this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
351 points (99.7% liked)

Android

17400 readers
380 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 68 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah that’s because they can’t sell your location data to the police.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because they have to comply with lawful subpoenas for free.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But they could still sell it for money if they wanted to, that was my point.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If it's on sale the nsa probably bought it already to be honest

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

even if it wasn't, NSA would've probably bought it already anyway

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I could see them blocking it too maintain an exclusivity deal

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Stole. The NSA steals data from companies like Google. That's why, for example, everything in data centers and everything sent between them is encrypted.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And also because Google doesn't sell data.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Hahaha. That’s a joke right?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Do they sell data or sell services using data they collect? Honest question.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I believe generally not. They sell the results of processed data, but the data is their golden goose. Why sell it wholesale, when you can charge for every use of it?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's what I thought. So they do in a sense sell our data but not directly.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think they profile individuals and sell those profiles to ad companies, or in the case of google (ad company AND source of data) they pair ads to devices that fit a profile for the ad, like "rides a bike", "risk averse", "owns several cats" would be a profile for an ad selling cat bike seats that can hold 4 cats. That's one way of using the data but there are many more, each more nefarious than the previous one, I guess culminating with Cambridge Analytica, especially their African endeavours.

Btw is your username in reference to the band can?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Btw is your username in reference to the band can?

Yes it is! You're only the second person to catch that in my 6 months here.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

Google is the ad company. They don't sell their primary business advantage to competitors.

CA bought data from Facebook, not Google.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Where do I go to buy a list of your location history off Google if it's not true?

[–] cumberboi@beehaw.org 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok I just went down a very deep internet rabbit hole and went from believing google definitely sells data to it doesn't sell data to it sells data (kinda). I'd recommend this article on RTB's which explains how google advertisements actually work and how they leak your data (including your location).

I'd also recommend watching the short video by Brave linked in the article - I didn't understand the first part but the actual article explains it quite well, the end is the juicy part.

Hope this helps!

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That was quite informative! Thank you for the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If anything they'd be buying since they're the ones presenting ads... The whole data selling discussion online is always ridiculous. Who are these mystical data buyers ready to shell out billions for crappy "data" (does anyone participating in these discussions actually have a definition of what they think this ridiculously non specific ""data"" even is?) to present slightly better ads to users? Why would Google sell this data, shouldn't they want to keep it to themselves?

[–] Still@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

selling your data refers to people buying ads and being like I want to show my dog food ad to 100,000 people who have a dog, and then Google only shows the ad to people who have a dog

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

You don't kill the golden goose.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 61 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Use Organic maps and continue contributing to openstreetmap

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Have not heard of this but I'm looking into it now. Thanks!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah street complete ( the app mostly used to contribute to osm) is really cool and a lot of fun

[–] Vendul@feddit.de 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If you do crime, leave your phone at home

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah if you attend a protest, go to church or vote leave your phone at home.

Damn the world is getting crazy

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Where is the problem with going to the church?

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You've never seen The Kingsman?

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Likely not. Apologies for missing the reference, but I don't have a clue

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Look up "Kingsman church scene" or watch the movie. The scene is one of the best action scenes. Won't necessarily spoil the movie but will give up some info.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The government will know you went to church. That's pretty scary if you ask me. Church should be a safe place and having the government track you literally anywhere is concerning. Not to mention it opens up the door for people to be watched even more because they attended a church, mosque or something else.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, I. In this country I get more worried that I don't attend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Technically speaking, anywhere that your face/body/gait can be seen/analysed, is where you will be tracked. At this point, the most prudent thing to do is to completely divorce your online identity from your physical self.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 18 points 9 months ago

I feel like the vast majority of headlines about this stuff could use clarification of "without warrant."

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why bother with Google when they can just ask your telco.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Because that data tells them a lot less and requires a paper trail, which they don't like.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Telco doesn't have the same level of precision I think.

Yes and no

The Telco can say between what antennas you are. In urban areas with lots of antennas that's still pretty accurate to almost say what building. Especially with 5G the number of antennas and accuracy go upto in some cases centimeter/inch accuracy so better than GPS. That last case would be in a mall with small antenna in each corridor.

In rural areas with data switched off that's more like somewhere in that square mile, way worse than GPS.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

They can still access it locally, if Google wanted to protect people then they wouldn’t store location data

[–] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

How about the case where I explicitly want them to store my location data? I mean I really use and like that feature.

[–] lukini@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

I want them to. I opted in and use that feature.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

I'm using this feature and am looking forward to it becoming on-device.

Like Apple, Google also doesn't want competitors in collecting user data

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί