this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
909 points (98.8% liked)

Star Wars Memes

11615 readers
251 users here now

Hello there. Somehow, Star Wars memes have returned. It's not a trap, this is where the fun begins.

==========

Other universes to visit:

!lotrmemes@midwest.social

!tenforward@lemmy.world

Separatist systems:

!prequelmemes@lemmy.world

Oh hey some real SW content for a change (perhaps):

!star_wars@lemmy.world

!starwars@lemmy.ml

!starwarstelevision@lemmy.world

==========

IMPORTANT

Please do not post the "good friend" or similar copypasta

==========

Our galactic citizens have requested more specific rules, so here are a few.

The general idea is, if you're looking here for rules, you're probably someone who doesn't need to have them spelled out. You're fine. But anyway:

  1. This is a community for Star Wars memes. This means typically screenshots of Star Wars media with some text or context that's meant to be funny and/or thoughtful. All SW media is welcome: movies, games, comic books, fanart... Other kinds of content, like video links or meta memes (about this community, or Lemmy), are fine as well, just keep it on topic.

  2. We are all friends here, and love (sometimes love to hate) Star Wars. Be nice to each other.

  3. As fans of fictional media, we can be passionate. If you very strongly disagree with something or someone, take a deep breath before reacting. Anger leads to the dark side!

  4. Everything in Star Wars has happened a long time ago, in a galaxy far away, and it's a rich universe of millions of words and millions of years of history. So current Earthly matters really shouldn't concern us here. In other words, leave politics, philosophies and convictions behind the door. This applies even if it's about something related to Star Wars.

  5. Original content is preferred. Reposts are fine, just please limit to a maximum of 3 per day, per citizen. It is recommended, but not required, to mark original memes as (OC) and reposts as (repost).

  6. Local mods are the Jedi council. They may take actions that are necessary to maintain peace and stability of the Republic, even beyond the rules outlined here. Follow their guidance.

  7. Regular rules of the Lemmy.world instance apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 171 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

A valid criticism. Coming from the mouth of something trying to replace it with something worse. A classic villain move.

I did enjoy the old EU Luke being a more reformist and grounded iteration of Jedi teachings. He started by rejecting Yoda’s warnings not to try and save his friends. He put friends over the high minded ideals of Jedi enlightenment right there in Empire Strikes Back. Then in ROTJ he spent the entire movie rejecting the obvious approach of simply killing Vader, instead trying to reach Anakin. Over and over Luke put people he cared about over esoteric codes.

(Remember when the original trilogy and much of the EU establishing Luke was written, the prequels and Clone Wars hadn’t been fleshed out, and Jedi were implied to be even more high minded and classical than they were shown in the prequels).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 55 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm convinced that Count Dooku was a character quickly shoehorned in as a villain when the filmmakers got pushback from execs for having Jar Jar Binks as the actual Sith Lord (with Palpatine merely being the Apprentice).

It all makes sense (r*ddit)

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What execs? The Prequels are basically the highest budget indie film project ever. Lucas had total financial and creative control.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Leg@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I did a rewatch of the prequels just to show a friend all the Darth Jar Jar evidence that never comes to fruition. We were robbed of a better experience.

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Man, I really wish that all went somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 52 points 5 months ago (3 children)

To me, the scene that most defined what the Jedi order had become and why it needed to end was at the big fight scene at the end of Attack of the Clones where Yoda and Dooku were dueling. When Dooku pulled a pillar down with the Force and then Yoda used the Force to catch it to prevent it from falling on to Obi-wan. He then made a spectacle of it by spinning it around before throwing it back at Dooku. What he should have done was just use the Force to move Obi-wan and Anakin to a safe position and continued to pursue Dooku. That scene just demonstrated how full of himself Yoda had become. And it took until his duel with Palpatine before he realized that he was a large part of what had gone wrong with the Jedi order. I also always felt that he intentionally withheld a lot of information about the Jedi order from Luke in order to prevent him from rebuilding a similar system.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have a really hard time separating a character's decisions and the director/cinematographer decisions

Like, did Yoda do that or did someone decide he would do that because test audiences thought it looked cooler (or something like that). I hope I conveyed that properly

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I think you conveyed it excellently - not solely because it was the exact thought I had. I would have used more clumsy wording though.

[–] Thavron@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Aren't the director's decisions basically the same as the character's? I mean, they're fictional so the only insight into their character is what we're shown by the media (i.e. the director's choices).

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's one thing to think "Yoda was full of himself" and another to think "director wanted a cool looking fight". They're basically saying you shouldn't analyze the thing too much because there wasn't THAT much thought put into it. Not every move had the character's thoughts and feelings taken into consideration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

High acceleration has... undesirable effects, let's say, on a sack of meat and bones. "Space magic", sure, but I'd argue that in a high-stress situation like the middle of a fight it'd be a lot less risky to move the pillar. If you fuck up calculating how much force (lol) to use, you might end up with Obi-Was instead.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't remember the scene exactly. But it might be that the pillar was falling fast enough that he couldn't move them (or it would be risky). Moving the pillar was way safer.

[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 5 months ago

Regardless, he takes it and starts spinning it around before throwing it which was entirely unnecessary and only for show. He could've just as easily deflected it to a safer location.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

“You know what would be really interesting to do? Don’t denounce me as a Stalinist but, for example – it’s my old temptation – to rewrote Star Wars… presenting Palpatine and Darth Vader as good progressive egalitarian centralist fighting reactionary feudalist, all the Jedi bullshit. It would tell a completely different story, from the others point. What do they [Jedi] stand for? All that, ‘Republic’, what strange of Republic is when you have a Princess Leila, knights, kings and so on? No, Palpatine the Emperor and Darth Vader, they are - my god - progressive Bonapartist revolutionaries trying to get rid of the old world.”

