this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
325 points (94.8% liked)

Socialism

4962 readers
26 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IHATESMOKINGCHRONIC@hexbear.net 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Capitalism is a mode of production that formed by consuming other modes of production (regions which generally had more capital and usury control where they were highly developed for the time period) in the areas which constituted the main population centers and developments of civilization throughout history up until one millenia ago. West Asia, India, and China. Since then Europeans have engaged in a campaign of suffering so massive it threatens to extinguish not only ways of life but forms of life, entire damn categories of lifeforms.

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can I get a translation on this

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I see that mindset in mega-corps, but at the smallest of scales... one can wash a car or fix a bike and add value to (and thus grow) the system, which logically means it's not closed/finite.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You just showed the system of value goes beyond making new products... But it is still finite, there will be only so many cars to wash (or more accurately, people willing to pay to get their car washed) or bikes that can be fixed.

It can be a big systems but it is finite

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm sorry, it's difficult for me to follow your logic, but I really appreciate your time in responding. I know at one time there were zero bikes, now there are more than zero, and I suspect more will be created... same with money, so I don't understand how that is finite.

For discussion, perhaps it would be easier to reduce the complexity. In a capitalist system, if I own a fruit tree in an ideal climate then not only can it be duplicated, but either it will produce value by itself, or I will by picking its fruit. AFAICS this added fruit is more value, and the system has grown. Further I can then use this fruit to trade for bike repair or car washings. Is that not right?

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

There are only two ways of producing "value". You either extract resources from the planet or you use labor to enhance those resources. The value is in the problems solved by the finished product.

Capitalism requires that capital is invested in the manner which produces the most profit. Thus infinite growth.

There is not an infinite amount of resources or labor. The fruit tree extracts nutrients from the soil and requires water to be added.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

I know at one time there were zero bikes, now there are more than zero, and I suspect more will be created...

Correct but, there cannot always be more bikes... At some point there may not be demand for more, or materials run out or become too expensive... Taken to the extreme, you cannot produce more bikes forever

For discussion, perhaps it would be easier to reduce the complexity. In a capitalist system, if I own a fruit tree in an ideal climate then not only can it be duplicated, but either it will produce value by itself, or I will by picking its fruit.

Again, globally we may produce x billion tons of fruit this year.... Maybe a few million more next year... Can we always produce more fruit (more as in a greater number than last year) forever?

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Think longer term. Let’s go with that Fruit analogy. If you have a fruit tree in ideal conditions and begin growing more, eventually you will hit conditions that are not ideal. You can make them more ideal, you can buy more land that is ideal with the fruit proceeds. But eventually you will run out of land where it is possible to grow fruit trees. The supply is now limited. But before that, you will hit a point where people no longer demand the fruit, and your fruit is not worth the upkeep of your orchards.

So you increase the price to try and reach parity before you farm all the land, and you keep a store back for droughts and other problem periods. (Companies like DeBeers store back diamonds to hit this point artificially without risking a drop in demand)

Now imagine every person is trying to grow as many fruit trees as possible. That land runs out a lot faster and the saturation point is reached faster. The point where it makes sense to grow more trees is hit a lot sooner.

Advertising is another form of artificially raising demand. If you think you are hitting an equilibrium you have to start trying to convince people that your product is special and better than the other guy’s product.

Ultimately, the system is finite because land is finite, demand is finite, and people are finite. You can’t expect eternal growth in a finite system.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Capitalism is not based on the notion that you can enjoy limitless growth in a closed, finite system.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago (49 children)

It is the way we do it! :-P

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago
[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's also not a closed, finite system because it relies on the extraction of resources and labor from outside of the imperial core.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

sadly the earth is a finite system except for inputting radiation and outputting entropy

[–] rah@feddit.uk 10 points 3 months ago

outside of the imperial core

The closed system refers to planet Earth.

[–] smb@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

what's that? is it an airplane? is it a rocket? no, it's Captain Obvious !!

[–] stanka@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Here I thought it was based on the fact that humans are the worst and it is best to harness what little you can lest they take everything.

load more comments
view more: next ›