this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
118 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

7082 readers
364 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To busy funding a genocide to help stop one...

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

The one thing I'll give them is their priorities have always always been consistent...

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Asked whether Canada would increase spending in the forthcoming April 16 federal budget, Freeland declined to give an answer either way.

Gee, I sure hope we do. I don't really want to be dependent on the US any more than we have to in this increasingly dangerous world. We actually cut funding the last time around. Her dodging the question doesn't inspire confidence although I guess it's pretty secret what's going to be in there.

[–] Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

As a canadian id be happy if we met the 2% gdp target, as an engineer i see it as public spending to help boost our high tech industries and prevent skilled workers from packing up and leaving.

But the government needs to carve out an agreement as a part of NORAD where canadian companies can sell defence products to the US without being american owned and 51% american operated.. otherwise were just paying money to lose industries and the biggest purchases most of our governments will ever make just go to building industries and jobs in other countries. Imo thats why we currently dont hit the spending target, wheres the economic benefit in an age of economic problems?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland says Canada's commitment to Ukraine has been an important contribution to NATO's strength at a time when the United States has been "unable to step up" on aid to the embattled country.

Freeland was responding to a question about Canada's efforts to meet NATO's military spending target for member nations — two per cent of GDP — in an interview airing Saturday on CBC's The House.

She told host Catherine Cullen that Canada's per capita commitments to Ukraine — which she called "NATO's most pressing challenge" — had been very significant.

"Canadians can stand up tall and proud, knowing that our country is absolutely doing our part to resist Russia [and] support Ukraine, which is NATO's biggest fight," she said.

Freeland said "shenanigans in Congress" have left the U.S. unable to provide much-needed support to Ukraine as it fights to defend itself from Russian forces.

And I've been equally clear that I don't think it's fair to assess Canada's performance or commitment to defence by reference to any single metric," he said.


The original article contains 644 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!