this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
162 points (98.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54029 readers
491 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't know how much [worth is] in in running it, I have ~6,000,000 torrents in my db and I'm still using the normal trackers, plus you realise (even with the filters now in place) how much objectionable stuff is out there

*edit []

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago

What are the benefits of selfhosting such a service?
Other than the admin being able to read my search permits prompts, of course, that can be kind of mitigated by connecting through a hidden network.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what the storage requirements are.

[–] reddthat@reddthat.com 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's in the FAQ:

You should allow roughly 50GB of disk space per 10 million torrents,

[–] ryry1985@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

So ~5KB per torrent

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm interested.. 👍👍

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wanted to run it then I realized that the database would be 90% porn with a sprinkle of csam

[–] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

Not the files themselves at least