this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
198 points (90.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35694 readers
1021 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Used a couple of US recipes recently and most of the ingredients are in cups, or spoons, not by weight. This is a nightmare to convert. Do Americans not own scales or something? What's the reason for measuring everything by volume?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 73 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Apparently the French sent over a metric system for the Americans to use, but the ship was lost.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/28/574044232/how-pirates-of-the-caribbean-hijacked-americas-metric-system

I've seen numerous sources for this.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

OP is asking about volume vs weight, not metric volume vs imperial volume.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago (13 children)

If the US had adopted the metric system it wouldn't matter.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

Watch some cooking shows on YouTube where they cook from two hundred year old cookbooks. Weighing stuff is a modern thing. All the “ye olde recipes” from Europe and the colonies were done in cups, spoons, and some other volume measurements we don’t use anymore like “jills”. (If they even bother to specify meaurements.)

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

"the" and "ye" are amusingly redundant next to each other.

I was positively intrigued the day I learned "ye olde shoppe" is pronounced exactly the same way as "the old shop".

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

"A handful of this, a sprig of that, a penny weight of some other stuff"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

The imperial system is a nightmare. A lot of us hate it and agree that metric is far easier. I grew up with the imperial system and still don't know the conversions between quarts, pints, ounces, and cups. Blame the French and British, we got it from them!

I'm currently calorie counting in order to lose weight and I weigh everything in grams because it's easier.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This isn't about imperial vs metric, it's about measuring by mass vs volume. A good example here is flour. Weighing out 30 grams (or about 1 ounce) of flour will always result in the same amount. On the other hand, you can densely pack flour into a 1/4 cup measuring cup, you can gingerly spoon it in little by little, or you can scoop and level. When you do this you'll get three different amounts of flour, even though they all fill that 1/4 cup. Good luck consistently measuring from scoop to scoop even if you use the same method for each scoop.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you. When we measure flour on the moon, it's the same as on earth. You just don't understand our advance measurement technique with your primitive weighing.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Joke aside, scales on earth measure force and show mass on the assumption of the gravitational pull on earth. On a moon colony, you'd use measuring scales with a different value for the gravitational pull, and get the same values for mass as on earth.

Edit: Also, if anyone finds this stuff interesting to think about. You can measure mass without any force of gravity, but having the measuring device accelerate (e.g. shake) the stuff you want to measure. From "F=ma", knowing F and a, you get m.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Blame the French and British, we got it from them!

Like 99% of the world, the French and British long ago managed to overcome the imperial system. Actually, the French spearheaded the metric world.

America just failed, time and again, to follow the times.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (21 children)

I am converting my life to metric, actually. All of my CAD work is in metric and all of my chemistry glass is thankfully in metric. Thinking in longer distances is something I need to get used to though.

The imperial system is just a waste of time, TBH. I am sure there are a ton of people that can work fractions in their head but I just gotta ask: Why, and what is the point?

Measuring and planning with metric is just so damn easy and no extra steps are generally needed. When I need to convert 1000mm I just move the decimal over a bit and get 1km. EZ.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 26 points 6 months ago (5 children)

When I need to convert 1000mm I just move the decimal over a bit and get 1km. EZ.

🤔

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 41 points 6 months ago

"Do Americans not own scales or something?"

For a good long while, no they didn't. For a large fraction of American history a typical home kitchen had no bespoke measuring equipment at all; but tea cups, tea spoons and table spoons were typically available and made to pretty similar sizes, plus if you always used the same ones the proportions would be roughly the same, so meh.

A lot of traditional recipes were written this way, and it has remained so by tradition. A system of inexpensive, easy to manufacture measuring cups and spoons became standard equipment by the mid-20th century, and hasn't changed to this day because it works just fine.

The US government is in the habit of publishing recipes with a deliberately low minimum equipment list. The United States Department of Agriculture for example conducts extensive testing on home canning recipes and methods, and deliberately writes their recipes to be used in poorly equipped kitchens, because the kind of folks who rely on putting up home grown vegetables for the winter don't tend to spend a lot of money on Sharper Image kitchen gadgetry. Flipping through my copy of the Ball Complete Book of Home Preserving, I find about a third of recipes could be made using nothing but a mason jar or two as your only measuring tool, as most mason jars (excluding the deliberately decorative ones) have graduation marks in cups, ounces and milliliters molded into them.

[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Most Americans I know don’t even have a scale in their kitchen!

I (an American) always wonder what a cup of spinach is. Like I can really pack it into a cup or not and there is a huge difference.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (40 children)

Because it's quicker to just use a measuring cup than by weighing it out every time, I assume.

I do have a scale, but I mostly use it when portioning out a big chub of ground turkey or beef.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Volumetric measurements, like the imperial system, is largely in place due to tradition.

But no, most people do not own good food scales. They aren't pricey (I think mine was $25), but they are very uncommon. I don't think I've ever seen one in a store.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] esc27@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Cups, teaspoons, and tablespoons in this context are standardized units of measure. It is very common to find at least one set of measuring cups and spoons in a US kitchen. Scales are uncommon.

I use both. For flour, scales are far, far superior. For sugar, it does not really seem to matter. For small amounts, I suspect my tea/tablespoons might be more accurate than my scale...

