this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
754 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

48441 readers
3130 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (18 children)

I know we're in a meme community but this did get me thinking... Not only is the Earth spinning but it's also in an orbit around the Sun which is also orbiting around the center of the Milky Way which is moving through space relative to other galaxies and so on.

Do we have enough information to calculate a position in space in the future for Earth without a fixed reference other than current point?

[–] ssnoer@feddit.dk 5 points 15 hours ago

There is not central point in the universe, and no way to calculate a position. Everything is relatove

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is why Doctor Who has a time and space machine. Also because the BBC didn’t have the effects budget to show him flying around.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

We also get a few glances of the coordinate system that the time machines use in doctor who. It appears to have enough digits for a date/time as well as an X/Y/Z grid coordinate.

[–] NerdsGonnaNerd@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Here, that might be interesting to you.

You are not where you think you are

[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think we have a relative fixed point to go off unless you choose the centre of the big bang. It's all relative to other things around us which are also moving lol

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

There actually isn't a center of the big bang, every point is expanding away equally.

[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't everywhere kinda the center?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

I think you'll run into the three body problem.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WeirdAlex03@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

Should have watched Tom Scott

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This blew my mind. All those movies!

So, Back to the Future's a bunch of bullshit?!

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's possible to assume that the professor did the math.

But yeah any time machine would also basically have to have space travel built in to compensate.

They knew that when they wrote Dr Who (IE the time travel machine is called a TARDIS (Time and Relative Dimension in Space).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] potoo22@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago

There's a ton of issues with time travel. That could be one, but most fictional time-travel devices can be said to accommodate for the difference in distance. It would just be boring to explain on-screen.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

floating astronaut with pistol always has been

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 8 points 1 day ago

That's why doctor who works, its very clear about the fact that TARDIS travels in spacetime, it can do only time, only space or both space and time and they can get away with time traveling and still staying on earth

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could be explained as a time and space machine but just saying time machine is easier.

That's how ive always thought of these things in my head.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but imagine if you could set it to the same time but different distance, it would allow you to teleport, that might be too strong.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Sounds like a good tech concept for a story

[–] malle_yeno@pawb.social 9 points 21 hours ago

It should be illegal to remind people (me, particularly) about Steins;Gate while they're at work

I can't be fucking crying on the clock, dawg

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's just another problem with the mechanics of the snap at the end of Avengers: Endgame

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Magic exists in that universe though and they're using some of the most powerful objects in the universe. So like if it's granting a wish, you just wish that everyone comes back to earth or whatever. It's not even really a suspension of disbelief. It feels more silly to think that genius scientists using wish granting artifacts wouldn't remember to account for the movement of the earth through space.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, I never thought about that.

It's even cooler if you remember we send something to the moon even with all this variables and no calculators humans were able to know where the moon would be

Of course the moon is relatively close but still

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago

Math is hard.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago

Oooohh. Thanks for the tip, just added that into my time travelling port o pottie's destination algorithms. Gotta respect the earth be moving and shit.

[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the earth will never be in the same place twice. So it's not even like you can only jump increments of a solar year.

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And its not like there even is a same place. Position is relative, but to what in this case? Doesn't even make sense

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

well it's likely the big bang has a central point, no?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Imagine the universe as the surface of a balloon. The Big Bang Theory stipulates that at one point, the balloon was extremely small, like a single point. But now that the balloon is bigger, you can't find a particular spot on the balloon where that point was, because everywhere was that point. No matter where you are in the universe, if you turned back time and shrunk the balloon back down, you would be at the point of the Big Bang. Nowhere is closer or farther away from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

No central point there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

See, that's a problem they always skip in time-travel movies.

[–] Codeviper828@lemmus.org 4 points 22 hours ago

At least in Doctor Who, the T.A.R.D.I.S. can't teleport through space as well as through time, solving that problem. But most time machines don't

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Heyy this property features in the accidental time machine by Joe Haldeman

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

Also ghosts likely wouldn't be affected by a gravitational pull, so the concept doesn't make sense and there'd just be a trail of ghosts in space.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

Can't they just float and follow the Earth? Or would it be too fast? What's the terminal velocity of a ghost?

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What is this comment in response to?

[–] Contemporarium@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago

Glad I’m not the only one confused. Who’s talmbout ghosts

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

I also think about this a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

I always wondered about this

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›