this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
202 points (75.0% liked)

Memes

45158 readers
3223 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (16 children)

Your choice doesn't affect Gaza. That power lies with Israel and their next election.

For the rest of the world though, it will.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Unconditional political and material support for the genocide from the US is the only reason Israel is able to continue doing it. Period.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ReeSilva@bolha.forum 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What? Do u really think USA doesn't have the power to demand Israel to stop attacking?

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No. they mean, no matter who you vote, the us won't do jackshit

Edit: punctuation for better readability

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 14 points 3 weeks ago

Like saltyiceteamaker said, US won't do jackshit about what Netanyahu doing regardless on who you vote, and even if they don't give them money, highly unlikely Netanyahu will just stop doing what he's doing.

However, for other issue within US or the one affect the world, it have different impact between this two. US is one of the biggest CO2 emission country, and also the world exporter of methane, for example.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Are you aware that the only way Israel is waging their war with guns and bombs is because of the US selling them the weapons? I'm sure Israel would still want to commit genocide without them but would find it much harder to do with literal sticks and stones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

israhell has been committing this genocide for almost a century unless someone willing to abolish isntreal is on its next vallot i dont see how ir***ls next election could change anything, certainly no previous election put a stop to the genocide.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 24 points 3 weeks ago

As a Brazilian, I can unfortunately relate to the exact same scenario...

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump will turn Gaza to ruble!

Gaza:

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 3 weeks ago

Jared Kushner: Let's make the west bank into a resort

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Needs the "we care ❤️ 🌈" flag on the right side in the rubble somewhere

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

That was painted on the side of the missiles sold to the genociders.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (42 children)

Oh look, someone trying to push Trump on us. Bless your heart, you just think we're all idiots here.

No, they're not the same. None of us are buying it.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 18 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think they're pushing trump. More saying Gaza is fucked regardless.

[–] minnix@lemux.minnix.dev 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is it so common that people assume if you don't like one candidate that automatically makes you a proponent of the other? Is it not possible for you to conceive that both candidates may be power-hungry human garbage?

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

They're centrists, scared centrists, who recognize that political in-fighting can result in a split vote letting the party with less votes take the election. However in addition to being humongous pricks about it (helping the in-fighting), they fail to recognize two very obvious facts:

  1. Progressives don't have a candidate. In any party. You can't split the vote if there's no other option to split the vote with.
  2. The popular vote doesn't matter. Hasn't mattered since the Republican party stole the election in 2000 (if it ever mattered in the first place). There's somewhere between 3-6 states where the popular vote, if you trust it to be recorded and reported accurately, can swing the election one way or another. In the other 44 states, the popular vote does. Not. Matter.
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 3 weeks ago

The war machine stops for no one.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 9 points 3 weeks ago
[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

I like my politics like I like my wrestling, kayfabe

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ever wonder why these are our only two choice?

Why 3rd parties can't run without spoiling the election?

Consider watching a video on First Past the Post voting to find out why the spoilere effect exists.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why 3rd parties can’t run without spoiling the election?

They can and they are. People who don't vote third parties are voting for OPs picture; whether they think they're being smart by "playing the game" or not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/23/cornel-west-focusing-gaza-has-harsh-critiques-opponents-former-allies/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StormWalker@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

There is a lot of truth in this picture. 2 sides, both shit for humanity. It's a big problem really.. Divide and conquer tactic.. proven tactic.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Start a new party, don't believe what everyone will say about the chances for it to succeed. Talk to the people, directly.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

So what do you suggest we do about it?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago

I wish I could block keywords in images. Can't fucking escape it. And my country is owned by the ~~queen~~ king.

load more comments
view more: next ›