541
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 200 points 9 months ago
[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 178 points 9 months ago

No.

No, no, no, no, no!

Is she looking at Feinstein and thinking “well, I don’t need to be propped up yet, so I should still be able to run the country!”

I don’t care on which side of the aisle these oldies sit. They do not represent the will of a people who are largely younger than they are by two decades.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 38 points 9 months ago

No, she's looking at her and her husband's bank accounts and thinking "well, I don't need to be propped up yet, so I can continue to be grossly corrupt and get even richer"

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Well, she is the queen of congressional insider trading…

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

She was # 6 in 2021, # 1 to 5 were all Republicans.

Then things didn't go as well in 2022

So how about we start paying attention to Republican tradings? 👍

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 120 points 9 months ago

Hi, dem here. WE DONT WANT FUCKING ELDRITCH GODS REPRESENTING US anymore. Term limits. Term limits. Term limits.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 47 points 9 months ago

Term limits and age limits.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 101 points 9 months ago

She is widely credited with marshalling the passage of former President Barack Obama's signature healthcare legislation, as well as bills to address infrastructure and climate change under incumbent President Joe Biden.

Her big claim to fame...

Getting republicans to vote for a more conservative healthcare plan than what the Republican candidate for president wanted to pass if he had won.

It's fucking disgusting moderates still act like that was the finish line over a decade later and oppose any more improvement to it, while demanding we call them progressive for it.

Although, once you're in your 70s, a decade probably feels like two weeks. Time flies when age related mental decline stops you from noticing the passage of time.

[-] CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works 33 points 9 months ago

Hey, they had to get rid of the public option part and gut the bill to get some republican support! Ignore the fact that it was still passed entirely from a down party lines vote with zero republican support. They had to make it a shitty gutted bill for some reason. It was such an accomplishment forcing everyone to get healthcare from multi billion dollar companies with fat profit margins.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MossBear@lemmy.world 90 points 9 months ago

I respect older people, but at this age you really have no business being in high levels of government. Go retire and enjoy your life. If you want to, be an advisor to more junior members of congress. This wraithing is absurd.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 80 points 9 months ago

I'm in her district. This has given me a possibly-crazy idea. What if I registered to run against her? Hear me out.

I don't think that I could win. She's been in the game for so long, I have no illusions. But, registering and announcing a campaign to challenge her might result in some national publication contacting me for a quote. I might be able to get a line in said publication and get people talking about it.

"Nancy Pelosi should get out of the way of younger generations and let those who came after her have a seat at the table."

I'd appreciate feedback on the value of doing something like this. Also, the likelihood that it would have the desired outcome. Also, thoughts on how this might be done.

I've been kicking this idea around since this morning when I first saw this. I'm increasingly thinking that it sounds like a good idea. Thoughts?

[-] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

I think the local DNC would have to "allow" it. Otherwise you'd run as something-other-than-Democratic.

But all it would cost you is time, and maybe a small filling fee to find out.

I say, go for it! It would at least shake up the geriatric incumbents a bit.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

The local DNC could potentially work against you but they can't stop you from running in the primary as long as you meet the requirements.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] stephfinitely@artemis.camp 66 points 9 months ago

We need to put an age limit on political offices

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think we should also include term limits for these offices in addition to the age limit.

You can’t be president for more than 8 years, but you can be in the same political office more or less for almost 40? That doesn’t make a lot of sense to me lol.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago

Can we not be ruled by geriatrics anymore?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vamp07@lemm.ee 55 points 9 months ago

I’m angry at her, but more angry at the voters that reelect her. Get new blood into these positions.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

Two party system that the party gets to choose who runs.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

While that does suck, there are options in the primary. So you can vote her out without voting for a Republican, if that's anathema/unrealistic in her district.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

Fuck this horrible bitch. She fucking enriches herself via a marriage of her position and decision making with the stock market.

Fucking disgusting, no fucking politician that votes on policy should be allowed to trade stocks.

GET THE FUCK OUT AND STAY OUT YOU GERIATRIC FUCKING CORRUPT TRAITOR

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

The fucked up thing is that people are still gonna vote for her. No one cares about corruption or acrually having good political leaders, they just need their team to win like it's some kind of stupid sport.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 37 points 9 months ago

Stocks aren't going to inside trade themselves! Get out of the way you old cunt. Hopefully someone primaries her and the people in SF vote her out. Still worse to have a Republican in the seat but jfc this is infuriating.

[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There really needs to be age limits on government positions.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] danhab99@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago
[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

She's not the worst, but as I was reading, I thought she was dead until I made it to "seeks re-election"...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

another canidate question what has your past politics done for me locally? even nationally? if the answer is unsure or maybe some tv propaganda answer that was fed to you then why do they deserve votes

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] malloc@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Whatever happened to “just fuck off to your third home in the Hamptons and become a philanthropist” retirement path for these people?

She and her family rich af. Just pass the torch and support some other upstart. Fucking power hungry assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flashoflight@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

We need to shut down this senior center. I'm tired of this. Let's get some fresh ideas in this place.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

muther fucker, get these old farts outta here.

[-] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

HEY REPUBLICANS:

I'm as left leaning as they come and this old bitch should retire. This is one of the many many many differences between us. All you care about is winning, like this is some type of fucking football game, and I care about is what's best for our country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Ugh get these dinosaurs out of office. I do not feel represented by someone who is a millionaire and over twice my age, they have no understanding of what my life is like or what I need.

[-] dethb0y@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

We seriously need age limits for elected officials, it's absolutely absurd to have an octogenarian in a position of authority like that.

While we're at it, term limits for congress would be nice - 19 terms is absolutely ridiculous.

[-] generalterrestrial@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Didn't Ruth teach these geriatric roadblocks anything?!?

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

maybe US voters who should take more than colors and letters into consideration such as job resume over the years, what are they financially invested in, past examples of experience, et cetera

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

No.

Boomers, agnostic of any party affiliation, have brain worms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 9 months ago

Someone fucking primary her ass

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Holy crap when I saw the headline at first I thought it was an obit

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
541 points (94.6% liked)

News

21706 readers
4388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS