this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
309 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

12874 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We should already be on a fucking 3 day with increased pay with how much productivity has gone up, instead we're just getting ass raped harder and harder while rich assholes keep getting richer and richer with no end in sight.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, you don’t undestand 😡

One day I’ll be a billionaire too and I can be the one that ass rapes others 😎

Tap for spoiler/s

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I read the following sentence a day ago and it's stuck with me:

We europeans shouldn't laugh at the suffering of the American people, just because we get fucked in the ass with slightly more lube.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

12.2% of US workers are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. In Europe the lowest rate is Greece at 14.2%, but most other countries are much, much higher. Right-wing Hungary is at 21.8%. Bend-over-backwards-for-US-tech-companies Ireland is at 34%. The home of the bankers, Switzerland, is at 45%. No other European country is below 50%, and the biggest economies France is at 98%, Germany is at 80% and Italy is at 100%.

Europeans may not be fully satisfied with the balance of power between corporations and workers. But, it is doing so much better than the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

with how much productivity has gone up

How has productivity gone up?

We should already be on a fucking 3 day

Are you aware how the 5-day work week happened? It wasn't something that workers just got when it started to make sense. There were literal street battles between striking unionized workers and cops. People were hanged by the government. It took decades.

If you want that change to happen, you need to form or join a union. Right now in the US only 12.2% of workers are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. That's the 4th lowest in the OECD, with only Mexico, Costa Rica and Turkey lower. Canada is at 31%. Switzerland, one of the most right-wing countries in Europe is at 45%. Spain is at 80%, France is at 98% and Italy is at 100%.

Once people are covered by CBAs, the unions need to flex their power and go on strike.

Complaining on the Internet is not going to cause the situation to change.

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Studies show productivity has a sharp drop off after 6 hours iirc

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Mine starts badly, tails off a little in the middle, and the least said about the end the better, but other than that I always give 100%.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We should get a 4 day work week anyway even with reduced hours. It is fucking ridiculous people think that it is possible to do anything but the simplest tasks actively for 8 hours without breaks and be productive. People who think that are either stupid or have never spent a single second analyzing what they do in their day. Practically all companies already operate with their employees getting all work done within a few hours and lounging away with tiny bits of looking busy throughout the day. Might as well let them go home and rest so they can have higher motivation, clearer minds and more productivity. It's a win win.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Suppose that at a given moment a certain number of people are engaged in the manufacture of pins. They make as many pins as the world needs, working (say) eight hours a day. Someone makes an invention by which the same number of men can make twice as many pins as before. But the world does not need twice as many pins: pins are already so cheap that hardly any more will be bought at a lower price. In a sensible world everybody concerned in the manufacture of pins would take to working four hours instead of eight, and everything else would go on as before. But in the actual world this would be thought demoralizing. The men still work eight hours, there are too many pins, some employers go bankrupt, and half the men previously concerned in making pins are thrown out of work. There is, in the end, just as much leisure as on the other plan, but half the men are totally idle while half are still overworked. In this way it is insured that the unavoidable leisure shall cause misery all round instead of being a universal source of happiness. Can anything more insane be imagined?

—Bertrand Russell, In Praise of Idleness, 1935

[–] hark@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (22 children)

We should've gotten a 4-day work week decades ago. Now it should be a 3-day work week at most and I'm being generous. The capitalists are always screeching about the low birth rate, but if people were working 3 days a week and making a decent living off that time, it would help the birth rate because then a household with two working parents could be scheduled on different days and alternate staying home with the child, plus have a shared day off every week.

Anyway, that's just a selling point to make to the capitalists. Whether or not it helps with the birth rate doesn't matter as much as the fact that we're owed shorter work weeks thanks to all the blood, sweat, and tears that labor has put into making the world as wealthy as it is now. What's the point of all this work if not to improve our standard of living? Technology making our lives better is hitting diminishing returns and now it's often not making our lives better or it's even making our lives worse.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

George Jetson's work week was one hour a day, two days a week. That's what we were promised we'd get once everything was automated, not that Spacely Space Sprockets would make us work 60 hours a week and pocket all the extra productivity for themselves.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

We as a species could have built a leisure society decades ago. The raw energy input of fossil fuels could have been wisely parceled out by a council of benevolent dictators, while we live under the domes and chase Jessica 7 on a monorail.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's make anything over 32 hours double pay.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

4 days is kinda outdated, like how the $15 minimum is so long overdue it's moot. 24 hours. 3 days working vs 4 days living. We deserve to live more than we work.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Absolutely agree. They wanna complain about entitlement. They think they're entitled to 3/4 of all of our lives.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Heck. This should have happened in the 80's.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Instead we got trickled on.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Get ready for more. We have the golden dome coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It did, for a select few. Less than four days, even. You just had to be one of the finance sector aristocrats who laid claim to enough passive rents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We could have done this 150 years ago when oil gave us 100 times more energy back than it took to extract it.

Humans are a defective species, we must see others suffer.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nah it’s just that the socio-economic system we’re stuck with that literally incentivizes ghoulish behavior that causes suffering. Change the system, change humanity.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

No, no, no. They'll just make it so that each of us is expected to do more since AI is "helping" us. Success under capitalism just leads to more work. The number has to keep going up. If they get their arms twisted they may give us a day off, but they will absolutely decrease the pay. My fear is that they would also go, "Oh, well, since you're not working 40 hours a week, even though it's the same work, so no benefits for you 🤷🏿‍♀️."

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“Technology is gonna work to improve us, not just the people who own the technology and the CEOs of large corporations,” Sanders said. “You are a worker, your productivity is increasing because we give you AI, right? Instead of throwing you out on the street, I’m gonna reduce your work week to 32 hours.”

0% chance this wouldn't also come with a 20% pay cut.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

40% pay cut, those server farms are expensive

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, but that's not what's being discussed. Sanders is saying people deserve a 4 day work week at full pay.

Anyone can negotiate a 4 day work week for a 20% paycut. That's not worth public figures time to discuss.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, in Germany: There are a lot of unemployed people, and there are a lot of people who want a four-day week, so what we desperately need is working longer hours.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

?

Oh. I missed the sarcasm. But yes, that is how conclusions work in my country, as well.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they just like squeezing out some more. Why should the efficiency gains of the last decades help the people, after all? No, what we really need is richer billionaires.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, personal computers made us productive enough for a 4 day work week. We’re down to like 24 hours per week now. I think many would enjoy four 6-hour days, while others may prefer three 8-hour days. And a rare few might want to work two 12-hour shifts.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Honestly, there's probably a lot of people actually working these shorter weeks to get their productive work done but just being forced to sit at a desk for the full 40. Office Space's "15 minutes of real work each day" didn't come from no where.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

3-day by now. 4-day was due before AI, so why would this great boost not make the difference?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

3-day week, baseline annual salary across the board of $100,000, free health care for all and capital asset tax of 95% over $50 million

Who's with me?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But then they couldn't pay 1/2 as many people as they used to while still expecting the same amount of work to get done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's already cooked Bernie. It's a charred dead carcass.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›