this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1924 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

11277 readers
141 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExistentialCrispies@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago

Well 50 cents are enough for cathy to forget her mathy

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Cathy do the mathy. Missed opportunity

[–] BullishUtensil@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

There are two schools of thought:

Those who want as good life as possible, and Those who want to have a better life than everyone else, no matter what.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The fact that Cathy has a blue check mark proves Twitter is fucking stupid.

[–] Someone64@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it doesn’t mean what it used to anymore. Now you just pay for a subscription and you get it. Hell, I don’t know why you ever thought the check mark pre-Musk ever meant anything other than somebody’s identity being verified as true judging by what you’re saying... Never meant that their opinions were Twitter approved or whatever.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 22 hours ago

The blue check went through some twists and turns. Originally it was meant as "your identity is verified", then it became a status symbol, then it had extra features attached to it. At one point the people approving them were literally taking bribes to expedite or guarantee your blue check (like personal bribes, not a payment to Twitter). And at some point along the way it somehow became a "Twitter approves" thing, because at least one person had their blue check stripped for going too far as a right wing troll (Milo Yianno-whatever). All of that pre-Muak.

Post-Musk, it's just a subscription you pay for with some extra features and there's now a different checkmark for corporate or government entities that merely verifies their identity.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When somebody insists, "X doesn't matter because my salary depends on X," it's time to stop beating your head against a wall to teach them anything.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago

Nah, nah, you see - I had an excellent breakfast today. Clearly that means world hunger doesn't exist! Checkmate, leftist!

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 18 points 1 day ago

My company acquired a division that had a great union and we all got more vacation days. Woot!

Lol the fact that she even has a contract at all is because of unions.

[–] varjen@lemmy.world 115 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Together we bargain, alone we beg.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This needs to be on a fucking t-shirt.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Sure. Have your pro Union T-shirt. And what better place to buy it from than

https://www.amazon.com/Union-Workers-Bargain-Collectively-T-Shirt/dp/B08XHYS16W

Speacial offer for Prime Members: Order today and get to watch the first 30 Minutes of Fightclub Ad-free.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] auginator@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I got higher at position as senior. But It wasn’t until I was able to join the Union that my income doubled. Year before I joined like in 2007 manager gave me a .10 raise. This shit is real.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty soon we won’t be able to trust BLS data, which is frightening.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The BLS data has historically been a method by which capitalists measured and managed labor power as a fungible resource. It has historically been a tool of capital to evaluate the influence of policy on labor, not a tool of labor to pressure capital for concessions.

Not to say the information isn't valuable on its face. But it should be worth recognizing that we are looking at autocannibalization of capital. The people most injured by dismantling the BLS are the people who do the bulk of the hiring, not the people being hired.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 305 points 2 days ago (31 children)

I love how one person cites a statistic, and another person just dismisses it as false because of their anecdotal experience.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

If these people were good at critical thinking, they wouldn't have these stupid fucking opinions to begin with.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 204 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I live in California, so there was a lot of bemoaning the rising minimum wage.

“Why should someone flipping burgers earn as much as I do in a trade field?”

Mate, you should be arguing for increased wages, not trying to keep others down.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 49 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Man I was sad as shit when Nina Turner lost. Bernie Sanders backed her up too.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think she's running again. I was at a UAW conference last week and Nina Turner spoke there. I think she's trying to drum up support for another run.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 149 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Cathy is a dumbass. Don't be like Cathy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 115 points 2 days ago (7 children)

"your statistic is false because I have an anecdote" is literally the entire basis of the conservative understanding of science.

union workers don't make more on average because I earn half a dollar more.

global warming isn't happening because I brought a snowball.

vaccines cause death because my friend walked out of a clinic after a shot and got hit by a self driving tesla.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments