this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1086 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3709 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world 344 points 7 months ago (50 children)

Yeah but Brave? Why not Firefox or Vivaldi.

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 237 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Forgive them. They aren't used to choosing their browser yet.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 80 points 7 months ago (12 children)

They're Apple users. They aren't used to making any decisions when it comes to how their phones work

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 94 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well the Brave Twitter account is likely a bit biased toward the Brave browser. 🙂

I'm sure the others were impacted too.

Edit: Firefox installs jumped 50%.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/13/24100066/firefox-saw-an-increase-in-users-following-apples-default-browser-changes-in-the-eu

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Vivaldi is a proprietary rebranding of Chromium. Can't say I'd recommend it over (or in addition to) Firefox.

We need less forks of Chromium. Any one company (Google in this case) having total control over browser engines is dangerous, and is a big reason why the whole Apple/Safari/Webkit situation is such a big deal to begin with.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Remember kids, if it's Chromium based, it's still part of the problem. The Chromium project only exists to provide the illusion of choice. Don't let Google have the power to dictate web standards at will.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 251 points 7 months ago (25 children)

For god sakes don’t use Brave. Brave has been caught doing shady shit in the past, and the CEO is a piece of shit on top of that.

Use Firefox with privacy addons.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 76 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Vivaldi and Firefox are better choices.

PS: considering reviewing Brave again. Everyone should contribute to their source code.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 220 points 7 months ago (27 children)

Brave is garbage. It's a cryptoscam adscam browser based on Chrome. For the love of god, use Firefox (or Vivaldi if you absolutely need chromium)

[–] Clandestine@lemmy.zip 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I can't say I disagree, I've long abandoned it on my PC.

But Brave has superb AdBlocking capabilities compared to every other browser for iPhone, so I'm still using it on my phone.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] prograhammingdev@lemmy.prograhamming.com 120 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Chart is a little misleading starting at 7% instead of zero, but still a nice surge nevertheless.

[–] FatCat@lemmy.world 139 points 7 months ago (2 children)

True. Other people asked so they posted another one.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (5 children)

IMO, this makes it look even worse.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 7 months ago

That's why they started with the one they did

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 113 points 7 months ago (19 children)

That graph is trash. The baseline needs to be at zero.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That graph hurts my data scientist heart

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 79 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Brave would definitely not be my choice 😂

That is fine, as long as people have a choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean sure I guess... but brave as a browser is atrocious. I don't trust their bullshit at all.

After all who doesn't want a crypto wallet in their browser? that's the safest place for it right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 66 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Reminder that this graph does not start at zero. Still a ~(EDIT: 50)% increase.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

I've been using Firefox on my android phones for years though, I don't remember it ever being more involved then setting it as default on the popup on first launch.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 44 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Android is a fenced garden compared to the fortress that is iOS.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Still wouldn't touch Brave Browser due to their past crypto shenanigans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nikscha@feddit.de 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I hate how they cut off the graph...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

That graph looks exaggerated but this is over a few days which is crazy

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] banghida@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They are probably just trying to pump their token with these posts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

The axis is somewhat misleading. A jump from 8k to 11k installs is nothing.

Edit: just saw from the comments this is the number of installs per day so its bigger than I thought

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Misleading graph trying to make a 150% increase look like a 1000% increase.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

that's a ~40% increase looking like a 300% increase

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That doesn't surprise me, and yes it was always because of anti-competitive practices, so I'm all for more neutrality, I'll just add 2 shower thoughts:

  1. Seeing that Brave is at the top of the browser list, I wonder how many selected Brave just because it's at the top of the list and thought that this must be a good choice then, not because they actually like Brave.
  2. It's nice to have such a thing for browsers, but it would have to be expanded to other apps as well, e.g. mail client. Oh well, maybe in another 10 years or so.
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 7 months ago

I'm so glad they included a key otherwise I wouldn't know what the green line represented.

[–] ___@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I used to use brave before they were soured. Ther BAT token disappearing from my account was another nail in the coffin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›