this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
25 points (85.7% liked)

Linux

7694 readers
511 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An automated script to set-up Ubuntu as it should be. Tested on Ubuntu 22.04, 23.04, 24.04 and 25.04.

Features :

  • Removes snaps completely
  • Installs a vanilla gnome session
  • Sets up flathub and gnome-software with the flatpak plugin
  • Installs gnome-tweaks
  • Installs Extension Manager
  • Disables the Ubuntu theming
  • Enables the libadwaita theme in gtk3 apps using adw-gtk3.
  • Installs the MoreWaita icon theme for extended icon support.
  • Enables Gnome integration with QT apps
  • Installs Firefox from the Mozilla Repository
  • Disables the data reporting component
  • Disables the annoying crash popup Removes terminal ads

TL;DR, you will end up with a clean GNOME desktop with flatpaks, similar to a fresh Fedora install.

https://github.com/polkaulfield/ubuntu-debullshit

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

At this point why use Ubuntu?

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

Exactly what I wanted to say. If you have to modify the operating system this much, why do you want use it? It's not like Windows, we have lot of alternatives, and similar alternatives using the same foundation too. I don't understand these efforts.

I am baffled.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Longer support windows with LTS? I could see some people or industries sticking with a particular LTS in order to keep particular pieces of software running.

Otherwise, I agree, why bother.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

If you don't care the entire operating system, just to run a few specific software, then there are gotta be better alternatives. Debian, Mint or even Fedora could be good alternatives.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Needs GNUbuntu

[–] alphapuggle@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

So uh, what's wrong with Debian?

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

And you check the ones you want or its all or nothing?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I wonder if updates between Ubuntu versions break with all these changes.

[–] bradfrank@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

Seriously, what a PITA it would be to do this every 6 months (assuming you don’t use a LTS). I looked at this script and just decided to go with Debian.

[–] kixik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course using another distro you want to emulate is much better.

But as it's debian based, I'm wondering if a better approach would be to use repos from another close enough distro, like derivative distros which decide to build the stuff for the distro as much as possible (that maybe won't prevent the need of flatpak and the like).

Another approach would be using a package manager that can work on top of any distro, like Guix, at least for FLOSS software.

I use artix, so if something is not in the official artix repos pacman also look on arch repos, then it looks my personal repos (I build some personal packages, but I also use aurutils, so there are packages on one of my personal repos that are really aur packages not mine). As I prefer to package the stuff I can't find anywhere I haven't found the need for something like Guix, but it might come handful if in order to include some software which depends on software way old for artix or something similar to that. Just a reminder that Guix and the like will work fine as package mechanism on top of any distro given their approach to keep the software out of the common unix path hierarchy.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

Ooo, another Artix user! We're like hen's teeth.