this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
345 points (95.5% liked)

News

23634 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 131 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Thanks for this! The bullet ballot thing seemed odd but without any real access to information about actual counts I didn't know what to think of it.

Good to know it's more than likely nonsense and we just really suck as a nation and did let Trump win legitimately. :/

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 119 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yeah, he won through good old misinformation, propaganda, and blatant lies because his opposition can't keep the successful message of hope and change going to engage apathetic voters like Obama did and would instead rather pal around with Liz Cheney and Netanyahu to try and peel away MAGA voters.

While voter suppression and Republican election meddling is a real issue, our country sucking is the real underlying problem. We couldn't even do a fucking thing about the insurrection four years ago.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yup. They had a hook with Walz and the 'weird' talking points. That seemed to really resonate with the Republicans and made them go out of their way to highlight out weird they were.

Then they pivoted to try and win Republicans. And... they died.

'Weird' probably wouldn't have won them the election or anything, but it was working. It could have been paired with good, short talking points about helping people, and Walz is a good enough, and genuine enough (or at least appears to be so) guy to really sell those talking points in a way that didn't feel pandering or cynical.

But they really wanted that right-wing vote. It's like right-wingers telling the Democrats that they'll never vote for them just makes the Dems want to win them over that much more.

It's wild.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She could have said "medicare for all" once, instead of turning her back on the progressive left and she would have won.

She could have said, "Gazan's are human beings, and its important that all US allies receiving aid are in compliance with the Leahy law.." instead of turning her back on the anti-war left and Muslims and Arabs, and she would have won.

She could have said "The efforts of 4 years of recovering from the pandemic were hard, but clearly we need to do better for US taxpayers who are still feeling economic hardship", instead of spitting in the face of Americans by telling us the economy is great, when those Americans are having to put groceries back on the shelves because they simply can't afford them.

The campaign was a disaster. Harris was a turd in a punch bowl of a candidate and with even some basic, basic strategy she could have steered through the wickets. It was actually an easy election to win. At the turn of the tide Trump was almost as unpopular as Biden. She blew it at every possible turn.

Lessons learned for the electorate: STOP FUCKING LISTENING TO MSNBC, CNN, NPR, ALL OF THEM!

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But... but... but... Have you seen the stock market? The line's going up! Economy's fine!!1!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you are touching on some real issues, BUT the Harris campaign never said that the economy was doing great. They very deliberately avoided that message (though Biden was very different).

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They very deliberately avoided that message (though Biden was very different).

So did they repudiate Biden when he did that? If not, that's tantamount to agreeing with him.

And the voters knew it.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s partly the way that non-Trump campaigns are run. They hire a ton of pollsters/consultants that do focus groups to find out voters points of view. They never consider the scenario in which a good candidate can change the worldview of the voters. So it sounds like the candidate never had an original thought in the world, when voters actually want a leader.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah I think that we have been subjected to such abnormal politics for so many years now, that people either forget, or weren't alive to remember, that none of this is normal, and campaigns used to be very different.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If anyone couldn't see how Trump would be worse than Harris, that is honestly their fault. And now we are seeing the proof of that. It wasn't a hypothetical, we already experienced Trump once, and we're being proven right about him again. This isn't a failing of the DNC to inform people of this, they screamed it at the top of their lungs. They said it during the debates. I was jazzed to vote Harris and keep that asshole away from office. But to enough people, things like that didn't matter and they voted against their best interests, and now things are going to get substantially worse than if they voted Harris.

If anyone couldn't remember what life was like 4 years ago during the pandemic (and throughout Trump's first presidency), that's on them. I honestly can't care about people's issues with the DNC when we're faced with an entirely worse option like Trump. The time for fighting to reform the DNC is during midterms where grassroots candidates can gain traction without threat of us losing it all. Allowing a much smaller volume of complaints about the DNC to take precedent over the tremendous evil Trump presents is a failing of the voters and is why we need the department of education more than ever. This is our brexit.