Not that accuracy matters that much in a recipe using eggs. Chickens aren't necessarily known for precision...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 22 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Do Americans not own scales or something?

I do not own a kitchen scale. Outside of baking, volume works well enough.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Paraneoptera@sopuli.xyz 21 points 6 months ago

I think it goes back to Fannie Farmer in 1896, who wrote the first major and comprehensive cookbook in English that used any kind of standard measurements. European cookbooks mostly used vague instructions without any standardized weights or numbers before that. At this point in the industrialized world standardized cup measures were relatively cheap and available. Scales were relatively bulky, expensive, and inaccurate in 1896. So the whole tradition got started, and most of the major cookbooks owed something to Fannie Farmer. Cookbooks that used standardized weights probably got started in other countries much later, when scales were becoming commonplace.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 20 points 6 months ago

I'm not American but this is likely due to tradition. Recipe measures it in cups, you follow recipe, you get used to cups, then when writing your own recipe down you do it by cups.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (20 children)

As an American who has recently learned to love his scale, I'm with you 100%. With that being said, no, many Americans do not have kitchen scales.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Shutout to the one dude who downvoted literally every comment lol I hope you enjoyed it

[–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

American here but I do a lot of baking, I do own a scale and prefer to weigh ingredients because I'm amazed at the different quantities of flour I can get from cup to cup depending how packed the flour is or how I scoop it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I'm with you but I get it that sometimes it's convenient. My wife likes what we call "cup recipes" in baking where everything is measured in cups/glasses (this was a new thing couple of years ago where I live). It's very fast and convenient.

But yes, it gets out of hand. I mean "a cup of celery"? ... How? Why?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm always confused by their insistence to use fluid ounces.

An ounce is fine it's a measurement of mass. But how can you measure liquids by mass, when really what you mean is displacement, its like saying fluid kilograms, it's not a thing, it makes no sense.

I know Americans probably know what it means but everybody else doesn't have a clue. If you have 250 fluid oz of something is that like a bucket or a single droplet? Or is it a small booting lake, I have no idea at all.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fl. Oz are actually nothing to do with weight. They are volume.

For each fluid oz. use 30 ml

It's only approximate but the official measurements for nutrition actually do it in the US so it's not a real unit anyway anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

The metric system uses a similar principle. 1 liter is a kg of water. It's just named better.

[–] tcrpz@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

So many in the comments are talking about volume being more convenient but I find it so much more convenient to put a bowl on a scale, tare it, measure, and set it aside. Sure that’s more steps than using a cup, but when I have to fumble with a cup, a 1/3rd cup, a teaspoon, a 1/2 teaspoon and a tablespoon, all for a single recipe, especially one where dry and wet ingredients are being measured, a pain in the ass. So many little dishes that I may or may not need to rinse and dry between ingredients that call for the same measurement.

For the record I’m an American. I will sometimes ditch a recipe when I see it calls for volumetric measurements.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Go back 100, 200 years.

Hell, go back 40 years. Scales were less available, and before digital scales, much slower, take up space, and cost much more than cups and spoons, which you would still need.

100 years ago, even a poor person with little space could have a full set of measuring cups/spoons.

Cups and spoons are sufficiently accurate for anything other than baking. Even with baking, many simpler recipes it's still OK. My mother and grandmother baked many things using cups and spoons.

I still use cups and spoons for anything other than baking - they're sufficiently accurate. Why pull out a scale for things like 1/8 tsp ground pepper? Is that even a gram?

King Arthur, the flour company that's been around over 220 years, publishes numerous recipes that were originally in cups and spoons (because those were the tools 200 years ago), and those recipes are still in cups and spoons. Their muffin recipe is delicious.

English muffins originated in the late 1800s, using volumetric measures - they're still around, still delicious. I've made them, using volumetric measures.

Ever weighed 8oz of water?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It really depends what sort of recipes you're making, but for cooking very loose approximations are often fine.

I often have to convert to weight/mass in order to find out how much of an ingredient to buy. I have no idea how many cups an eggplant is. But once I get it home the recipe might as well say "however much eggplant you have."

If I'm truly off, I will typically scale up the recipe adjusting for the extra meat or vegetable content. I'll more or less assume that 1lb of meat is interchangeable with 1lb of veggies. That's not quite true, in particular with salt.

Your mileage may vary though. Some recipes and ingredients are much more sensitive to deviations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because it's often easier to measure things by volume, and most cooking dishes do not need precise measurements. It sucks for baking dishes, but for anything that doesn't need to be precise I find it way more convenient to grab a volume measurement than a scale

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

the truth is americans kind of just do things arbitrarily.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Eh, it's what I grew up with...

3 teaspoons = 1 tablespoon (14.787ml)
1 tablespoon = .5 ounces
8 ounces = 1 cup (236.588ml)
1 cup = .5 pints
1 pint = .5 quarts (473.176ml)
1 quart = .25 gallons

The weird thing is, above 20 ounces, sodas are sold in metric. 1L, 2L, 3L. So is alcohol, 750ml.

Milk and juice are sold in ounces, pints, quarts and gallons.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (4 children)

History.

Why do Brits use Stone for weight of people? Same answer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›