this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
634 points (98.2% liked)

News

25742 readers
3527 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Had no idea a boycott was happening.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 44 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

My wife told me we are boycotting, so lets do this!

I have 3 trans friends and as a super straight middle aged privileged all to hell white dad, fuck these corporate assholes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I work at the Target warehouse that supplies the northwest, should be interesting to see if this actually noticeably changes our daily product volume. Gonna hazard a guess at no probably not. I should have some idea within 24 hours thanks to just in time logistics but seasonal product could fuzz the numbers a bit.

Works for me though, I'm mostly here for the tuition benefit and I don't lose benefits eligibility unless I dip below 20/hr/week average which I can't imagine happening.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Putting a time limit on a boycott undermines the boycott.

Saw this with the Loblaw’s boycott here in Canada, it was very ineffective because they can just wait it out.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

From the point of view of the boycotter, having a time limit helps mentally.

I think more people are ready to think "just buy somewhere else for a bit". If it becomes "forever" might seem daunting.

My two cents, not sure if this is the real reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Instead if 40 days, let's try 40 months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I used to pretty regularly shop at target. When they rolled back DEI proactively for trump, I stopped.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Using gift cards is OK if you're boycotting a place, right? I mean, Target already has the money and you'd just be helping them out if you didn't buy anything with them.

I'm a school bus driver and I always get a lot of tips (Christmas and end of year) in the form of Target gift cards. BTW yes, I agree that tipping school bus drivers is fucking weird. We already get paid and it's not like we're going to drive the kids into a tree if we don't get tipped.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Those are Christmas gifts. The parents are just showing appreciation for you already not driving their kids into a tree, not bribing you lol.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago

No, it’s definitely bribes lol

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. The explanation is somewhat complex.

Although target already has the money once a gift card has been purchased, they will not recognise the money as revenue until you use the card.

Suppose my lawn mowing guy charges $50 each time he mows my lawn, and he comes 12 times a year. In January I just transfer him $600 because I don't want to muck around with smaller payments all the time.

When he calculates his "revenue" for January, should he include the whole $600? It would be more accurate to set aside the $550 he hadn't really earned yet, and recognise that once he actually does the work.

There's more geaky accounting stuff I could say, but in summary if you want to send a message to Target management, refrain from using gift cards during the boycott.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SynAcker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 15 hours ago

I'll allow it.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 14 hours ago

We already get paid and it’s not like we’re going to drive the kids into a tree if we don’t get tipped.

You might not do it, I however am always looking for revenue streams. If it’s for profit, it can’t be illegal.

Looks at the health insurance industry

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 26 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

Every time I've gone into a target in the last 5 years, they legit looked like they were closing down. Idk why people are boycotting them in particular when Walmart and Amazon are way worse.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

i can tell you why - because it's easy. this is slacktivism. it changes nothing about policy. it exists exclusively to make people feel better about capitulating and doing nothing to prevent their country from becoming a fascist dictatorship

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

"Hey! That store you don't shop at? Make sure you continue to not shop there for the next 40 days! That'll show the elites!"

[–] Meowskers@dubvee.org 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Every Target I go to is nicer than Walmart and has a more curated feel of products. I agree on the last part but it's because Target was advertising itself as being more in touch with things such as DEI and then backtracked, where Walmart and Amazon never positioned themselves as much.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Same, I get major K-Mart in its final days vibes: lots of empty shelves, stuff in dented and torn packaging, hostile and surly employees etc. etc.

Browsing through the Target grocery section has always mystified me. Not great selection and everything costs about 50% more than the local grocery stores. I have never understood why anybody would shop there for groceries.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, Kmart vibes is accurate.

There was a time when Target had a middle class demo they...targeted. But that demo is too small now. They're either going to need to shrink and market to the top 10%, competing with Whole Foods, or lower their standards and compete with Amazon. Oof, gotta love monopolies. Starting to think this boycott was Bezos' idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Our Target is in pretty good shape, always busy. Wonder what the difference is…locale? Management?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It couldn’t come at a worse time for the company

Neither could their capitulation to Trumps bigoted rhetoric.

