this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
233 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

29827 readers
443 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrinterScaked@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 month ago (5 children)

all public bodies must disclose the source code of software developed by or for them, unless precluded by third-party rights or security concerns

So this effectively changes nothing.

[–] robber@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Swiss lemming here. Switzerland already open-sourced multiple projects before, most notably the app to store your COVID test / vaccination status in. It was even officially available on F-Droid. I was very suprised at that point, and I'm happy to see that there are now efforts to make such behavior more default and less edge case, even when there are exceptions.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's the vibe in Switzerland about the upcoming quarter final against England?

[–] robber@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

A little overconfident as usual imo

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 26 points 1 month ago

Well it's a good step in the right direction, not a massive difference but still

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

I'm curious who is the arbitrator for what's a valid security concern or not. If it's done by an independent group, it might make it harder to get around. If it's self disclosed, then yeah nothing will change

[–] magguzu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if there are hardcoded credentials in places and that's enough for them to be able to say they can't lol

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Idk if that would hold up in court. This law is completely dependant on the technical competence of the judges that will use it. It can be worthless, it can be strong.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

Hey but the PR sounds good

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I quickly scanned and no mention will gov fund projects they uses. Nice.

XKCD: Dependency

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This "new law" was passed more than a year ago... But, it's still a step in the right direction.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 11 points 1 month ago