this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
506 points (98.5% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

3 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 123 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

And another site is enveloped by shitifacation.

Edit: ENshittifacation. Apparently, shitifacation is where an airline loses all of your luggage, lol

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Remember IMDB in the early 00s? It was all you needed from what it set out to be. I recently went back to grab some lists for automation and holy shit it’s a wasteland of bullshit. I can’t imagine getting lost in it for hours learning about movies and deciding what I wanted to watch next if it was what it has become

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really loved IMDb back in the day. While the user ratings weren't perfect, there used to be a formula you could use to figure out the worthiness of a movie to watch. Now (10 years or so), IMDb user ratings are inundated with conservatives and older generations who tend to rate based on their fragile feelings rather than on how watchable a movie is.

[–] TrenchcoatFullofBats@belfry.rip 26 points 1 year ago

conservatives and older generations who tend to rate based on their fragile feelings

"Woke" doesn't mean what you think it means, JesusLittleKidLover88, and it certainly doesn't apply to Crank 2.

[–] AZERTY@feddit.nl 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Don't forget the anime weirdos voting against incredibly popular shows so their anime can be the best one. Once Breaking Bad was knocked out of the top spots by Attack on Titan and Fullmetal Alchemist weebs I stopped caring about the ratings.

load more comments (6 replies)

I miss the IMDb message boards so much. It was so neat to be able to ask a question about a movie or read a post someone made three years before explaining the ending.

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Letterboxd has been slowly filling that void for me

[–] nevernevermore@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

shitifacation

The term is enshittification, penned by Cory Doctorow

Shitifacation was my last international holiday where the airline lost my luggage

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Oof. THAT must have royally sucked

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 88 points 1 year ago (5 children)

IGN making this article is wild. I'm not accusing them of accepting literal money but come on lmao.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

IGN: “Fifty dollars?! Have some fucking dignity. Our good reviews cost at least $200k”

[–] tea@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago

It takes a thief to catch a thief

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah didn't they give the latest Battlefield 9/10 on release? 😂

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was thinking the same lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Rotten tomatoes had nothing to do with this. They don’t even employ critics. They aggregate them and the PR firm was directly contacting reviewers.

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you think RT hasn't been in active incentive based collusion with studios and critic for years, you're the type of purposefully ignorant that advertisers make their bread and butter off of. RT was been corrupt since they sold out, and that was a very very very long time ago now.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Didn't they actively and very publicly suppresse reviews on a few movies because they called it brigading? I think one was girl Ghostbusters?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

They have been playing fast and loose with who qualifies as a professional reviewer allowing for increased manipulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Who would've thought that this was happening on a site with often massive disparities between Critic and Public reviews, almost always related to content with big marketing budgets.

[–] Four_lights77@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The user reviews are where it’s at on rotten tomatoes. The critic reviews have been kinda suspect for a while.

[–] neonspool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

the critic reviews have always been complete dogshit. too many movies get 100% or 0% on rotten tomatoes.

if i'm not mistaken IMDB ratings are only user based, and in my opinion, i almost never disagree with IMDB ratings and i think it's because it has a vastly larger voting group to get a more accurate viewer consensus even if a small number of critics give a 0/10 or 10/10

Good god has the world not figured this out already? Or was it a conspiracy theory until now?

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah no shit, RT end IMDb have been review shills for years, completely worthless

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yeah, I've seen it too. Anybody got good suggestions for alternatives?

[–] artsii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Check out Letterboxd. But the star rating system is used a bit differently than you might be used to, like an average move will get a 3/5 stars, and that’s not a “bad” score. Just took me a bit getting used to

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Uncovered? I thought it was public knowledge for years.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I always just assumed that the badly rated ones might be legit but that the higher ones may have had a few bought off critics (because capitalism) here and there, but now I know I'm right.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Anybody who hasn't noticed the change in recent years hasn't been paying attention.

[–] Naatan@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Movie / TV reviews are such a shit show. I rarely find myself agreeing with the averaged out rating.

These days I’ll just make sure the rating is above say 30 and beyond that I’ll rely on trailers and reading actual reviews. But finding new movies and tv shows to watch is quite a chore as a result.

I hope someday soon AI can be employed to give you real personalized recommendations that don’t suck. But realistically it’ll just be more shitty algorithms meant to serve the interests of the highest bidder.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is why I liked rotten tomatoes, it separates the critics scores from the audience scores.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›