this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
199 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

58013 readers
3348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The ancient halo comedy sketch thing? They weren't still making those, surely?

Could the advert revenue not be decreasing because fewer people are watching old niche Halo content these days?

Ah well either way, I wish them the best. Those videos certainly gave me a bit of a chuckle :-)

[–] idogoodjob@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe I saw they were still making them recently.

Also they may be talking about ad revenue per view, which would take into account decreased viewership

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I think the most recent season was supposed to be the last, though they're sunsetting a lot of things these days (RIP Achievement Hunter) so I could easily be confused.

[–] PoetSII@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The final season™ is in production now after a couple year hiatus.

Main storyline ended back in like 2014 iirc, then they had an anthology non-Canon season of a bunch of different animation styles which was really neat, and then like 3 seasons of weird virtual production unreal engine stuff that I don't think is Canon?

Either way it's still being made, but it's the end. Allegedly.

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Distributed content is always good, just hope they have a good way to drive traffic to their site.

Back in the day this was how all Internet content was

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’d love to see a comeback of this.

But it does seem that the web as Toni’s today is dying. There is no better time tech wise to do things the old way.

[–] trash@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Toni's today?

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago

The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The soft filter makes me think 90's FOX sci-fi, but this seems to be a Halo reference. Wut?

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think this was actually from Babylon 5

Edit:

Yep, the vorlons

https://aliens.fandom.com/wiki/Vorlon

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Solid work, fine person. I knew it looked like one of those, but I only watched TNG.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's on iirc Pluto at the moment with Andromeda both bad scifi classics even with Kevin sorbo being a real doucheapotomous.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Honestly, this is probably a good move. I think we're going to see more and more of this happening in the future. Self hosted media platforms that can partner with other streaming services, that's my guess as to what will happen. Ironically right back to what life was before YouTube, the main difference now is that self hosting is much cheaper and easier these days comparatively.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

... So they're going back to what they started with. Good for them.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Well you don't have to spend three hours downloading a 240p .mov file, so its a little different.

[–] owatnext@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Damn. Didn't realize RvB was still going? I wonder if it is still as funny as I thought it was in high school.

[–] ThatHermanoGuy@midwest.social 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 22 points 11 months ago

Look, I know you don't know me, but you have to believe what I'm about to tell you. Sometime in your future, I get stationed here in Blood Gulch and we meet. And this guy here, he gets promoted to Sergeant of the red army and we spy on them. And they get this new jeep and I'm all like, "There is no way you can pick up chicks in a tank!"

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the headline reads like a schizophrenic wrote it.

I understand they are english words but this makes no sense to me.

[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need you to go to the store and get two quarts of elbow grease… and, uh, pick up some... headlight fluid for the Puma too.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

They only had this flag...

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So, rather than having some revenue coming in from YouTube, they’d rather force everyone to use their own website? Do they not understand that not everyone watches YouTube on a computer? Some exclusively use the YouTube app on their phones, TVs, or game consoles.

I dunno. It’s not as if it costs them anything to host the videos on YouTube. Seems odd to completely cut off a revenue source like that.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The trouble is, if the have the content on YouTube, people will just watch that - even if RT asks them not to. People will always take the most comfortable path to a goal, if they only host on their site, then anyone who wants to watch their stuff has to go on their apps or their website.

Basically they're betting that they have a loyal enough fan base to follow them off YouTube, but recognizing that they won't do it if they don't have to. Whether or not their viewership stays is another question, but honestly it's not that out there. I feel like people have already forgotten that this is how the internet worked for most of its history. Some Gen Z folks are just gonna have to learn how to use more than one app to consume all their content

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

We need an RSS-like feed of websites like this that you can watch from a centralized feed. That'd be cool.

That way you could "subscribe" to a website and have their videos aggregate on to a single video library app, just like how RSS is for content feeds. RSS does not handle video though, and I want to avoid actually going to the source website.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

theoretically they could provide an embedded video link I suppose and the centralized viewer could use that.

The trouble is that most content creators like RT aren't going to want that either, because the whole point is that they want to be able to serve ads and whatnot to pay the bills - plus they'd very much prefer people go to their site so that they continue watching RT content, instead of just watching one thing and moving on. Ultimately the "perfect" solution is going to have to strike a middle ground between what consumers want and creators need

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

That's why this solution would also require some sort of standardized advertising integration. I think every provider and content creator would want this. The standardization would of course let them choose the frequency and aggressiveness of the ads, or they just wouldn't participate altogether.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And also that people fed up with it being missing from YouTube don't just start reuploading them without permission.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

They definetely have the resources to monitor for that and report it - whether or not YouTube acts on the reports is always an open question though

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you I use Plex to consume all my content

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool? What exactly does that have to do with my comment?

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's one app

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They have apps for phone, TV, and game consoles, though.

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And, as far as I’ve always known, those apps are awful. I haven’t checked in awhile though.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

YouTube ain't much better, even if you pay for it.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Maybe they figure they'll get more revenue per-view through their website, and by removing their videos from YouTube they'll drive enough new viewers there to make up for the loss.

Let's see how that works, I guess.

[–] scala@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

To bad their website sucks.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Me and a friend were reminiscing about RvB last week and I actually had assumed they just pulled it from YouTube already, guess part of me was just living in the future.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rooster Teeth has moved some of its popular content, including most Red vs. Blue seasons, off the YouTube platform entirely and onto its own website.

Rooster Teeth senior writer and showrunner for RWBY Kerry Shawcross posted a video on Thursday announcing the change, explaining that “YouTube revenue is just not cutting it for us right now.”

Shawcross said Rooster Teeth also moved Camp Camp to the site, where episodes will continue to be ad-supported and free to watch.

He added Rooster Teeth gets “approximately 5 – 10 times more value” from ads it runs on its own website, adding that “animation’s hard and it’s expensive.”

He didn’t say specifically what was moved or when, but multiple threads on Reddit from the second half of September say that most of the Red vs. Blue series appeared to have disappeared from YouTube.


The original article contains 140 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

Neutral bot

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bring back Rage Quit. It read the only RT show I enjoyed

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

They did a rage quit compilation thing for the recent 20 year anniversary.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They should post one last video to YouTube that is just Church saying "hhhhhhhnnnnnng.... bleh"