Building back our institutions after this is going to be much more difficult than it is tearing them down. If Democrats win the next election, I wonder if they're going to be blamed for not fixing things fast enough after their predecessor... Like, oh I dunno... The economy?

https://www.epi.org/blog/the-trump-administration-was-ruining-the-pre-covid-19-19-economy-too-just-more-slowly/

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So many fucking people here desperate to absolve themselves of their idiotic decision to vote for Trump, a third party, or not at all. They desperately want to believe that Democrats would be just as bad, and that it's the DNC's fault that they chose to ignore the dozens of people who explained to them exactly why they were making a bad choice.

Anything to avoid taking responsibility.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Just before the election I was still coming across people absolutely incensed that Biden hadn't fixed the college loan issue yet.

The fact that it kept getting blocked by Trump judges was completely fucking lost on them. OK cool... Now he gets to appoint more. That should help /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (10 children)

They said it during the debates. I was jazzed to vote Harris and keep that asshole away from office. But to enough people, things like that didn’t matter and they voted against their best interests, and now things are going to get substantially worse than if they voted Harris.

I was excited up to and including the debate. Then everything she did after killed that excitement and I ended up voting for her and Walz only to vote against Trunp. Not because I wanted her in office, and I can see why people stopped caring.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, he won through good old misinformation, propaganda, and blatant lies

You forgot voter suppression and gerrymandering. There is an old saying that in amerika, the politicians pick their voters... which is literally the opposite of democracy.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

No I didn't forget, you just stopped reading.

While voter suppression and Republican election meddling is a real issue, our country sucking is the real underlying problem. We couldn’t even do a fucking thing about the insurrection four years ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, he won through good old misinformation, propaganda, and blatant lies because his opposition can't keep the successful message of hope and change going to engage apathetic voters like Obama did and would instead rather pal around with Liz Cheney and Netanyahu to try and peel away MAGA voters.

The thing is, people on the left tend to actually care about ethics, so if Democrats started doing the dirty shit that Republicans do, they would get voted out of office and held accountable.

It is an insurmountable hurdle. As much as I want to win, I don't want the type of person that is willing to do the shit that Republicans do, in order to do so. I would no longer consider it a win then.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For non Americans: The bullet ballot is special voting process used in some rural areas, where they hang effigies of politicians up at a range, and issue a box of bullets to each voter. The voters then line up and fire their bullets at the politicians they hate the most. The politician with the fewest holes in them at the end of the day is declared the winner.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 88 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The letter, which was spammed on Lemmy and deleted multiple times, just linked to other SubStack blogs as “evidence”. Come on, people

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I was disappointed in the lack of critical thinking skills in those threads. I thought Lemmy users were smarter than that. Hopefully we can put all these conspiracies to bed.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a sizable number of people intentionally looking the other way because they think they can fight fire with fire, utilizing the same conspiracy theory thinking that the Right routinely gets away to shape public discourse.

I have to say, the thought crossed my mind. But Dems could never pull it off.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have to say, the thought crossed my mind. But Dems could never pull it off.

I would hope that's because we won't stand for it. All I could think reading one of the previous threads on this letter was "these people are just as dumb as MAGAs but in the other direction".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

People are idiots everywhere.

Everybody is an idiot sometimes.

Even you.

Not me tho. Thankfully I'm flawless and don't have to deal with the same nonsense of ever being wrong.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All I see is the poster on Fox Mulder's wall that said "I want to believe."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wanted it to be true so bad, and sure there were some illegal actions taken (Elmo), it's not enough to overturn anything. It's okay to feel defeated, but not to ignore facts. We lost.

Side note, watch Veritasium's video on "smarter people get this question wrong", it talks about how your political position can blind your critical thinking skills and is important to remember. You can take nothing at face value, even your own thoughts.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago

Anyone convinced they're immune to propaganda, bias or plain human error is extremely vulnerable to being wrong and never realising it.