I got a lot of flak and eye rolls from my liberal friends a few years ago when I, as a queer woman, would criticize their Rainbow Capitalism. But Target is not an ally, they never were. They are simply a corporation that got some easy publicity in liberal spaces by showing the bare minimum decency.

Fair weather allies, aren't.

[–] GunValkyrie@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just to build on this. No publicly traded company is an ally to any group but its shareholders.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 32 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's why it's our responsibility as consumers to align their shareholder interests to doing the right fucking thing. Boycotts and other consumer action are part of their calculations on what the shareholder interests are, so a large population of informed consumers who vote their conscience with their wallet will provide pressure to do the right thing.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

So we must become the shareholders?

Target is under more pressure than companies like Walmart, John Deere or Tractor Supply, because Target went further in its DEI efforts, and it has a more progressive base of customers than those competitors.

This is wild move for a company on its arse anyway.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 152 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Can we add bigger offenders like Wal-Mart and Amazon?

[–] Azal@pawb.social 30 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That is the part that pisses me off so much about this. Yes. Target capitulated. Yes, Target needs to be told that's not good.

BUT WALTONS FUND THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION!

This can't be said enough, yet we can't get a days boycott on them for fucks sake!

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago

People need awareness, motivation and organization. If you can help with that, go for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comfydecal@infosec.pub 52 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Right? And why not just boycott all pubkically traded companies forever? 40 days doesn't do much

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because if you propose that, no one is actually going to do it.

Doing something is always more impactful than shooting for everything and ending up doing nothing. This is a great example of a smartly thought out mass movement; it has a specific goal, and a clearly defined set of terms. Remember, you can always expand or extend. It's far better to get a small thing moving than try to build a big thing that you never finish.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Also, 40 days is long enough that some people are going to change their shopping habits on a more permanent basis. Creating even a longer impact on Target.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago

I don't get why anyone complains about fixed term boycotts anyway. You can just add another 40 days if Target doesn't get the message. It's not like you're signing a contract or something. Boycotts are a negotiation, and in negotiation you always leave yourself wiggle room.

People love to get into this "Only the biggest possible action and nothing else" mindset, and then never actually take any action at all.

Further, a lot of dirt poor people literally rely on Walmart because Walmart was successful at gutting every other business out of their already dirt poor areas. That was literally Walmart's business model to undersell the competition until they were the only game in town, it's how they got so huge so fast. Large swathes of the South are like that. There's a reason they teach their employees how to sign up for food stamps.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Join me, I’ve been boycotting them for years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Already been boycotting target

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

My partner and I had our first children (twins) about a year ago. They're great.

Before then, I rarely if ever went to this type of store. We don't have a local Target but we have K-Mart which I think is comparable in Australia.

Honestly I think we've done pretty well at buying most of what we need second hand, and then selling it on once it's no longer required. We also get toys from a local toy library which is amazing.

That said, I've sadly become a semi-regular K-Mart shopper because I require some of the cheap plastic junk they sell. A good example is shoes, I can buy a pair of shoes for the kids for less than the cost of a cup of coffee.

The thing is, everything about the store is repulsive. It's basically a plastic shop. They sell plastic. Even the clothing and shoes is polyester and nylon and plasticised rubber. Also, since we're here, if I'm really honest about it I would have to assume that the person who made my kids shoes is probably being exploited. That sucks.

Anyhow, I don't really have a point, just having a whinge and acknowledging that target / kmart is definitely the worst part of having a child.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There's a boycott? I just don't shop there because it's the same crap as everywhere else for more money and a worse experience.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Why are people boycotting a company that tried and took a step back due to backlash instead of supporting them when they tried?

load more comments (4 replies)

Damn and here I am participating in this boycott for so long without even trying.

Target sucks.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been boycotting Target for months now

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When they took down all their pride stuff to appease the far right, I never looked back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 22 hours ago

I was boycotting them from the point where I quit the job in logistics. That job was awful.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Every one of these idiot companies pivoting to cowboy capitalism from rainbow capitalism are clueless about who actually has money in this country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iz_ok@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Hive mind, why are we mad at you target? Did a rich asshole make a shitty decision?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Been part of a boycott for decades and didn't even know

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Been boycotting them since my local one let ICE use their back parking lot to stage up and detain folks

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›