366
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

James Somerton was making $170,000 a year with nearly 6 million views and 267,000 subscribers on YouTube, until...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 223 points 6 months ago

I mean the video didn't just "accuse" him, it showed actual evidence and a metric fuckton of it.

[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 60 points 6 months ago

Legal terminology

[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

hbomb also included a playlist of smaller queer creators that i've really enjoyed!

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRGz5EMig3r2ZDgeGzwUlSz-PzF-L1Xu1

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 153 points 6 months ago

There was another aspect to this video, which was that when Somerset actually did try to write some of the material himself, it was complete garbage.

For example, he completely plagiarized from a book about Disney, but then, he had to transition between one plagiarized book and a different plagiarized article, and in that transition, he presented some facts about Disney organizing gay events at their park, and it was all outright lies. Disney did not actually have any official LGBTQ events at their parks until far after that.

There was a different YouTube video that came out the next day, from this musician who listed all of the outright lies that he discovered while watching Somerset's channel.

I think the plagiarism displayed by Somerset is atrocious, but personally, I find lying and spreading misinformation to be even worse.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 61 points 6 months ago

Not to mention the rampant misogyny.

The queer community deserves better. Hopefully this will leave some room for other voices

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 22 points 6 months ago

The queer community clearly already has better, as James plagiarized lots of very talented creators and writers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

hbomb included a playlist of smaller queer creators that i've really enjoyed!

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRGz5EMig3r2ZDgeGzwUlSz-PzF-L1Xu1

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 45 points 6 months ago

I think the Todd in the Shadows video was the nail in the coffin. He might’ve been able to slither back by saying he didn’t realize he was attributing incorrectly (like Internet Historian fans are screaming), but he can’t come back from outright lying the times he wasn’t plagiarizing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago

HAHAHA holy fucking shit the level of comeuppance is beautiful. Good riddance. His blatant misogyny and narcissism is disgusting, I hope he finds a cozy stone to crawl under.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 61 points 6 months ago

Profiting from the cause, nice.

Be careful. Even if the cause is just, there is never going to be a shortage of shitbags willing to exploit it for their own gain.

[-] dellish@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

Is him being gay even relevant to what happened, or are they just trying to make this about something it's not?

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 125 points 6 months ago

It's very relevant. One of the big points in the hbomberguy video is that James was known as a prominent voice in the LGBT community, and he blatantly plagiarized other LGBT creators that might have otherwise gained a larger following themselves

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 86 points 6 months ago

It's core to Hbomberguy's video, really. The guy tried to make himself the gay YouTuber by ripping off other queer content producers, and as a persecuted community that's had to deal with a forever of social erasure, that's a whole lot extra shitty.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think it's a little relevant. He's a gay focused YouTuber, in that he talked about gay topics in media, supposedly championing gay voices, while at the same time silencing those same gay voices, stealing their content and claiming it as his own.

For wanting to help the gay community, he really did a lot to hurt the community and help himself. All he had to do is give credit to the people he quoted, but when confronted with accusations, he would claim he's being silenced as a gay creator rather than admit the truth, and his followers would attack the accusers on his behalf, thinking he's being genuine.

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 23 points 6 months ago

He wasn't quoting people though, he was straight up reading other people's work and claiming it as his own. Like whole paragraphs at a time just copy/pasted with a couple words swapped out. Even with proper citations you would be kicked out of college for plagiarizing if you submitted something like that.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

What he did was beyond quoting.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 53 points 6 months ago

His channel was about LGBT issues, so it's actually relevant. It's a reasonable concern and the source material is a four hour long breadtube thing bordering on self-parody, so I don't mind responding to this one.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s posted on lgbtqnation. I’m pretty sure that for their audience it’s incredibly fucking relevant.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 months ago

Maybe try reading the article.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 3laws@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

It's more than relevant. It's pivotal to the whole ordeal.

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Read the damn article 😐

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 months ago

Ita an article from a website called lgbtqnation so its not that surprising. Also the guy stole a lot from queer people and was a misogynist.

[-] kzhe@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

Yes, very relevant.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I guess him being gay isn't exactly important. The important thing is that the content that he stole was mostly about LGBTQ media studies. So "gayness" is relevant, but strictly speaking his gayness is not.

Edit: I would also note that if the headline writer was just adding "gay" to be incendiary, the writer could have said "Gay youtuber taken down by bi youtuber" but that would needlessly putting in the "bi" label. The "gay youtuber" is "writing" about gay stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] atomicorange@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago
[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago

Lgbtqnation really needs a new proofreader. I hear James Somerset is looking for... no, I mean... fuck

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

Still not comfortable about him sleeping on those piles of money.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 31 points 6 months ago

Nope. He was making six figures a year off other people’s hard work.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Just like most wealthy people, his wealth was stolen not earned.

[-] andyMFK@reddthat.com 23 points 6 months ago

Good riddance

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 months ago

He finally deleted his YouTube channel. It was about time.

[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Why does the article start with "Bisexual British YouTube essayist"? What does his sexuality have to do with anything?

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 64 points 6 months ago

Somerton has a bit of a history of weaponizing his fans to attack anyone bringing up issues by painting them as homophobic and attacking a gay man. Hbomberguy made a point of bringing up his own bisexuality in his video before he even brought up Somerton as a way a kneecapping that before it could start.

[-] TooLazyDidntName@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Fantastic answer and a good question at that.

[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Likely to highlight this wasn't a homophobic incident.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

It's actually very important to this discussion. He ripped off a bunch of LGBT+ ppl while promoting himself as one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Electricorchestra@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Todd in the shadows took him to the shadow realm.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] benjihm@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I wonder if Somerton's writer has offered any kind of response yet. It was suggested he may have been left in the dark about all of this.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
366 points (94.4% liked)

News

21693 readers
4288 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS