i like your explanation and i even see one more way you are right about this (and i was wrong) : while it might be a long shot investing in this research, the cost of this is minimal compared to the benefit. So, it's worth the shot (even if the chances of success are ... hum ... unknowable for now)
A_A
Thanks for your reply. You are probably right and I was commenting in frustration about researchers not giving enough credit to nature's capabilities.
Wild species are extremely good at adapting to evolving conditions. Their ability in this is many more times more powerful than any developments these searchers will produce.
On the other hand, researchers are very good at convincing themselves that they should have more money ... well, sometimes they are right.
he cant answer a question ~~without~~ so instead he goes rambling through 5 unrelated topics.
if you want the white paper i have read about this : one is published in nature and other one version of the same thing or very similar in ArXiv :
https://lemmy.world/post/8894179
(not the post itself but the comments i made under my post)
Previously known as Q*, Strawberry was considered a breakthrough within the company last year. Earlier this year, two sources reported Q* demonstrations that could address complex scientific and mathematical questions beyond the reach of current models.
Despite contrary comments in here i say this is important and far reaching. Though i must admit i'm not an expert, i read a few white papers on this stuff : it has real potential.
Your bad translation is unfortunately the best one of every horrible translations in here.
When you face someone, why does your left and their left flipped from one another ?
Any object we face are flipped : it's true also where you are in front of a car from instance ... it doesn't happen when you are inside the car or inside yourself.
if you can see this, you can understand the mirror as well.
Yes ... and it doesn't know when it is on time.
Also, machines are getting better and they can help us with inspiration.
i agree with you that we are much better than LLMs in the fact we can verify our errors (and we can do much more things LLMs don't do).
Still i am happy to have access to their vast memory and i know where they fail most of times so i can work with them in a productive way.
The day we provide them (or DNNs) with "Will" is i think when they will become (more) dangerous.
Science cannot say much about what it is to think since it doesn't understand the brain well enough ... and the day we can fully explained it, we will also be able to replicated it on computers.
China's Salt Typhoon cyber spies spotted deep inside US ISPs :
https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/25/chinas_salt_typhoon_cyber_spies/
Original article : https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/china-cyberattack-internet-providers-260bd835