Which side does he think NATO would support?
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
313 points (99.4% liked)
News
27164 readers
4856 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
An attack on one is an attack on all. I always wondered what would happen if one NATO country attacked another.
No matter how dumb you think he is I'm sure his cult is lapping it up.
"We want you to violate the sovereignty of a fellow NATO country. Are you in?"
Literally what's wrong with you? How dense can one carrot be?
A literal carrot would be an improvement over the current orange tyrant.
Amazing. It is like they want people to hate America as much as possible before America starts confronting China.
Trumps fundamental and broad stupidity amazes every day.
Putin stooge wants an easy war somewhere.
He probably wants that the NATO acquires Greenland, Canada, etc. for the US.
The more I look into Greenland situation the more I am thinking there's already a psychological campaign in play to get them to be part of the US. They're legitimately trying to get away for the Danish government and there's a strong US presence there already with military bases. I suspect the target is to get them to hand over the keys not only willingly but ask for it.
Then we drill drill drill dig dig dig
Trump added that the result was very good for the US and 'the person who did the best is a very good person as far as we’re concerned'
Me too form together words too
I've read the article and it's just gibberish. I can't even conclude how they came to this headline.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Reminds me of mission briefings in KSP.
Given that he regards the Department of Justice as his personal litigators, it makes sense that he’d regard NATO as his enforcers.
I hope NATO does get involved. Not the same way Trump hopes though...
Canada has three of top 5 longest sniper kills. Ukraine has the top spot. We just need to export a small chunk of metal at high velocity into a golf course.
I hope you're prepared to pay an extra 25% on that export.
No, no, the importer pays the tax. You might want to send them a little extra if you want to help them out with that.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The mighty US of A needs NATO to invade an island with 56,000 inhabitants?
Is Wakanda located on that island or what?
Maybe he meant against us not supporting us?
Dumbass doesn't even understand that NATO is a DEFENSIVE pact and that Denmark is a member. Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.
Also if he really cared about security he would have strengthened his ties with his allies instead of pushing them away. The US is far less secure now that it was 3 months ago.
Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.
Having been married to a narcissist for 11 years, yes, that's literally how they think. My ex would fly off the handle if I told her "no" to sex or whatever it was that she wanted. She'd throw out all kinds of excuses about how it was my fault somehow, and even during our divorce, when we were literally separated, she forced her way into my room (we still lived in the same house for a few weeks) just to "cuddle" and would throw a fit if I didn't give in. Remember, we were getting divorced. I had to put my foot down hard on that line. And yes, she would get violent.
Orange presidents with tiny dick syndrome calling a country's refusal to give up territory an "attack" is not much different, fundamentally.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is wholly out of control.
Fix your country, you absolute selfish idiots.
No. You don't understand. Imagine 1930s Germany. Imagine what those German citizens must have been like. That's America, but possibly more stupider.
I don't disagree, but... how?
- Joining and organizing within your local community to create connections with others is incredibly powerful, will lay the groundwork for effective resistance.
- We can effect things drastically with a general strike. This can massively impact their income streams, and can bring a government to its knees if done on a large enough scale.
- Join the IWW and attempt to unionize your workplace, so that the general strike is even more effective.
If we put in the work, we can resist this and we can win. Join up with allies while we still can easily!
load more comments
(18 replies)
load more comments
(16 replies)
Trump thinks that NATO is his personal army now?
Eh, must be Tuesday
Trump being an idiot? Must be a day that starts with a T.
There's Tuesday and Thursday. Thriday, Thaturday and Thunday. And of course Tonday and Tednesday.
You forgot Today and Tomorrow.
He wants Greenland the same way as Putin wanted extra countries. How many countries did Russia invade between 2000 and 2020?
National security is just a pretext. Greenland already contributes to your national security you king. They’re a part of NATO. You already have force projection up there if required.
The only people who should dictate Greenland's sovereignty are it's inhabitants.
He knows this. He's just making moves to divide the West. Tariffs aren't about local manufacturing, they're supposed to make people mad at each other.
His entire campaign and following is about division and hate. And the lies to cause said division.
NATO will do exactly nothing to help the bloated orange shit-weasel take over Greenland.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Greenland and Canada are NATO countries. You cannot attack or forcefully annex another NATO country. If he leaves NATO, he will be up against Canada & Europe. The US is one Twizzler away from having the entire world sanction & boycott it.
And who does that benefit on the large scale?
This isn't Trump being a greedy idiot. This is systematic destruction of the US from inside out. Can't say Russia didn't warn you though:
"We will take America without firing a shot. We do not have to invade the US. We will destroy you from within."
— Nikita Khrushchev January 18th, 1956
It's pretty clear he's a putin asset.
view more: next ›