this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
577 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

60476 readers
4148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 7 hours ago

I think it would also be fair to say that anyone who doesn't is also virtue signaling.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 hours ago

Why didn't he just say anyone who quits Meta smells like poo-poo and pee-pee? That would at least be funny.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 34 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No its called having morals and standing by them. Virtue signaling is when you pay lip-service to a cause and don't walk the walk. Almost like zuck doing his dei stuff when it was popular and doing a 180 as soon as it becomes slightly unpopular.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I think it is quite beautiful to see how much <some politically, even if self-perceived, powerful person who is a moral trashheap> falls into the usual strong narcisism tendencies of projection.

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I virtue signaled 7 years ago when the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal broke, realizing that Facebook is a seedy company that can't be trusted.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Same, also, Zuckerberg has always been a sketch ball who does anti-social and user hostile things with his app, so it was just years of being fed up with that. 2017 was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.

[–] penguinclaw@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] five82@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Zuck is a fucking piece a shit. But the headline and article misrepresents what he was saying. His actual quote was "Some people may leave our platforms for virtue signaling" and appears to be directed towards users, not Meta employees.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Nah man, clearly you missed the memo that we now just take every statement out of it's obvious context and straw man the shit out of everything.

It hurts every real argument against these people when people make stupid arguments like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 13 hours ago

"Signaled" my "virtue" in 2016. Fuck you, zuck.

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 32 points 17 hours ago

he means 'is showing virtue'. And he's right.

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Your hubris is showing, Fuckerberg.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who calls him that. Same think.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

When I was a teen, I thought anyone who joins it is virtue signaling.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s kinda crazy how fast he’s unraveling into the right-wing griftersphere. Does Thiel or Putin have something on him?

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

maybe he just feels comfortable letting the facade drop

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 11 points 11 hours ago

Exactly. Zucc was always a POS. I mean, FB got its start so he could rate the "hotties" on campus...

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 31 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The title alone shows admittance that leaving Meta signals virtue and good character.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 39 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why should I care what a self confessed pedophile thinks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Will this decade be known as "the decade when billionares spiralled out of control"? First Musk then this android.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 17 points 17 hours ago

Imagine what Rockefeller and Carnegie would have tweeted about. You know they were crass, detached from reality hemorrhoid clusters, they just didn't get to spew it to a global audience 900 times a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

isn't this giant sack of shit laying off like 1000 employees?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 42 points 21 hours ago

Joke's on him. I quit before it was Meta.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

Oh no, not virtue signaling! There truly is no greater crime! Specifically, it isn't worse to be an overly-built, soulless chia pet if that's what you're thinking. Definitely not.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 192 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Banning gender-neutral bathrooms and spinning to anti-woke isn't virtue signalling...

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s vice signaling. There’s nothing virtuous about Meta or Zuckerberg. Let’s not forget his first try was a hot or not clone with pictures of women he used without consent.

And that new perm he got definitely isn’t virtuous.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Out of the loop here, so let me get this straight: Did they build gender-neutral bathrooms that are now gendered by placing a sticker on the door? What on earth could be the purpose of that?

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago

gendered by placing a sticker on the door

We have that at my work, but they are still gender-neutral bathrooms when the other one is in use and someone needs to use it. You can’t really ungender-neutral those bathrooms.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Wow, I knew Zuckerberg was a jerk and I knew he was right wing. But I didn’t think he was one of those rightwing immature edgelord jerks on the level of 4chan posters

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago

He wasn't. Mark used to be a sweet kid, but he's been radicalised by all the shit he reads on Facebook. It's not too late, Mark, delete your social media profiles, stay away from that poisonous hellhole!

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Nah these billionaires don’t align on the modern left wing right wing spectrum, they are all a special kind of hardcore libertarian. The only ideology they have is that they should be able to do whatever they want to earn their next billion. Him appeasing right wingers fits his MO, but doesn’t make him a right winger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToastySaff@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

“Some people may leave our platforms for virtue signaling, but I think the vast majority and many new users will find that these changes make the products better”

So he's stripping away protections for marginalised groups to appeal to the "vast majority" who, by definition, don't need these protections and are in no way negatively impacted by their existence. Got it, and fuck you very much.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 126 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using the phrase "virtue signaling" is virtue signaling

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago

The fact that this clown even felt the need to talk about this shows that a noteworthy number of people are leaving the platform.

It's a slow burn, but legacy social media must die.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 58 points 23 hours ago

Why, yes, Im signaling that I have virtues, which is why I am not on your site Zuckerboi.

[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 38 points 22 hours ago

Ah yes, the feed starting with an ad, followed by a reels module alternating between soft porn and dogs, followed by bots and more ads, maybe interspersed with a couple of posts by people whose names I recognize for good measure, are well worth my time. No need to virtue signal, I'm hooked!

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 115 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What should we call blatant pandering to Trump and his ilk? MAGA signaling?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 23 hours ago

Kind of like wearing a red MAGA hat.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Well firstly, virtue signaling is not fundamentally a bad thing. Devil is in the details.

Second, that's kinda rich coming from the guy who's been nothing but virtue signaling towards the upcoming Trump admin since his failed assassination attempt.

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 33 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, his wife has definitely served him divorce papers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

This is exactly the kind of thing a loser would say. Loser CEOs are always whining about people leaving their platform. Winners keep their head down and build something their users actually enjoy using.

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

Bruh they're taking action. It's virtue actioning. Unless you're trying to tell them they need to do something more dramatic?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 18 hours ago

Maybe saying you’re quitting meta is “virtue signalling” but actually quitting is virtuous.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

No, shit for brains, giving up your job is an actual commitment. Virtue signaling is a token gesture that costs you nothing - like throwing a million dollars at an inauguration party when you're worth billions.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›