlies/neutral mobs, Fallout 4 was great too. Even more so recently with the flyable vertibirds so that you could get the in-game fast travel that used resources.

But neither of those can exist in a game where fast travel is a core and unavoidable gameplay mechanic.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

It's flaws can't be fixed with mods, you'd have to create new/restructure large portions of the gameplay loops.

[–] 9715698@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they can get past the engine limitations needed.

I still enjoyed playing through it, but Creation engine just can't handle such a grand scope in a manner gamers expect to play these days.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it's perfectly capable of being used to make a compelling game, but Starfield seems to be a game for which the strengths of the engine AND the strengths of the writers and designers at Bethesda are completely mismatched.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

It's a Bethesda game, so fat chance of that l.

[–] Lenny@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago

I remember when I got the steam notification that a developer left a comment on my review. I had left some other ones recently so I was excited, then I saw it was Bethesda telling me all the “fun things” I can do after I said it was boring. When I think about it it gives me that cringy awkward feeling you get when you’re embarrassed for someone else.

[–] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why does a single player game have this much telemetry and how do I turn it off?

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some of it’s kind of cool and makes sense. Like developers can get heat maps of where players die so they can see which areas need difficulty tuning, and it can also help developers understand where to spend resources on their games in the future, or notice if players aren’t engaging with something so they can figure out how to make that aspect of the game better. I have mixed feelings about it, but I don’t think telemetry has to be evil.

[–] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It should be clearly opt in, in my opinion. I don't believe it is here.

[–] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I agree with your stances but it's widely agreed among people who have to use the data generated that opt-in forms of telemetry are useless because of the way they skew results.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

Block the game at your firewall.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ugh who designed the page to have a gray background and gray text?

Give it some contrast, FFS. 🤦‍♂️

[–] konju376@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

This looks like an early internet "hey look at my cool blog" page

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They could have also put in an "days of player disappointment" metric to go along with the rest. What a shit game.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago
[–] BudgieMania@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Aaaah the Beowulf, the weapon that contributed to ruining my experience further. Not surprised to see it is the most used. The amount of ways in which that weapon was more convenient than anything else is ridiculous.
In semi-auto it hits almost as hard as anything else you can find, but you find it significantly earlier than most powerful things, and it shoots decently fast. It is very common loot so there is a big chance that you will come across one that is souped up, so you won't even have to modify it. It is flexible enough that it works at most distances. But...

But, but, but, there is something much much more important than any one of those things that makes it so that it is not worth bothering putting any effort into developing your arsenal beyond this weapon.
Do you know what is the most common loot from pickpocketing the extremely abundant security guards in the world? A loot considered so insignificant that you get a very high chance of stealing it even with relatively mid stealth and pickpocketing skills?
A bunch of 7.77 ammo.
Do you know what is is one the most common types of loot from the random bandits and pirates that you randomly kill by the bushload?
A bunch of 7.77 ammo.
Do you know what the Beowulf uses?
Exactly.

The game considers 7.77 ammo trash loot even though the Beowulf is a very decent performer. I had 1600 rounds when I came across the first decently souped up Beowulf. Why would I put any effort into using anything else? I ended up using that weapon for 75% of the game! What the fuck.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a you issue. If you wanted to use other weapons, you definitely could have. The game gives you ammo left and right, and it doesn't take long to build up a small stockpile of a bunch of different kinds.

I'm a sucker for energy weapons. It's a space game, and I wanna pew-pew some baddies. I got that double-barrel laser rifle and that's been my primary weapon for like 75% of my playthrough.

[–] BudgieMania@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It is not exclusively about the ammo, it's the combination of infinite ammo and the extreme versatility mentioned at the beginning of my comment. Of course you can use other weapons, but you don't really get a reason to because it is enough for every situation.

I don't understand the "you issue" thing when the statistics image linked here shows that the Beowulf was the most used weapon across all players. That's like, the most objective, empirical proof possible that it is not a "me issue"!