this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
184 points (95.5% liked)

News

22838 readers
3699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Megan Black said her husband's trip to Russia was "ill-advised" but simply part of an extramarital affair. Black's mother said she thought he had been set up by his girlfriend.

The wife of Gordon Black, the American soldier detained on theft charges in Russia, said he traveled there because he was having an affair and was not involved in "geopolitical intrigue."

Megan Black is in the process of divorcing her husband and called on Russian authorities through a statement from her attorney, Brett Pritchard, to release him to provide comfort to their 6-year-old daughter.

She said she had no knowledge of his trip to Vladivostok in eastern Russia until an Army investigation branch official contacted her asking for information on what was at first a missing person inquiry, and only learned about the details of the trip after NBC News broke the story of his detention Monday.

"Nevertheless, Megan Black firmly believes that Mr. Black's decision to travel to Russia, while ill-advised, was motivated by entirely personal reasons involving an extra-marital affair," her lawyer said in the statement Thursday.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Is there a Wikipedia list of international incidents caused by inability to keep it in your pants? If not, there should be.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TIL. Looks like a good read. Thanks!

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

LMAO before reading the article i thought it was because french was less horny idk, but no, it's the complete opposite

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

French wife: oh perfect, can he keep bustin in you for a couple more days? I got a young roofer coming over to lay some brick.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

It also did not work on Indonesian president.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 42 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

That's because humans like to fuck.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

broad topic

I see what you did there.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 4 months ago

lol, right?

Check the history section

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 34 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You gotta hand it to her. She has the opportunity to help throw him under a bus, and she was the bigger person.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, she said 'comfort' and sure, but it's also support, as in child support

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm not 100% but I'm pretty sure the army will make sure the kid is taken care of regardless. They don't allow deadbeat dads.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They don't even take care of veterans properly, I doubt they'll take care of the kid.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well he's still technically in the army so he should get paid, and seeing as he's indisposed at the moment, no reason why it shouldn't go to her. Unless he took her off his beneficiary list, though I doubt he did.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

https://www.moore.army.mil/mcoe/sja/content/pdf/AR%20608-99%20Family%20Support.pdf

I think child support is already being paid as soon as she said she is going to divorce him. It doesn't require him to agree. The military will just garnish his wages.

I think he may be technically AWOL, which probably complicates things... Not sure how that would work.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol what are you talking about?

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They will garnish your wages. As a service member you don't have the same rights in court. If parentage is established, the military just starts sending a chunk of your paycheck to the custodial parent.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean Jack to a lot of deadbeats. Hence the name "deadbeat"

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Do you know what it is to garnish wages? They just cut a check to the custodial parent. The would be deadbeat grunt just doesn't get his money to make payments on a jixer or Camero or whatever.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Also thinking about her daughter's well-being in all this - all in all not your average kind of person.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 months ago

"Send him back so I can kill him myself"?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 4 months ago

Yeah, well we've all been there. Who among us can resist the international femme fatale of a hostile nation state?

[–] shani66@ani.social 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That seems like an even dumber reason to waltz into Russia.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps none of the women in any other nationality were interested in him.

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Aw. And neither was this "woman", who it seems was just Russian ops trying to lure another dumb American hostage.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not all the Russian honeypot and money in the world could convince me to step foot in that shithole of a nation.

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Seems worth noting he's not being charged with anything spying or geopolitics related, but instead he's been charged with theft. No details in the article about what he's accused of having stolen. Seems like almost the only notable fact in this whole story is his being a US soldier in Russia, otherwise there's a ton of Americans accused of pretty crimes while abroad every day.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suspect it's about to become another american-held-hostage thing; like with Greiner.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hope they don't exchange a high profile arms dealer for this one.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

do we have another high profile arms dealer?

I hope we don't trade one either. Or something as bad.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If he actually committed theft in Russia then that's hilarious. But this could easily be Russia playing it low key until they need a US spy headline for domestic consumption.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

That is why most people go to Russia