1235
Chrome got blacklisted by our IT dept because of this.
"Ads are attack vectors."
Chrome hasn't worked for months on our network due to this and was removed recently with the latest updates last week
Lfg
load more comments
(5 replies)
And mine is making the switch from Firefox to Chrome next year. I'm so fucking mad about it.
Ditto. The security department made the push because too many people were installing unapproved addons like ublock. They are mandating chrome, "for security". LMAO
The irony is that people are signing into chrome with personal gmail and leaking stuff.
You can lockdown user addons in both chrome and firefox via GPO. You can also auto install them with the same policies if you like. Both browsers have enterpise admx files available.
Your security department sounds like they are bad at their jobs.
Your security department sounds like they are bad at their jobs.
First time in corporate?
Nah. I work in the field.
Im well aware of bad security teams. Looks like they got one.
Came here to say the exact same thing. It really is amazing to me just how many IT professionals are bad at their jobs.
Tech is a boogie man to many executypes. I've seen plenty of IT pros that were in over their head but smooth enough con men. If they keep coming up with things to throw money at/trim money out of convincingly they have long and successful careers.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Respect.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Switching away from Chrome is something that is always worth repeating, but just FYI this happened last September and isn't "new". If you're on Chrome and are only just now realizing this, it's been your reality for the last 5 months.
The scary part is presenting it as a fucking privacy feature with no consequences.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The Federated Learning of Cohorts and now the Topics API are part of a plan to pitch an "alternative" tracking platform, and Google argues that there has to be a tracking alternative—you can't just not be spied on.
lmao what the fuck kind of dystopia are we living in
It'd make the world a better place, but a big company would make slightly less money, therefore it's unthinkable to even attempt it.
See also: vehicle emissions standards
load more comments
(1 replies)
So this means that the internet could have always worked fine without invasive cookies and everything they told us about it being impossible was just a lie.
Cookies serve important purposes for doing things like keeping you signed in as you navigate through multiple pages on a site.
The issue is that most parts of the internet were developed by people more interested in all the cool stuff you could do with it, and not at all concerned about the potential misuse by large multi billion dollar corporations.
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Did any user in the world want a user-tracking and ad platform baked directly into their browser? Probably not, but this is Google, and they control Chrome, and this probably still won't make people switch to Firefox."
Their idea is that is hides all the user info from advertising companies. Downside is your browser is an ad slot machine.
Which is best?
Tracked or ad machine?
I'm more surprised people aren't talking about the fact that since it's running on the client side, someone would just figure out a way to hack and block all the ads even easier.
This also further consolidates Google's advertising power. Block all their competitors from gathering the information and give them a neutered "topics list". Google still maintains every ability to allow their own products and ad platform to bypass and use the full information.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Because the entire design of it is to mathematically prevent you from having the option to hack or block the ads. THe way to get around it is to... not use chrome.
load more comments
(1 replies)
You're thinking about it the wrong way. How does this directly and noticably harm the user experience of the average user of chrome? If it doesn't then there's no incentive for them to switch.
Not everyone knows about this kind of thing or cares. Firefox has to be significantly better in obvious ways and market that to grow their market share.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
WELL I HOPE YOU FUCKS LIKE SOME WEIRD ASS PORN AND SHITPOSTS
load more comments
(5 replies)
posted in 9/7/2023, 3:35 PM
Why are we posting news from September?
OP: * Wake me up when September ends *
Nobody did. OP just woke up.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What's with Lemmy and reposting really old things?
This is the Internet Explorer of forums.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Does this only affect Chrome or all Chromium based browsers? Are Brave and Edge going to be implementing this too?
Just Chrome in this instance, as it spies for Google. Any anti ad blocking features go though to all chromium based browsers and it is better to switch Firefox. If that browser disappears we won't have a good alternative anymore.
It is better to switch to Firefox. But chromium forks can generally do whatever they want, it's just a matter of maintenance burden. e.g. nothing is stopping a Chromium fork like Brave from running a manifest v2 compatible appstore, but it'll cost money to make, maintain, and operate, plus you have less discoverability as an app developer when using a smaller app store.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Just Chrome
load more comments
(2 replies)
All google products are spyware. Although technically they should be called "trackingware".
Duck duck go has become a pretty good viable alternative to google using it full time now.
I’ve been using it as my main search engine for around a year now. I accidentally used google today to look up “best screwdriver sets” and the results were all ads instead of results with screwdriver set reviews. I put the same thing in DuckDuckGo and immediately got relevant results.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(11 replies)
Another beautiful day of ditching chrome for Firefox a long time ago
load more comments
(5 replies)
It's also already built into Google Play Services. Remember this when they claim a monopoly is good for "security" reasons.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I'm totally unable to switch from chrome, the chrome icon is really the only one that works, all others are just too hard to see
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's getting harder to remain compassionate towards people who keep using chrome.
Are you serious? You can't be compassionate toward people who use a certain browser? It's probably because they don't understand/know/care. 🤷♂️ Educate them.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
next up: every page requires shitty chrome or login with google.
then the big shrug and all continue using chrome, iphone, amazon and the other evils.
if you are using any of the above YOU are the problem.
thoughts and prayers. wasch mich, aber mach mich nicht nass.
load more comments
(3 replies)
const google = "be evil";
load more comments
(3 replies)
September news?
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1235 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
55606 readers
2522 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS