this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
87 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

45180 readers
1668 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] derrickoswald@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

OK, it's really a mathematics equivalence, rather than a scientific fact, but Euler's Identity:

e^iπ^ + 1 = 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity

it shows a profound connection between the most fundamental numbers in mathematics.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 86 points 1 week ago (8 children)

There are more hydrogen atoms in a molecule of water than there are stars in the solar system

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something should be done about this

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stop fucking clapping then

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The fact that planes are kept in the air by the shape of their wings, which forces air to go over at a pace when it can't push down on the wing as hard as it can push up from underneath. It's like discovering an exploitable glitch in a videogame and every time I fly I worry that the universe will get patched while I'm at 10,000 feet.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Tbf, you can make anything fly if you give it enough thrust. Wings just make it easier.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In a sense, everything can fly. Just sometimes not for very long.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I remember reading a couple years ago that's not actually how plane wings work. The actual way is much more complicated and hard to explain and hard to teach, so they just teach it this way because its an intuitive mental model that is "close enough" and "seems right", and it really doesn't matter unless you're a plane wing designer.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The basic way an airplane works actually is simple and intuitive: it meets the air at an angle and deflects it downward. The equal and opposite reaction to accelerating that mass of air is an upward force on the wing.

There is, of course a whole lot of finesse on top of that with differences in wing design having huge impacts on the performance and handling of aircraft due to various aerodynamic phenomena which are anything but simple or intuitive. A thin, flat wing will fly though, and balsa wood toy airplanes usually use exactly that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)#Simplified_physical_explanations_of_lift_on_an_airfoil

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A Planck length is the smallest length possible, a smaller length simply can't exist.

At least that's what scientists believed until they studied OPs penis, then they found out something smaller does in fact exist.

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude! I told you in confidence not to share that info.

I guess I have no choice but to share that @spittingimage@lemmy.world has the world's biggest human anus. It's been a scientific mystery about how it got to be so big.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I said out loud at a Warhammer convention that space marines are just dolls for grown men.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eponymous_anonymous@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Retinal photosynthesis, also known as the Purple Earth Theory. Colours are weird. Earth plants absorb red and blue light, they look green to us because that’s the wavelength of light that cannot be used by the chloroplasts.

It’s hypothesized that this was advantageous on Earth because blue light goes further into water than the other wavelengths, facilitating the development of photosynthetic algae

Retinal photosynthesis is another viable chemical chain reaction that could be used to create ATP (usable biological energy) from light.

It’s another molecule similar to chlorophyll, but it absorbs green light instead of red/blue - alien planets might be purple!

There’s a viable parallel evolutionary pathway that leads to plants with magenta leaves

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When the moon is at its farthest orbit from earth, all of the planets in the solar system can fit in between earth and the moon.

[–] Janovich@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just in general how spread apart everything is in space is wild. As big as planets and stars are, there’s still unfathomably more nothing in between them all. And that’s in a solar system where it’s comparatively “dense” compared to interstellar space let alone intergalactic. It makes the vastness of the ocean look tiny.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For me, it's the sheer scale of celestial bodies.

Our Sun is humongous. UY Scuti's radius is 1700 times larger - 185300 times larger than the Earth's. And then there's TON 618, which has a mass 66 billion times larger than our Sun's.

And even those are barely grains of sand when compared to solar and galactic structures... It is humbling, to say the least.

Edit 2: I deleted the previous edit, because my first observation is correct (scale is maintained when going from comparing radii to comparing diameters...), which is why I have an Arts degree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

the implication of einsteins mass-energy equivalence formula is mind-blowing to me. one gram of mass, if perfectly converted to energy, makes 25 GWh. that means half the powerplants in my country could be replaced with this theoretical "mass converter" going through a gram of fuel an hour. that's under 10 kilograms of fuel a year.

a coal plant goes through tons of fuel a day.

energy researchers, get on it

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (12 children)

What do you think fusion research is?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a fancier way to spin turbines with steam

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Because this is a science thread I'll be a bit pedantic. Mostly because I think it's an interesting topic. It's a mass-energy equivalence (≡) and not just an equality (=) they are the same thing.

So it's meaningless to say convert mass into energy. It's like saying I want to convert this stick from being 12 inches long to being 1 foot long.

You can convert matter (the solid form of energy) into other types of energy that are not solid. But the mass stays the same.

It's like when people say a photon is massless. It has energy and therefor mass. It just has no rest mass. So from the photons frame of reference no mass but from every other fame of reference there is mass.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The size of the universe and the distance between everything in it. It takes about 8 minutes for light from our own sun to reach us. And the observable universe is about 5,859,000,000,000,000,000 times larger than that! That is quite a trip. I would need about 293,283,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 charging stops with my electric car to get to the end. I think I’ll pass.

(Someone smarter than me will probably find out that my math is wrong)

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

What I find mind blowing about the scale of the universe, is that on a logarithmic scale from the smallest possible thing to the largest possible thing, humans live at almost the exact centre.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dunno whether it counts: but that science has effectively cured AIDS.

In 2004, 2.1m people died from it. Twenty years later that figure was a little over a quarter at 630k. The goal for 2025 is 250k. I think that's absolutely remarkable.

As a child in the 80s I was terrified of AIDS. It made me low-key scared of gay men because the news made it sound like I could I could get it from any one of them. And here we now are, able to provide a medication that can almost completely ensure that you will never be infected by HIV.

Astonishing, really.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

You can observe the chirality of some molecules from the crystals they form, sometimes they twist clockwise, other times they twist counter clockwise. Which way they twist is dependent on their molecular structure.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

That time passes differently in galaxies with different gravities. One of these galaxies is Mormon heaven.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The fact that there is no discernable difference between an alive body or a dead body when it comes to chemical makeup.

All the pieces are there. All the atoms and molecules are still in the same places. Yet despite this the body is still dead.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

When you say "All the atoms and molecules are still in the same places", I can't say I agree. It is the change of chemical composition that renders our body dead. Or should I say, death is defined to be such a chemical composition.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If math is actually uncovering fundamental laws of the universe, rather than just describing it at various scales, then there's a chance we can rewrite reality with our own set of rules that would render the current ones incompatible (by Gödel's-IT).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Tegmark's MUH is the hypothesis that our external physical reality is a mathematical structure.[3] That is, the physical universe is not merely described by mathematics, but is mathematics — specifically, a mathematical structure.

Look, I only heard about this concept, so maybe there's more to it, but branches of mathematics are just a set of rules that we create.

Sometimes these rules can be applied to real systems, in our reality, and that helps to describe and understand the universe.

But it's totally possible to come up with infinite nonsensical, useless mathematical systems that have nothing to do with the universe. The existence of these doesn't mean that we have or could rewrite reality.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That our species took millions of years of evolution and the chance for it to be exactly this way was so infinitesimal... And yet here we are, chasing arbitrary numbers on paper-slices and in some bank-account while also being sexists, racists, whatever-ists and destroying the very rock we exist on. Yet things like star trek are called utopia not actual-ia.

This always baffle me.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›