this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
459 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

57304 readers
6423 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 135 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Some things just shouldn't be connected to the internet.

[–] BurntPunk@kbin.social 107 points 11 months ago (1 children)

~~Some~~ MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.

FTFY

[–] Downcount@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things just should~~n’t~~ be connected to the internet.

IFTTT

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things just shouldn’t be ~~connected~~ ~~to~~ ~~the~~ ~~internet.~~

[–] TheYear2525@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Checks out. All suffering is caused by being.

[–] CluelessDude@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things ~~just~~ ~~shouldn’t~~ ~~be~~ ~~connected~~ ~~to~~ ~~the~~ ~~internet.~~

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 24 points 11 months ago

Apparently I'm one of those things. Jesus, what an article

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden... and therefore alluring.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 13 points 11 months ago

...provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.

Lol ha ha

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

A piece of internet history. So glad it's been preserved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExplosiveLynx@lemmy.world 125 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Example #4363 why making everything "smart" is a terrible fucking idea

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Not inherently, they coulda followed best practices. But this is definitely a reason not to buy smart things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nxfsi@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago

We live in the weirdest timeline

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it's more of a service.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That would be non-consensual.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 48 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,

10,000 users‽

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Rule 34 extends to action as well as observance.

[–] Sdnimm543@slrpnk.net 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'll be honest, not the worst possible issue with a smart chastity cage that I could think of.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is when I lock your shit remotely and then change the password

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 11 months ago (3 children)

TFW chinese hackers hold your dick for ransom until you send them crypto

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

At least someone other than me is holding my dick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iByteABit@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your cock is mine now

I'm dying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 38 points 11 months ago

This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.

[–] BastianAI@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And to think I don't even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.

He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.

[REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.

“Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.

In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.

In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.


The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, no, no, no. No. Surely the hacker knows the victim probably did not see that comment as a threat 😭

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sign up for the cage, get a bonus dom!

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 26 points 11 months ago

The chastity belt may be smart, but the maker never claimed to be so.

[–] dion_starfire@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If this is the same one I remember from a couple years back, what's not listed in this article: two different security teams warned them of the vulnerabilities multiple times, the vendor claimed to have fixed the issue when they hadn't, the devices didn't have any sort of physical bypass in case of malfunction, and what finally convinced the pen testers to go public was the company announcing that they planned to make a locking inflatable butt plug using the same platform.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

At some point the security vulnerabilities are a feature, not a bug. Butt plug ransomware is the latest sex toy fad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users

[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 9 points 11 months ago

God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names

load more comments
view more: next ›