Relatedly: One of the easiest mistakes to make regarding fields you're no expert in is to underestimate just how much there is to know that you don't (or maybe nobody does). I'm very prone to that one, personally.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What the fuck is this stroke of a title?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The claims made in a 'duty to warn' letter addressed to presidential nominee Kamala Harris are - according to our research - misleading.

Sorry, but this is standard journalistic practice. The sentence is correct english, even in its unedited form, albeit in the same way that buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is correct english.

I do think it's a practice that needs to be reconsidered in the interest of making journalism more accessible to everyone, but for now you just gotta learn how to read it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

The whole article does read as a google translate from another language. Is so hard to follow. Still the article only cites Spoonamore had wrong numbers cause later came more accurate ones. It does not address the main issue that the bullet votes are higher than other elections. Still I'm taking everyone involved with a grain of salt.I guess that sadly we'll never know the truth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the difference. Both the right and the left have their cranks, but the ones on the left never get mainstream acceptance. While on the right, they make the crank president.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Because the left is, for the most part, intellectually honest enough to be skeptical of broad claims that seem too good to be true. Even ones that ostensibly benefit them.

While the right just grabs hold with both hands at anything they read immediately and start plastering it all over social media.

One side has the most basic critical thinking skills, and one side is lacking in that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

People need to accept who we are, collectively, as a country. We chose this shit. It’ll be a wild ride.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spoonamore doesn't have shit and has admitted as much when pressed. The guy basically contests results that he does not like. He also does not know what a bullet ballot is. That term deals with ranked choice elections where someone only picks top candidates. The term he is looking for is undervoting.

I get it. When you are shown the enthusiasm at Harris' rallies and how absolutely batshit Trump is, it's pretty easy to conclude that the election must have been tampered with. But there is no evidence that it was directly tampered with. Republicans do a lot of shit to mess with votes but that is all known shit like making voting more difficult in certain areas, gerrymandering, voter roll purges, etc. They are not directly tampering with the presidential election on a mass scale nor are they competent enough to.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I was expecting it to look like a close race where Trump would cheat using the courts.

That didn't happen.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Thank you! I just needed someone to check that dudes math, very happy they did.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

North Carolina

Spoonamore alleged that the purported hacking and fraud in North Carolina proved to be "the most extreme" and that "the public results indicate over 350,000 voters cast a ballot for Trump and no other race." However, this is false. 

According to the North Carolina State Board of Elections' website, as of Nov. 21, 5,722,556 voters cast ballots. Of those, 5,699,152 ballots displayed votes in the race for president. The website also reported that 5,592,243 ballots bore votes for the state's governor's race. A comparison of the numbers for total votes and the gubernatorial race would reveal the maximum number of possible "bullet vote" ballots for all presidential candidates. The difference between the two numbers is 130,313 votes — a count nowhere near the 350,000 votes stated by Spoonamore. Trump received 183,048 more of North Carolinian's votes than Harris.

Welp.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

That's not how this works folks. You are supposed to ignore all evidence to the contrary, then spend the next 4 years claiming the election was stolen and whining like a spoiled toddler

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

He told a good, plausible story. The count claims were the first thing I was going to verify, and Snopes pointed right to the actual source.

[–] YippieKyeAy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I’ve been peaking back on Reddit to a few sub reddits, r/somethingiswrong2024 is the main one. There’s r/verify2024 and r/houstonwade as well that have some interesting ideas and points brought up about all this. They simply dismissed this snopes report, stating snopes had lost credibility over the past years but not sure how true that is. I don’t know if I was just getting a contact high from the copium over there, I have hope still, I want to believe there is something in the works but ultimately without concrete, indisputable, outright blatant cheating thoroughly documented, there’s not chance of overturning the election. Especially without stirring up the magats nest and causing civil unrest. So do we just stick it out for the next two years and hope we can freely vote and try to gain some sanity back into this country?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I feel like the folks who felt super justified in not voting are now obsessive on this. but. but. other people were supposed to get us the democrat against our will....

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yeah, we're the people that always love to talk about evidence. So, let's make sure we're applying that principle evenly and demanding and looking at evidence for claims we like the sound and feeling of.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›