this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
229 points (99.1% liked)

World News

35804 readers
477 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Docker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

This is too pathetic. Can we have some Bollywood rather ??

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I for one am hoping that we do get a nuclear winter. Great way to balance out global warming.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Supposedly a myth. Not even all nukes in the world would cause it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm not tempted to test the theory in order to find out. Either way, the sudden collapse in human life would put enormous downward pressure on carbon emissions. Can't burn gas if you don't have anyone left to pull it out of the ground.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 10 points 21 hours ago

Kinda scary that the kids from this video are old enough to make good on their pledges, but also that they will probably have to.

[–] RockLobstore@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is pretty scary. If something huge kicked off, who would USA support? I feel like Trump is just waiting for his opportunity (ie major war/attack) to declare martial law and extend his presidency past 4 years. I really hope I’m wrong.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

I don't think Trump is waiting.

[–] missingstring@retrolemmy.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

On the bright side a hot war between two nuclear powers likely means you won’t have to worry about the next four years.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hilariously those are the two that would probably be containable.

[–] Docker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago

Unfortunately I think most of us would probably survive at least the a couple of those years, as much as we might wish we died.

[–] edel@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First thing first, the Pakistani PM does not have any authority and overwhelming of Pakistanis detest him. Pakistan is being rule exclusively by the military after the imprisonment of the leader who undisputedly won the elections, Mr Khan.

Now this conflict puzzles me. I don´t think Trump could care much about the region so probably not behind it. Israel certainly likes the current military rule in Pakistan so probably will use its resources in Washington to stop it… Israel for sure would not allow Imran Khan to take the Pakistani leadership again.

Now, I am sure US arms industry wants conflict in South Asia to compensate the winding down in Ukraine and the US establishment is excited to drive India more dependent in the US’ weaponry for safety and away from China (that has a stake too in Kashmir.)

One possible theory is that Israel thinks it can provide intel to India about Pakistani nuclear weapons and then for its operatives to get rid of Mr Khan before gets the legitimate power back… but I find it too risky...who knows. I don´t think even the Pakistani nuclear weapons are in working condition with the current Pakistani government that US fully vetted before it took power.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 19 hours ago

have you considered for a moment, i know it's crazy, that two authoritarian states historically gnashing at the bit to go to war might be doing this of their own volition?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Looks like my theory that WW3 was gonna be a bunch of pocket wars instead of a one side vs the other is coming to fruition.

[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ukraine/Russia war (Europe). Israeli genocide of Palestine. Hezb/houthi resistance to Israel. Whatever is going on in Syria. (Middle East). Sudanese genocide with similar small resistance pockets. (Africa). Now India and Pakistan (asia).

We are in the early stages of WW3. Loose allyships are already being revealed.

With the widening rift between the US and China, I imagine Taiwan will become a hot issue soon as well.

That's probably the tipping point at which, allyships will start to be formed more concretely as China has been trying to stay out of things for the most part so far.

[–] Docker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

We're in the hot stages of WWIII.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also the civil war in Myanmar that is ongoing. With various degrees of Chinese and Russian involvement.

[–] Docker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

I have family in Thailand with ancestors on Mom's side that came from Burma.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm still wondering when American balkanization will happen. If WW3 isn't in full swing yet by then, it will be afterwards.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From my standpoint as an American citizen of at least 3 generations, I don't think balkanization will be happen here, just because the divisions aren't neatly aligned as of 2020. image

Cities tend to be Democrat, rural areas tend to be Republican -- regardless of state. It's not like the Civil War where it was more easily divided.

What's more likely to happen is a full on economic collapse soon. Where things go from there is anyone's guess -- but I don't see balkanization as a part of it. If Trump and team declare martial law and start doing even more human atrocities it might be the spark for WW3. Does that happen before China attacks Taiwan and start WW3?

Regardless of what happens, this is going to be ugly and a whole lot of people are going to die.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If the US balkanizes, "Democrat" and "Republican" isn't where the split will happen. Less than half the voting population even identifies with either party, ffs.

There's plenty of cultural, religious and legal splits that could lead to a split. California is the obvious example, which would have to split with or take over Nevada and Colorado for the river and the dam. Texans has never been shy about longing for their own microstate and the swamp south has about as much in common with Seattle or Illinois as they do with British Columbia, if that.

[–] Docker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What is balkanisation ??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 14 points 1 day ago

It's gotta be getting close now, it feels like a breaking point is coming for America really soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I sure hope two nuclear powers don't have a hot war!

[–] Docker@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

It's getting hotter 🥵🥵🥵

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Oh good. Another conflict.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›