317
submitted 5 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Navy is starting to enlist individuals who didn't graduate from high school or get a GED, marking the second time in about a year that the service has opened the door to lower-performing recruits as it struggles to meet enlistment goals.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 84 points 5 months ago

Fucking pay them better instead

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 72 points 5 months ago

Also, don't start unnecessary wars based on lies.

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago

Maybe stop supporting genocide or sumfin

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

That wouldn't provide enough cannon fodder.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago

IN THE NAVY~!

You can sail the seven seas~

IN THE NAVY~!

You don't need a G.E.D.~

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 71 points 5 months ago

It's because low level enlisted is paid like shit.

And now they are recruiting from those w/o HS or GED. The people already struggling to find employement.

Poverty recruitment! Yay...

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 39 points 5 months ago

Pay wasn't my son's concern. His concern in 2016 was that Trump would be his commander in chief.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

My cousin left the navy for that exact reason. Of course, she actually had to work with Trump, so I imagine that didn’t help.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 44 points 5 months ago

Gosh, maybe no one wants to support the military industrial complex, since we aren’t getting the American dream anymore.

[-] voxelastronaut@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Their recruitment ads are getting laughably desperate, too--all crazy CGI and sci-fi fantasies aimed at gullible COD nerds. They almost got me (poor kid straight out of high school, I was vulnerable) and haven't stopped chasing me ever since. It's been like 8 years and I still get recruitment material targeted at me, somehow--one of them even texted me like a year or two ago.

Maybe if they paid better, took better care of veterans, and weren't part of a bloodthirsty genocide machine slaughtering innocent people, they wouldn't be having so much trouble.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I guess it's going to take more than a Top Gun sequel.

[-] stufkes@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

This seems the right place to post this lecture on "Macnamaras morons". Young men with intellectual disabilities that were drafted to fight in Vietnam. Absolutely disgusting policy and heartbreaking for the families and the drafted men.

https://youtu.be/_J2VwFDV4-g?si=qTtvTDDUgBIgFmVy

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Plus a disaster for the army. It reduced its effective force because most of the men drafted with disabilities required a full time buddy to navigate most simple tasks. Literally it failed in every way possible.

[-] stufkes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, this is covered in the talk as well. In one example, an officer is killed by a macnamara man because he couldn't tell him apart from the enemy, and another where a soldier couldn't grasp the concept of throwing a grenade in a parabola over an obstacle rather than straight ahead.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You want a high number of quality employees? Stop reducing the standards and start increasing pay.

Full fucking stop.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Also, stop making Americans kill innocent civilians in poor countries.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

People are a lot more likely to sign up if there's no risk of actual fighting happening. With Ukraine/Russia and Israel/Palestine and potentially China/Taiwan soon I'm not surprised people are reluctant to join.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 15 points 5 months ago

Joining the military seems much less attractive for people when your country have been fighting in foreign countries for 16 of the last 18 years of your life… who knew?

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

And if the country in question didn't openly shit on veterans (From a government policy standpoint not the actual populace).

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Have they tried subliminal, liminal, and superluminal recruitment?

[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Yvan eht nioj

[-] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.de 14 points 5 months ago

Yvan eht Nioj!!

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Standards Aweigh, my boys, Standards Aweigh!

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Surely this will not cause reliability and readiness issues over the next decade.

[-] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 5 points 5 months ago
[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Oh for sure, that what the Navy needed when I was in. More shitbags.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes, the pay is shit, but the benefits are stunning. And it's not like you have to pay for the things a civilian does. Tons of free shit. Start at 18, hang in 20-years, and you're fucking set at 38 years old.

Imagine that. 38-yo, pulling retirement for life, and right at your prime. Best friend in high school joined the Army. Did however many years (single digit), spent the rest in the Guard. Basically fucked off at 39, started consulting for the DoD and fixes/collects classic cars for kicks. He mainly works to finance his hobbies and to stave off boredom. We're 53 this year.

My wife is Filipina, all those girls married military guys. There's a total of 2 of us in the whole gang that never served. Those guys are long retired and riding high.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
317 points (98.5% liked)

News

21676 readers
3021 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS