this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
20 points (91.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
785 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlakrHakr@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

I can’t read that article without being logged in but, based on your username, I’m guessing it says it’s a fuel trap?

I will say, this video from Climate Town was pretty eye opening for me on the topic of natural gas today: https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw?si=TYax0lIF3CZsPPjx

[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Paywalled, but I'm gonna go with fossil fuel trap. We need to be completely off fossil fuels by about 2050. Any new major natural gas infrastructure being built now is expected to last longer than 2050. Even new residential gas furnaces are probably expected to last around 20 years or so.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 4 months ago

Is it renewable? No?? Then you can fuck all the way off, fossil Exec's from fossil fuel companies...

[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Came here to post the exact same thing, happy to see you had it covered

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago
[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I grew up near gas hubs, where it's normal to have gas mains at home, have family employed by producers. They've been spinning this yarn as long as I can remember. It has not clean energy by any stretch, this is just the basic sales pitch for natural gas unchanged for like 30 years