this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
199 points (82.2% liked)

Linux

48698 readers
1326 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angel@sopuli.xyz 143 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Rustdesk looks good on the outside, but if you look inside, it has a really bad codebase and has done some sketchy stuff in the past.

Last year, it installed custom root certificates as trusted on windows, which is a huge security risk: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/discussions/6444

On linux systems, it forced its own autostart with no option to disable this behavior: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/issues/4863

In the past, when it didn’t have Wayland support yet, it edited your GDM config and just disabled wayland: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/blob/1.1.9/src/platform/linux.rs#L411-L422

Furthermore, the code quality is really bad. 90% of the linux platform-dependant code is just executing shell commands and parsing their output, while the same could be achieved in a safe way with proper rust builtins: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/blob/master/src/platform/linux.rs

While I agree that Rustdesk works pretty flawlessly, the codebase and the behavior of the developers made me distrust the software and I don’t recommend using it.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

@petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de you might want to add that warning to the post.

They also tried to submit the app to Flathub, but had way too broad permissions with no explanation why. "Users expect filesystem access" etc. In the end it was rejected and they publish a .flatpak file themselves.

https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/5233

The other points are far worse though.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Rustdesk controversy

The whole discussion on that pull request is extremely sketchy, IMO.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

To add on:

  • There is no transparency about who is behind it. It just a Github account called "Rustdesk." It could be a real company in Singapore or it could be some guy in China as people have speculated.

  • The Rustdesk software needs way more permissions than necessary. This became evident with the flatpak as they did sandbox escapes which prevented them from being on flathub

  • The Rustdesk distribution is entirely centralize release server run by Rustdesk. They could easily push out malware to lots of devices.

  • They have done some sketchy things in the past. One of the things they did was quietly switch Linux desktops back to X11.

  • The Rustdesk system is not terribly resistant to brute forcing. The weak password means they someone could try every combination.

  • Rustdesk docker deployment docker compose exposes all ports on the host. This is minor but it could lead to a sandbox excape.

  • Rustdesk servers keep getting hosted in countries that have freedom problems such as China and Russia.

[–] bluetoque@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, I'm wondering how anyone would trust this software. It literally exposes your desktop. To me that requires top-tier trust level, i.e. nothing sketchy at all.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

could be some guy in China

I don't see how that's a problem, it's not like it's by a Chinese run company or like the Chinese government is spying on you; in the case you described it'd just be a rando with a hobby/vision.

The fact that it keeps getting hosted in countries that have freedom problems, such as China and Russia, does concern me, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] highduc@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

Wow that's so sketchy.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 14 points 3 months ago

Okayyyy… thats not great. I just read one of the threads and thats scary.

The person(s?) maintaining this seems to be VERY BAD at communicating. They did fix the auto start problem but did not at all discuss this from what I see. Thats not great.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Really sad about this, because Rust Desk has been the absolute best remote access tool I've ever used in the IT world, and that includes many different professional tools like Ninja& Teamviewer.

It's so clean, easy to install and run, fast and low latency, handles multi-monitors great, runs on mobile, Linux, Windows, etc.

Such a shame that it is mired in controversy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 97 points 3 months ago (18 children)

DO NOT USE THIS

This is a massive security risk and they have had so much controversy. They also routinely delete Github issues and discussions that question them. To top it off they are likely Chinese run.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Jayb151@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Is there a good, free, cross platform alternative?

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 months ago

Tail scale and sunshine/moonlight would work

[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)
[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

Rustdesk but even more sketchy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Maybe meshcentral?

It depends on what you are trying to do. You also could do something like Tailscale + TightVNC

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] pop@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Itsfoss is blogspam and often have many mistakes and wrong info. People should really stop posting links from them.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Itsfoss is indeed written by ChatGPT I think

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't there some controversy about this that it wasn't entirely open-source?

[–] dethada@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they have a pro server with more features that’s closed source and paid

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But why do you need a server for such a program? Can't it be P2P or with the server stuff running on the client machine?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago

The server is used for hole punching, to open up a P2P connection thorugh NATs and Firewalls. If it doesn't work the server also relays the traffic between the clients.

Getting an end to end connection through todays internet is unfortunately not easy for an average user.

[–] dethada@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Theoretically, without the server, every time you want to connect to a peer you would have to figure out what's their public IP address is, which can change. The server acts as a middleman between the peers so you dont have to do this manually, all peers only need to know the server's IP address to connect to each other. The server is really only used for this initial linking up of peers, afterwards the connection is P2P (if possible, they fall back to a relay server if P2P fails).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] souperk@reddthat.com 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have setup a rustdesk server with docker, it was surprisingly easy to get started. It was for a friend who is managing the IT services of a small factory, the completely switched from TeamViewer and they are satisfied. More importantly their users, who are worse than your average windows user, found the transition relatively painless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago

I self-host my own rustdesk server and it's awesome. It just works flawlessly.

[–] gibdos@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's pretty awesome. My only gripe with it is the fact that it is super annoying when you want to send a client with your self-hosted urls to a customer.

You can either awkardly add it to the filename or you need to fork the client and build it yourself. Kind of sucks that the easier custom client function is stuck behind their subscription.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

authentication is also stuck behind their subscription. for random customers to be able to use your servers, you also have to let everyone else on the internet use it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Takahe@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does this work on a headless box?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I tried it and it's works exactly like Anydesk, except it's 5 times slower than Anydesk at least that's on their server, I know I can host it myself but I don't think I have the skill to set it up

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 7 points 3 months ago

It works very well and there is no speed difference at all. Of course you wont ever get anything worth in life without either putting in the work or paying either with money or your privacy.

[–] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I had my eye on this a few months back when I was looking for a FOSS windows Remote Desktop alternative. Between the security issues, and generally struggle to get it working well, I eventually went to a sunshine/moonlight combo for shockingly high performance screen sharing that can even handle basic gaming if need be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I always neglected it because of its name. I thought it's something for rust...

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess it's just written in Rust

[–] Rambomst@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I've been using MeshCentral lately, it does the job but the UI leaves something to be desired.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago

I was hesitant to open this post because I already know about rustdesk, but eventually I did to see the community's opinion on it. I'm so glad that I did because this is terrible!

I think more people should hear about all of this

load more comments
view more: next ›