this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
1442 points (98.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27166 readers
3320 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 154 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

Housing is a basic human need, it shouldn’t be allowed to be only an investment. With the other items, you can just say “so don’t buy it”, which is not possible with housing, you have to pay for it, even of you wouldn’t like to.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

fumo is a basic human need

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 135 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

The worst thing about this is that housing is essential, while all the other things aren't. Scalpers only take advantage of other people's shopping addiction, while these so-called "investors" take advantage of other people's basic needs.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

That's why they are held in higer regard

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

👏👏👏

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll add to that: The PlayStation etc scalpers at least give you a still-new product at the inflated price. The landlords rent it out for additional income and THEN sell it at a profit.

So it's more like buying a PS5 for $500, having somebody rent to play it for $100/mo, then selling it for $800 after a year

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 93 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They're all pieces of shit and deserve to be kicked out an airlock into deep space.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 45 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

The commonality here is how expensive the things are. Scalping is another one of those things that's trashy if you're poor and classy if you're rich.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

Scalper no Scalping!

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

There should be a hard limit of houses you can buy. Two by default (the one you live in and one you can rent to someone, maybe with a requirement that you need to live there occasionally) and an additional one for each child if he or she doesn't have one yet.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem is most houses are being bought by huge companies, not people.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We should really start by limiting that. If we start treating housing as a basic right, which we should, there's zero reason a company should be allowed to own housing to profit off of. It's a far bigger problem than my landlady who owns five flats. We can talk about limits for people like her later.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 weeks ago

For sure. But we don't even consider water a basic right and concede unlimited water rights to mega corporations before reserving water access to the local population. So I have no hope for that to happen with housing...

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

They are using advanced algorithms to find the best prices for in demand properties based on profit percentages. Its become so ridiculous corpos are buying houses before individuals can even bid or have access. They buy them in lots at a time. Even using the same algos to place offers on existing properties where people live. Its ludicrous.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In Cuba they have a law that requires you to sell your house if you buy a new one. That also means you can't be a landlord or else you yourself would be homeless. They also have a law that guarantees that if you don't own your own home, you at least get public housing guaranteed, which has rent capped at 10% of income so it can never exceed that. They have the lowest homelessness rate in all of the Americas.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And they're guaranteeing this super affordable public housing all while under a comprehensive trade embargo for 60+ years imposed by the most powerful nation there is, who also happens to be their neighbor.

Never believe that housing "needs" to be expensive, it's 100% a decision made by people who profit from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

First 5 investment properties should carry a 1% property income tax that is directly funneled into a housing development program, then a 5% property income tax on the next 5, 10% on the next 10...

Realestate is the safest and highest yield investment working people can make to build generational wealth. Dont cut the throat of the guy who can afford a brand new Audi to spite the guy who has to decide between wether his driver fetches the Rolls or the Bentley.

People should be able to aspire to being rich, just not filthy rich.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The problem is the taking beyond their need, not if it's many doing a little bit each or a few doing a lot each.

A swarm of locusts still leaves you with nothing to eat, even if each one only takes a bit (and unlike people buying a handful of houses to profit from merely owning them, the locusts only eat what they need).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It always impresses me how much people worship landlords, even Canada up there is having a housing crisis but nobody dares question the sanctity of landlords. You can watch both the major parties arguing for hours and nobody ever brings up landlordism once. A lot of them choose to instead become hostile to immigrants, both parties moving further right on immigration because stopping immigration or potentially even kicking out immigrants to them is more acceptable than questioning the sanctity of landlords. You also saw a similar thing here in the USA, I remember after the Trump/Kamala debate when they revealed the plans for bringing housing prices down and Trump was "mass deportation" and Kamala was "a tax credit." Not sure about every country definitely here in US and Canada, people here treat landlords like unquestionable deities, the idea that their right to rule should even be called into question is not even something that passes through most people's heads.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

One thing that started here in New Zealand was reporting on and ranking their portfolio sizes (lots had it tied up in an estate or trust, but that connection was able to be reported on - even if it might be 'co-owned by the family').

We still have huge problems in this area but the noble few that don't 'stand out like a dogs bollocks' and all the others just looked like the same bunch of psycho/sellouts

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At least in the case of fumos these days they're made-to-order. Buying 10 of them isn't snatching 10 of them from the carts of other potential buyers, it just means 10 more fumos will be made. If anything it's strictly increasing the supply and making them more accessible to people who couldn't make the preorder window.

This was absolutely not the case a few years ago, though. And just because you're technically not scalping doesn't mean you can't still wildly overcharge.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Seeing alot of touhou in the fediverse lately.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Touhou will take over the world!

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, Zun will force people to play touhou on lunatic mode /j

[–] 211@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think most of you are underestimating the cost of housing maintenance. We had some bad luck and a couple of structurally necessary renos were bigger than initially thought, or didn't address the issue as well as we hoped, requiring new renos. In the last 20 years we've paid the cost of our townhouse apartment once over, easy. And now the bathroom, kitchen, and flooring could use an upgrade (25-50 years old), which is again expensive. In that time its value has risen maybe 50%, not quite keeping pace with local inflation.

Not complaining, we bought it for living in and it's been great for that, and now that everything is at the end of its lifespan is a good time to really make it ours. But house prices aren't rising insanely everywhere, house upkeep isn't free (there are always "modifications"), and at least here the average ROI for being a landlord is abt 4-6%, same as stocks lately, and that's assuming no major surprises.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you only own one house, it sucks to have luck like that. But, it’s like the dips in stock prices - overall, the value of the whole market goes up over time. Those treating homes as investments tend to buy in the demand areas, where a few lofty renovations don’t dent their bottom line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Not sure I see the relevance. Yes, housing maintenance costs money, what's the relevance? Who says housing upkeep is free? What's the relevance to anything at all?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is how I learn there's a lego death star now?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

you haven't seen spider man?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›