342

Nearly 240,000 Chicagoans living on less than $19 a day (www.illinoispolicy.org)

submitted 7 months ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Living on less than half of the federal poverty level is considered “deep poverty.” That describes 53% of impoverished Chicagoans.

top 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 77 points 7 months ago

For those wondering. The Illinois Policy Institute (IPI) who wrote this is a rabid libertarian/conservative think tank group. If you read through on this you'll see their "solution" is that government just makes it difficult for able-bodied people to work.

To which I would say, "Yes government should make it difficult for able-bodied people to be coaxed into slave labor wages that while technically gets them above the poverty line, offers no economic mobility. The entire point is that all people should have the ability to not just work but to work towards something that personally affects them in a positive manner, not just grind out 300,000 widgets to allow some CEO buy a new yacht."

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So basically half the population below the age of 18.... i wonder why

https://www.infoplease.com/us/census/illinois/chicago/demographic-statistics

"deep poverty is primarily concentrated among those who are able-bodied, of working age and their children"

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

I guess you might be able to eat on around $19 / day if you only bought the cheapest staples at the grocery store. Sounds very difficult, though.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Eating on $19 a day is absurdly simple. I feed an entire family very well on that.

Eating, transport, housing, medical, clothing, etc is the hard part.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I don't really see the numbers here but they kinda make sense. Minimum wage single mom with two kids, yes that would be about $19 per day per person. Food stamps and WIC and housing assistance for the rest.

Pretty fucking miserable way to live.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I guess you might be able to eat on around $19 / day if you only bought the cheapest staples at the grocery store.

You are including far more.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

That’s only eating. Now start to think about housing and all the other necessities.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Right. Most of those would not be possible.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Lentils, rice, bulk spice, butternut/acorn/spaghetti squash

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Misery to survive, got it.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

People like to eat a variety of food. Not just lentils and squash all the time. Maybe you're fine with a boring palate. Most people like more than two or three flavors, some of them even sweet.

But I guess poor people don't deserve that. Lentils for them every meal.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

This assumes a number of things. One, that my one example is something that people should be eating all the time. Two that the ingredients i listed can only be prepared in a boring way. I'm sorry you lack the imagination or even an Indian cookbook.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

How many ways do you think those four things can be prepared without any other ingredients or even spices?

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Any other weird limitations you'd like to add to this weird scenario?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

What limitations? You only listed those things.

[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

Conservatives: Lazy welfare queens and druggies! They just don't want to work! They chose to be this way! They should all be arrested and/or executed.

Progressives: throws money vaguely in that direction without direction Look we're helping! We're doing all we can.

Leftists: This is the fault of the capitalist system run by an ownership class!

Those of us who've been homeless or near homeless and those genuinely dedicated to helping the homeless: We need a comprehensive approach that takes all the challenges that cause homelessness into account and addresses them as a whole and in a meaningful way to create a long term sustainable solution.

Conservatives, Progressives, and Leftists to us: Shut the fuck up! What do you know about any of this? We'll figure it out! Now shut the fuck up!

[-] swiftcasty@kbin.social 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is a weird take to me. One of the groups is not like the other two in your own example. It is obvious that there is a huge wealth gap driven by unregulated capitalism which is contributing to the problem, and multiple studies have shown that homeless people that receive free money (i.e. a universal basic income) use that money to stop being homeless.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

Leftists are aware that homelessness is a feature of capitalism. Dismantling capitalism is how to fix your problem. With capitalism still in play, homelessness only increases.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

So wait... progressives and leftists are people who have never been homeless or dedicated to helping the homeless?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I spend so much more than that to get to work :(

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They are not poor people they just have less god's enlightment.. 🤞🙏

[+] A_A@lemmy.world -23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is about $7,000usd/year. Now look at Morocco and other such countries in here :

List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita

What I mean here is : when you have a need you are the best person to find a solution.

Of course, this applies only in places where there is no war and Chicago is under some kind of a war.

Gangs in Chicago - Wikipedia
Chicago is considered the most gang-occupied city in the United States, with 150,000 gang-affiliated denizens, (...)

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

Not sure why you even went to the effort to link this because it’s almost completely irrelevant. The cost of living in Chicago and Morocco are not even remotely the same so trying to make the point that people elsewhere in the world can survive off that much so people on Chicago should is nonsense. That’s assuming we’d even consider people in Morocco living on that much as having a decent quality of life.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

I'm trying but I fail to see how you are stringing these very disconnected ideas together. First, how do any of these people get anywhere from Chicago on their own, when they hardly have a penny in savings to their name. Second, what the hell would these people do in Morocco, do you really expect them to get the same $19US a day in a country where they can't speak the national language? They'd all go to become an actor to star in Moroccan films as the token American or something? Or they magically receive the same amount of money begging, or hoping their EBT card works? Or they all get remote jobs that they do without access to internet or a device to access the internet?

I don't know where to start with the gangs part of the comment, it is entirely irrelevant. Addressing gang violence without improving cost of living doesn't do much at all for the situation of the deeply improvished.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

You are absolutely right on the short term and I was not thinking about this, but rather along societal changes ... maybe over more than one generation.
I guess you see it now and I don't have to elaborate (?).

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I'll appreciate that a strategy of spreading people out across the world could have some merit in the long term.

I hope you can also recognize that in the meantime if we don't address barriers to mobility, affordability and living then we can't really be in a situation to effectively implement long term ideas like this.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

First, how do any of these people get anywhere from Chicago on their own (...)

and

I’ll appreciate that a strategy of spreading people out across the world could have some merit in the long term.

What I think is that societies and people can (and will) change. And for this, exile is not necessary. I hope no one is forced to go into exile.

(more on this here)

ideally, (i think) people should be free to go live in whatever country they want. Unfortunately, people in rich countries sees this as a big problem most of the time. But this is another debate all together and it's not what I tried to say here at first.

What I try to say is this very simple idea : it is not only the amount of money like $7000 per year (or whatever amount) that makes people rich or poor but rather :
1- this amount and
2- how they live (as a society).
For example, in some countries, Morocco for instance, (maybe we can find other examples) people live not so bad with quite a low amount of money.

Now ; the USA is a very violent country compared to many western countries (like in Europe). And, inside USA, Chicago is a very violent city compared to many order cities in that country. This way of life (you are with me here, right ?) makes people poorer with the same amount of money.

Please don't tell me my explanation is still confusing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Chicago is a very violent city compared to many order cities in that country.

No it is not.

Republicans just want you to think it is.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Do you realize that cost of living is actually different by region?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Can you please show me where Chicago is on this list?

https://realestate.usnews.com/places/rankings/most-dangerous-places

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Chicago vs. worst ranking, based on
Yearly Crime Rates per 100,000 people
Violent crime, total : 17th worst in USA
Murder (&...) : 14th worst

What's more, all cities which are worse than Chicago are at least three times smaller. Meaning that for cities of at least 1 millon, Chicago is the very worst in the USA.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate

How is it ranked in your ref. ?

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023

342 points (95.0% liked)

News

21676 readers

3016 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world