this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
200 points (98.1% liked)

News

21860 readers
4151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The figures - gathered by a network of Afghan veterans - reveal the scale of what one former UK general calls a "betrayal" and a "disgrace".

The soldiers fled to Pakistan, which now says it will expel Afghan refugees.

The UK says it has brought thousands of Afghans to safety.

Gen Sir Richard Barrons, who served the British Army in Afghanistan over 12 years, told BBC Newsnight that the failure of the UK to relocate these soldiers "is a disgrace, because it reflects that either we're duplicitous as a nation or incompetent".

"Neither are acceptable," he said. "It is a betrayal, and the cost of that betrayal will be people who served with us will die or spend their lives in prison."

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago

Most of them will probably be arrested, tortured and killed. Fuck the UK!

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

I don't really see what this has to do with colonialism?

Pointing to any bad thing any country that used to do colonialism does and calling it colonialism seems silly to me.

In this case: the UK worked with and funded the training of these people. They fled to Pakistan after the US left Afghanistan. Pakistan wants to deport them and the UK is saying that despite working with and in some cases even joining UK ranks directly, that doesn't entitle them to stay in the UK permanently.

I can certainly see why you'd call that shitty, but where does colonialism come into it? I swear some people just hear UK and their mind turns to 1800s red coats or something

[–] obelisk@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I agree that the issue presented by the article is likely not related to colonialism. More so the disinterest in providing further security resources to the area.

A lot of the Middle East, including Afghanistan, has been affected by the colonial interests of the British Empire in the past. Albeit mostly in the mid to late 19th century and into the WW1 era.

I doubt I understand the nuances to make any claims that the prior issues are indirectly affecting the area currently, but I believe it is worth to note the relation as why it could be brought up in comments.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Country invades other country, installs friendly government, invader loses interest and local government collapses under insurgency. Invader leaves local allies hanging after they were done using them. If that's not a classic colonialist moment then I don't know what is.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight... you think Afghanistan was a UK colony?

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, arguably worse. Because if it was a colony the UK would have at least governed and invested in the country. Instead they came in, wrecked shit for a couple decades and left.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Right, so colonialism is when a country doesn't give residency or citizenship to people that fought alongside British forces, officially or unofficially.

You're shoehorning a completely unrelated topic into this.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Did you read the comment you replied to? I literally said it wasn't colonialism in that comment.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ok then, so you never really had a point.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My point is that it's worse than colonialism. Bruh. Holy shit lol.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Lmao

Not giving foreign soldiers citizenship is worse than colonialism. Christ.

Someone's never read a history book.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

I don’t really see what this has to do with colonialism?

What did you think the (so-called) "War On Terror" was really about?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe. Personally I'd just put it down to asshole leadership. Sunak is one of those.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Country invades other country, installs friendly government. That's colonialism, all the fallout from that is a consequence of it.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's not colonialism. You just saw the UK letting down some troops that worked with them and essentially went "when the UK does something wrong... that's colonialism"

Afghanistan was not a UK colony.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

True, it was probably worse. Because with colonialism the UK would have at least governed and built infrastructure and cr3ated businesses. In this case they just helped install a crony government, helped perpetuate a decades long war, and the whole thing collapsed as soon as they left leaving destruction in their wake.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's fair.

If gov'ts had focused on repairing/replacing the infrastructure the Soviets had demolished and rebuilt schools, mosques, markets, roads, etc instead of barreling in like a "great white savior" it would have been much different.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Honestly there was so much potential to do good. Both in Afghanistan and Iraq. But we came in with guns blazing instead of trying to understand and integrate local people into a thriving economy and government.

[–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's only slavery when there is a certificate issued by the government calling them slaves. Otherwise it's called

🌟 Sparkling Exploitation 🌟

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That's what you get for aiding Western colonialism. They leave you in the dumps after they're done with it. Same story every time. Recently the Kurds got screwed over. The Ukrainians are next in line to find out how reliable the west are as allies.

Elite soldiers should have done a little history lesson.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Never ever join or support a western military they will eat gou and spit you out

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Recently the Kurds got screwed over.

In their defense it was either that or fall to ISIS. As the US aided and abetted Saddam Hussein when he perpetrated his worst atrocities against the Kurds I sincerely doubt they ever expected anything else from the US.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Most of them will probably be arrested, tortured and killed. Fuck the UK!