From: Žižek on Reshooting Star Wars https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_DroaGggbc

But tbh I think that if we take the original trilogy, the Rebels are cleary fighting a reactionary imperialist power, ie. an analogy to the Vietnam war

[–] promitheas@programming.dev 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As ive grown older i find myself disagreeing more and more with the jedi whom as a child i idolised as paragons of good. But palpatine, vader, and the empire are so many things before being "poor good revolutionaries" trying to take down the status quo simply from the good of their golden hearts. Theres always more than 2 choices people :)

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 5 months ago

Andor did a good job of not giving a shit about the Jedi and also showing how terrible the fascist empire was. The whole prison episodes were really amazing.

Tap for spoilerAnd all those prisoners for some hinges in the Death Star cannon.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

But tbh I think that if we take the original trilogy, the Rebels are cleary fighting a reactionary imperialist power, ie. an analogy to the Vietnam war

Lucas was very explicit that this was always the intent. It's not reallt subtle honestly, asymmetric jungle freedom fighters fighting wealthy imperialist?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Sith and the Empire didn't help anyone either though, they made existence considerably worse for everyone other than a select few. They weren't saviours or good guys, they were evil despots who sought to use lies to overthrow the existing power structure so they could fill the void with their totalitarianism.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

What this meme is pointing out though is that they didn't just use lies to overthrow the existing power structure, they also used truths.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Any complex truth can be twisted when it is overly simplified and points are selectively chosen to support the bigger lie.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 5 months ago

Yeah the Sith here are the type of fascist regime to rise to power on the backs of a frustrated population. Pointing out all the flaws of the current system to garner support with no intention of actually making it better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is why Dooku made a shitty Sith. His underlying reasons were just, but didn't stop to think about who he was hooking up with. He's ultimately a tragic figure of someone who meant well and fucked it up.

Sith ethos doesn't work like that. It's a self-centered philosophy; you gain power for the sake of doing what you please. Palatine was never going to have Dooku as an apprentice long term.

Anakin's reasons were selfish. His relationship with Padme was always toxic, immature, and selfish. Him wanting to save her was fundamentally selfish. It wasn't for her sake as a person apart from Anakin. That's exactly the kind of behavior the Sith philosophy encourages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Council needed age limits and term limits.

[–] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yoda's husband Paul was investigated for insider trading because of some extremely well timed trades just prior to battles with the empire.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago

Damn that's some crooked lore.

[–] _NetNomad@kbin.run 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Tales of the Jedi did a really good job fleshing Dooku out. many star wars villains are unambigiously evil- that's what happens when dark wizardry is very real and a viable career path i guess- but Dooku really thought he was doing the right thing at first, like a more selfless Anakin. a lot of Star Wars media does a great job illustrating that the Republic and the Jedi were deeply flawed, but don't make the jump to saying that many if not most planets joined the CIS in good faith for that reason- i guess because the new non-droids we see in the CIS are all asshats or aforementioned evil wizards, but still! the fight against the republic and the rebellion against the empire were essentially the same conflict from a certain point of view...

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

This is a big reason why I personally like episodes 1-3 more than 4-6. It's just more interesting because neither side is 100% good or 100% bad, and there's a couple times where you're like "wait, the bad guy actually has a point", or "are the good guys really doing the right thing here?". That sort of conflict makes for much better storytelling and more interesting characters, especially when compared to the run-of-the-mill hero's journey story and characters in 4-6.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Putting the right guy in power never worked historically since power corrupts. The power structure is the problem. That's one of the core ideas of anarchism

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it has worked historically, just extremely rarely. Singapore was one such recent example.

The issue is that people die and the next person usually fucks everything up again.

Anarchy has similar issues.

The real problem is just us; humans.

[–] lugal@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That's the next core idea: power structures attract the wrong people. Take Stalin who was worse than Lenin. Lenin had benevolent ideas but got corrupted, Stalin took that position with bad intentions from the start.

Fatalism only serves the status quo.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

Too bad the person he's talking to is far more corrupt than Yoda.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 20 points 5 months ago

I read the text before even looking at the bottom picture and then realized I was making literally the exact same face lol perfect

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

One set of assholes talking trash about another set of assholes. Neither completely evil or completely good.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I never noticed but, is he pouring wine over ice?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I thought the old lore said light/dark had to be in balance, or bad shit starts going down

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Lucas had an uninituative meaning of “balance”. It wasn’t light and dark being equal, but dark side users being eliminated.

A better word would have been “tranquility”. If the force is naturally a calm lake, then dark side users are making waves I suppose is a clearer analogy.

[–] roflo1@feddit.nl 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nono... There was no mistake there.

Before the Clone Wars, there were lots of Jedi everywhere in the Galaxy, and only a couple of Sith.

Anakin did bring balance.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Nope, Lucas meant the dark side being wiped out.

Lucas’ intention was that Anakin brought balance, eventually, by killing Palpatine and then himself rejecting the dark side. Thus wiping out the Sith.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

George can let us take it from here. He's done enough damage.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

But then Disney said "hey! We'd rather make an endless river of money!" and pulled a new empire and sith lord out of thin air to make another movie.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›