this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
670 points (97.5% liked)

memes

9948 readers
3157 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally from XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2684/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Is it one plane flying into 5 sky scrappers?

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 15 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Why are there only 39 hamster balls? Are some people sharing?

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 2 points 2 hours ago

One of the lanes is a ball-pool lane.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes, it's the new scheme work put in for reducing hamster ball costs, ballsharing. I mean, most people run in hamster balls with more space than needed, no? Although it would more efficient if there was a bus route to carry all 50 people ngl.

edit 50 not 51

[–] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 97 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Could we please include credit for webcomics?

XKCD makes linking with attribution super easy: Permanent link to this comic: https://xkcd.com/2684/ Image URL (for hotlinking/embedding): https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/road_space_comparison.png

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Sorry about that, I found it somewhere else without credit and completely forgot the art style was from XKCD.

I'll add it to the post.

[–] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

This community is awesome.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

fun fact: it's illegal to not credit them! see the creative commons license at the bottom.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 hours ago

OP is big on digital data preservation https://xkcd.com/1683/

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Just reverse image search. Good god people need their hands held for everything.

(/s BTW)

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are you serious with your caption? The top row is the serious examples, the bottom row is the joke. XKCD is a comic strip that tells jokes occasionally.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They've probably just never seen a tandem 50 in a major city, it sounds made up.

[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Gotta swing 'er wide left then hard right for a turn on those tight city blocks.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The lower half is obviously nonsense. The future belongs to the 50 people tandem

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Humancenticycle

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

...wonder how fast a 50-seater tandem bicycle could get going, assuming ideal conditions and riders.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 hours ago

How fast can it stop? I wouldn't want to first heading against a crossing or wall with 49 people pushing the pedals behind me.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

At least 12

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 60 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Alt text: I wonder how hard it would be to ride an electric scooter in a hamster ball.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how hard it would be to stop...

[–] activ8r@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

Why would I stop?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

And how hard it would be once you stopped...

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 26 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

thats only 39 hamster balls, 0/10

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 42 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Technically he only specified how many people. Some of those hamster balls are multi passenger

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Speaking from experience?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't say there are 50 hamster balls.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In the original there are 50, 16 rows of 3 plus 2 more.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, someone edited this just to remove some hamster balls ? Weird

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

What were they hiding?

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 36 points 10 hours ago

What if these 50 people are clowns and all they have is one Fiat Uno?

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

So uh, walking, buses, and bikes for the win?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 5 hours ago

For space efficiency, yes. Bikes are actually better than walking for CO2 output. Your food has a CO2 cost, and bikes are really damn efficient at turning your food calories into forward momentum. Ebikes are even better on a per mile basis, but their higher manufacturing cost mean they never catch up to lifetime CO2 output of a regular bike. Still, whatever gets more people on bikes is a win in my book, ebike or otherwise.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Scientifically speaking yes. Also trains

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Train using road space for comparison:

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 hours ago

Unironically yes

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The hamster balls also win for style points but that's arguably walking with extra steps.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fewer steps if you get going fast enough and just ride tumbling ass over tea kettle.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The inner diameter is less than the outer diameter which makes for a small overdrive gearing ratio, translating to fewer steps even under normal operation.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

That sounds way less fun. You go ahead and calculate how many fewer steps like a nerd and I'll tumble around in one like a cool person.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't the wolves just eat everything?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

You must guard the goats from the wolves, and the cabbages from the goats. You may leave the cabbages with the wolves unattended.

[–] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 25 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because they don't like cabbages

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 16 points 9 hours ago

“My cabbages!”

  • Baahvatar, the Last Goatbender
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

so, people walking

load more comments
view more: next ›