this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
1251 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6275 readers
2206 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...because it's really important that meteorology calculations are done with the correct conservative perspective, lest you predict the weather in too woke a way or start believing in climate change and other elitist liberal dogma?

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

When will you folks learn to appreciate the artistic license used to tell a larger Truth? ^^^/$

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

He's such a dumb shit.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"Hey we're going into town to throw rotting fruit at the billionaire, wanna come?"

"Yeah, just lemme grab something outta my freezer first."

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What happened to the right to speak the truth?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

It's not the left to speak.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their truth.

Their alternative facts.

The actual truth is for snowflakes and liberals to get upset over.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 12 points 15 hours ago

This. All these losers champion free speech absolutism, and yet every single one of them tries their hardest to shut down dissent.

They know the slower among us will rally around the idea without thinking about it too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm honestly getting real fuckin fed up with this country

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

Good. I’m ready when you are, brother.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (15 children)

From the same people who scream and bitch and moan about their right of free speech. It's only their right apparently.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 72 points 1 day ago (9 children)

A lot of people here thinking the USA is speed running fascism here.

No, the USA was always an inspiration to fascism (just ask the remaining Native Americans as an example).

That's why it was able to adopt into it so quick. Not that hard to change a car to gasoline if it was already running on diesel.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 37 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Not that hard to change a car to gasoline if it was already running on diesel.

Is almost a good analogy, but that's not so easy 😅

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Frying fat would have been better, because most older diesels run on it out of the box.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 181 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They really are speedrunning fascism this time around. They did have plenty of time to prepare out in the open and gained public support with no long term repercussions.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 98 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Remember when trump said he had no idea what project 2025 was and that he had no intention of implementing it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] callyral@pawb.social 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

ah, freedom of speech at its finest

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Not supporting this but freedom of speech is freedom from prosecution. If you are flipping burgers and tell a customer your favorite category of adult film, your getting fired.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

From what I searched, the meteorologist criticized Elon Musk on her private social media, not while working.

If you're flipping burgers, and later you get home and post online on a personal account about your favorite category of adult film, it's none of your employer's business.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I totally agree. Still nothing to do with freedom of speech itself. The 1st amendment.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I meant free speech, not the 1st amendment (I'm not even from the US). The concept of freedom of speech is relevant to this situation.

I believe that a company threatening to fire its employees based on an opinion they had in private or in a personal social media account is wrong. I imagine this isn't necessarily against the law, but should still be acknowledged as a form of censorship.

Of course, there are certain opinions that are absurd or even illegal(?). if a company relies on public image of its employees (not sure if i phrased this correctly) then there are situations where it's reasonable to fire the employee for an opinion, but since it's regarding opinions, this would be very difficult or impossible to define legally while still being fair.

I'm not exactly sure what my point is anymore so I'm just gonna stop arguing, but I'll maybe read some other threads for some insight on the situation

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I do agree though some jobs like a meteorologist means you are on tv and affect the reputation of your business. You can't have actors on your TV show expressing opinions on social media that affect your bottom line. It's bad for business which means you can be fired. All about money sadly. That's censorship though, not freedom of speech unless your country has a different definition of the phrase than the U.S.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Freedom of speech and the First Amendment are two different things.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Freedom of speech is just that, free from government interference(look it up). You are referring to censorship.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Yep you are free to call out fascist your employer supports. And your employer is unfortunately free you to fire you. No free speech violations there. Now if they called in the government to take you off to a camp to be exterminated or re-educated. Once the government becomes involved it's most definitely a free speech / human rights violation. Will get there soon enough. Still plenty of reason to be outraged.

load more comments
view more: next ›