this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
535 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

68813 readers
5196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Keener@lemm.ee 232 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Former shopify employee here. Tobi is scum, and surrounds himself with scum. He looks up to Elon and genuinely admires him.

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shame, because I used to actually admire how he handled layoffs. Was a far sight better (from outside looking in) than the "thanks, here's one extra paycheck, send your laptop back at your expense please" I'd experienced

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what laptop? ^* is what I said

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Still have mine gathering dust when one american startup (went under already) laid me off 1 day before I had to be legally granted my equity shares and they had the audacity to ask me to arrange the return lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago

Dear Tobi Lütke - AI can do your job too. Care to comment?

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

What these CEOs don't understand is that even an error rate as low as 1% for LLMs is unacceptable at scale. Fully automating without humans somewhere in the loop will lead to major legal liabilities down the line, esp if mistakes can't be fixed fast.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. If 1% of all requests result in failures and even cause damages, you‘ll quickly lose 99% of your customers.

[–] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's starting to look like the oligarchs are going to replace every position they can with AI everywhere so we have no choice but to deal with its shit.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dev: “Boss, we need additional storage on the database cluster to handle the latest clients we signed up.”

Boss: “First see if AI can do it.”

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago

Currently the answer would be "Have you tried compressing the data?" and "Do we really need all that data per client?". Both of which boil down to "ask the engineers to fix it for you and then come back to me if you are a failure"

[–] ramielrowe@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

A coworker of mine built an LLM powered FUSE filesystem as a very tongue-in-check response to the concept of letting AI do everything. It let the LLM generate responses to listing files in directories and reading contents of the files.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

thats a golden opportunity for some sweet malicious compliance.

let ai fuck their codebase then get paid for the long time you'd need to fix it. punish their money for being dumb, and do it by giving them exactly what they want.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 66 points 1 week ago

Should ask the AI model if a CEO is required

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 64 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Why do I get the feeling that the hot new thing for CEOs to do is ask AI whenever they need to make a decision. Would explain a lot.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hey Tobi, why do need to pay you any bonus moving forward? What did you do the AI couldn't?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gudl@feddit.org 59 points 1 week ago

CEOs are obsolete

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

ask why there is a need for CEO, a job that can be done by AI.

If you work there, run away fast.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I develop AI agents rn as part time for my work and have yet to see one that can perform a real task unsupervised on their own. It's not what agents are made for at all - they're only capable of being an assistant or annotate, summarize data etc. Which is very useful but in an entirely different context.

No agent can create features or even reliably fix bugs on their own yet and probably not for next few years at least. This is because having a dude at 50$ hour is much more reliable than any AI agent long term. If you need to roll back a regression bug introduced by an AI agent it'll cost you 10-20 developer hours as minimum which negates any value you've gained already. Now you spent 1,000$ fix for your 50$ agent run where a person could have done that for 200$. Not to mention regression bugs are so incredibly expensive to fix and maintain so it'll all scale exponentially. Not to mention liability of not having human oversight - what if the agent stops working? You'll have to onboarding someone on an entire code base which would take days as very minimum.

So his take on ai agents doing work is pretty dumb for the time being.

That being said, AI tool use proficiency test is very much unavoidable, I don't see any software company not using AI assistants so anyone who doesn't will simply not get hired. Its like coding in notepad - yeah you can do it but its not a signal you want to send to your team cause you'd look stupid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Hard to imagine a CEO doing something that would make me less likely to apply or use their service.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dear CEOs: I will never accept 0.5% hallucinations as “A.I.” and if you don’t even know that, I want an A.I. machine cooking all your meals. If you aren’t ok with 1/200 of your meals containing poison, you’re expendable.

Humans or even regular ass algorithms are fine. A.I. can predict protein folding. It should do a lot else unless there’s a generational leap from “making shitty images” to “as close to perfect as it gets.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] RandoMcRanderton@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“Stagnation is almost certain, and stagnation is slow-motion failure.”

This has some strong Ricky Bobby vibes, "If you ain't first, you're last." I never have understood how companies are supposed to have unlimited growth. At some point when every human on earth that can use their service/product is already doing so, where else is there to go? Isn't stagnation being almost certain just a reality of a finite world?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

At some point when every human on earth that can use their service/product is already doing so, where else is there to go?

Ooh, I know:

  • Charge more (for less)
  • Autocannibalize (layoffs)

I don't even have an MBA, can you believe that?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Just reminding everyone that Lutke is a right-wing shitheel, and that he and Shopify explicitly platform, support and make money from Nazism.

Carry on.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Id tell them I can get AI to do anything they want. They're the ones who will be paying for me to spend not hours but days tweaking prompts to get whatever shit they want done that could've been done faster cheaper and better with appropriate resources so fuck it I'm in.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Dystopian.

Also:

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like AI, but we are still in the biplane era of development. It will take a long time before it can handle most things, let alone unsupervised.

If Shopify goes follows through with imitating Musk's stupidity, I expect the company to end up as a case study.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 14 points 1 week ago

Well, first the CEO is asking for proof of a negative, so anyone with a logical brain cell just has to shake their head and repeat "it's for the paycheck."

We can assume CEO means "show me you tried to use AI and it's not working well enough," which isn't all that bad of a directive but it's got the huge gaps of "do your people really know how to use AI?" and "are they using the correct, latest versions of AI for the task they are attempting?" But, it may stand up a few use cases for AI that would have otherwise used expensive meat sacks to do what must be fairly boring rote recitation work if they can be adequately replaced by AI.

The problem comes when senseless metrics get pushed down that amount to: a certain number of AI projects must be greenlighted, regardless of how dreadful they are in practice.

AI is a tool, it can save labor, it can relieve human employees of tedious work, it can't do everything. All this "big personality" top level management of large and very large organizations with broad stroke metrics leads to mass stupidity when the underlings blindly follow orders, and I suspect - within its limitations - AI will always follow orders, so getting AI into middle management will only magnify the idiocrazy.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

should just be a matter of saying “AI can’t do this job because it can’t properly do any job”. could even make that your email signature.

[–] Atmoro@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Let's all just make new companies that are unionized-cooperatives bringing all our coworkers into them

In this example that CEO isn't needed

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

now is the best time for that since rich people are kicking people out left and right to replace them with ai. Maybe something good will come out of the ai maddness if people start doing this

[–] Atmoro@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

If we all slowly nudge, & inspire to do the same then it'll create a domino effect. Gotta keep growing

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Can we prove AI can do the job of the CEO?

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Uhm...but like...at the moment you cant really trust ai to do ANYTHING alone

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI is pretty good at spouting bullshit but it doesn't have the same giant ego that human CEOs have so resources previously spent on coddling the CEO can be spent on something more productive. Not to mention it is a lot less effort to ignore everything an AI CEO says.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Employees should start setting up an AI to prove it can do Tobi Lutke's extremely difficult job of making a small number of important decisions every once in a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›