this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
970 points (79.0% liked)

Fediverse

28744 readers
75 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 272 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Israel have been successfully pressuring meta to remove and shadow ban accounts sympathetic to Palestinians. The level of censorship is crazy.

[–] raoulraoul@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (7 children)

OK, I'll bite. You got something more substantial than "I read it on the internet" to back that up? One reputable source on your accusation? Not sayin' you're lying/wrong, just asking for some verifiable proof.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Numerous actual popular accounts and news sources have been suspended. It was major news in the Arabic-speaking world in October. Meta even apologized for auto-translating Palestinian as “terrorist.”

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snek@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (14 children)

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 123 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

lemm.ee already made the decision, based off of the voice of the community to defederate from Threads

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy.Ca admins blocked Threads about 5 months ago: https://lemmy.ca/comment/901551

You can confirm that Threads dot net is still blocked by Lemmy.Ca by going to https://lemmy.ca/instances and clicking on the "Blocked Instances" tab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

please take a look at the replies under zuck's own post in threads.net and determine if that's the type of content you want.

for those who don't want to visit, majority of the commentators are bots. some advertising crypto, and others asking for money.

even if you think you can individually block those accounts, keep in mind the size of threads compared to fediverse.
for Lemmy: monthly active users are barely ~~150K~~40K, while for threads it's 100 million. there's no chance you can control that inflow of bots.

and if it still doesn't convince you, you can read threads' privacy policy, which states that they'll gather all that pii if you interact with their content.

most of the internet is already bigtech, I don't want Lemmy to become another arm of it. though I have faith in my instance maintainer and dessalines, the dev.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] capital@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Let users decide because we’re fucking adults.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Great thing about the fediverse

People get to decide what they want from their platform

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Then go join threads.net? Nobody's stopping you from doing that. That would put you on a server friendly to your beliefs.

Server admins also have opinions, and are not required to take a democratic vote and each individual user's choice into account. They can decide for themselves, and they will, for good or ill. If you don't like where it ends up, your user decision should be to fuck off to threads.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 96 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Comment stolen from user "copygirl" from blahaj.zone:

Looks like they'll be harvesting your data if you follow anyone from Threads, maybe even injecting ads. Unsure what happens to the data of people that get followed by a Threads user. A large part of the fediverse is here precisely because they want to escape corporate meddling, data-hoarding, advertising and other anti-user malpractices. There's a number of people talking about this, here's a recent post that highlights some of the things from their TOS.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] letsmakeafriendship@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (7 children)

In favor of defederation. If I start seeing garbage from threads in my feed, I'm switching instances. I don't want Meta pushing their divisive, hateful, misinformation all up in my feeds. Meta will kill fedi. We don't need them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

If anybody remembers XMPP being widespread and what Facebook, Google, Apple and others (say, I personally remember VK and Yandex in Russia supporting it) did to it, that's what will happen if you "wait and see".

EDIT: oh, half the thread is such comments

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Currently, I think there are two main branches of ActivityPub implementations: Microblogs(Mastodon and its forks, the microblog portion of kbin), which are user centric, and group based aggregators(Lemmy, Kbin, peertube, future Pixelfed), both of which are valid implementations, however, they don't really work well with each other.

So, I believe that the threat of Threads to Lemmy instances is really overblown for the simple reason that there is no way for a Lemmy user to browse microblog contents through federation to begin with, whether it be Mastodon or Threads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sho@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If anything meta integrates here I'm out.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's not defederate from every corporate player. Some of them can probably respect reasonable rules of civility.

But fuck Meta. We already know how this plays out.

We know there's a huge wave of hatred and misinformation incoming. We've seen it on their other platforms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rsolva@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We should avoid making blanket demands like this to the fediverse as a whole. I happen to support your position, but we should take into account the diverse nature of the social web.

Instead of making demands, explain your reasoning and leave each community to make up their own mind. This is the beautiful nature of the social web; we have broken decision making down into many smaller units instead of one mega instance/corporation.

Find a community that resonates with your own thinking on this issue, and over time a thousand different servers will gather experiences and a picture will start to form; was federation with Meta a good or a bad thing?

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There's a list of people that have agreed to block it at https://fedipact.online/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Creatortray@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Okay. I’ve seen stuff like this on both mastodon, and here, but i haven’t heard about them doing anything that would actually harm the fediverse. I guess i don’t know what the problem is. I know they’ve got a negative reputation, and for good reason, but isn’t that the awesome part of threads being federated? We can follow and connect to people there without being part of their system, and therefor not susceptible to their bs? If I’m missing something please fill me in.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (17 children)

It is inevitable that Meta will try to kill the fediverse while chasing profits, there is no other possibility in their endgame.

If that is pushing ads into other instances or killing those instances entirely we don’t know yet but it will happen.

It has to because the shareholders must always have more.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Dieinahole@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Just think:

Meta has literal billions of users.

The entire fediverse has about 1.5 million.

Less than a fraction of a percent.

Why in THE FUCK would meta notice, or care, at fucking all? The entire fediverse of traffic ported over to meta wouldn't budge their advertising bottom line.

But, it's a comparatively small group of smart people, having conversations, and profiles they don't have tabs and near total control over.

There's news about cop city and gaza I have seen here that I've seen NOWHERE else.

Don't let them control the narrative here

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Meta will be okay making money off lemmy indirectly for a while. Then, if they grow, they'll want more than a toehold.

When it's Facebook, trust that greed and power are the goals.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

0.19 allows users themselves to block instances...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] corbin@infosec.pub 30 points 1 year ago (12 children)

How about users make decisions for themselves and block Threads if they want?

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Threads' size will unaviodably disrupt the Fediverse if they federate fully, regardless their intentions. I think the appropriate approach is making interaction opt-in, like social.coop does: https://social.coop/@eloquence/111588877096843391

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›