Maybe it's not a good idea to use a media platform run by a megalomaniac moron as a primary source of news and information.
a media platform run by a megalomaniac moron
The one with a rocket program. Oh wait...
The one who's a billionaire. Oh wait...
It's a great timeline .... 99% of the planet relies on megalomaniac morons, mega corporations, billionaires and for profit media corporations for all their information.
And we wonder why there is so much misinformation, disinformation, non information and covered up information everywhere.
It's definitely the information age .... expect no one said it would actually keep us informed or have any benefit to humanity.
It's a great timeline .... 99% of the planet relies on megalomaniac morons, mega corporations, billionaires and for profit media corporations for all their information.
Same as it ever was
A 100 years ago you got your morning paper that can give you a set of tainted views, because you had no chance to independently check, what is going on on the other side of the world. Now you got Fox news and others shoving down the propaganda narrative with a different set of "experts" 24/7.
Fair, but this article is talking about primary information from people who are actually there and small local news outlets being drowned out by misinformation. A lot of primary information in 2023 comes from social media which is then investigated and fact checked by larger and more reputable news outlets before being reported.
So yes, the average person who just wants to know what's happening should not be getting that info from social media but reporters often have to. Changes to Twitter since musk took over (specifically paid blue check marks and the removal of titles from links) have made the process of sifting through the misinformation and disinformation exponentially harder, even for people who do it for a living like the researcher in the article.
It's not just TwitX, there's a bunch on Lemmy and Reddit feeds too
If you're getting your information from facebook, twitter or fox news (to name a few top offenders) you're in for a bad time.
And if a significant enough portion of the people are getting their information from those sources, we're all in for a bad time.
More like: we're all in for a bad time.
Unfortunately, their inability to discern fantasy from reality does not only affect them.
I think another big issue is that there are a lot of news outlets that get their info from those three sources.
X is a far-right nazi sympathizing website. Advertisers should have pulled their products a year ago
Assume companies that advertise on Xitter to be NAZI sympathizers.
Xitler the X is pronounced like "sh"
People who have turned to X for breaking news
Maybe they shouldn't
One of the few benefits that Twitter used to have was how useful it was for breaking news and events.
At this point the Onion has more accurate news than X
X is the new toilet of the internet. Go X yourself
In fairness… People who turn to twitter for news aren’t the type of people that generally like to be informed by reality.
It certainly became worse, but it's not like it was good before him.
Stay away from that echo chamber
Stay away from that echo chamber
Stay away from that echo chamber
Stay away from that echo chamber
Stay away
Stay away way ~way~ ~wa~
Honestly I blame the news orgs for this.
There are a ton of videos floating around that ARE credible. They simply aren't getting reported on in a meaningful way. If they do get mentioned, it's often in an extremely watered down manner that almost feels intentionally misleading.
You also have videos that are 100 percent verifiable (or the protest videos) that are only being reported on by a few organizations, often leaving out important context.
If the mainstream media refuses to truly engage in the situation, then people will turn to dubious sources.
I mean, that's just the other side of the same coin. They need good info to dig through, and they need to actually dig. Both are required for actual journalism, and both don't work under capitalism. There's too much money in lies, and it's expensive to fight them in the first place.
I disagree with the headline, the war is not causing disinformation. Its bad faith users posting disinformation and ~~X's ~~ (nope still calling it Twitter) policies that not only let it happen but encourage it.
If you went to Twitter pre-Musk for your news you're still a moron.
It was the social media of choice for journalists. It was an excellent place to get your news as long as you followed the right people (reputable, credible professionals).
Now many of those right people have left and they're far more difficult to distinguish from the wrong people.
Imagine clicking on a video thinking it’s footage of current events and it’s from a game.
Imagine not being at all media-savvy and buying into it. MAGA types are idiot shitheads who are completely driven by their emotions. There’s no higher function.
Oh no, please tell me this isn't true. Surely the well balanced and entirely rational Mr. Musk wouldn't let this happen?
Who are these articles for because everyone I know has always had the opinion that Twitter is full of dumb takes and misinfo
Millions and millions of people who are still using it as their primary info source.
Good that you apparently don't know any of them, but the number of people who actually stopped using TwitX or use it less appears to be shockingly small.
Yeah unfortunately my friends use tiktok as their primary source so I can't give them to much credit.
That seems...significantly worse.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
