[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Google fucking up its detection algorithm is kind of a different issue though, isn't it?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

I see, so you think my daughter has an incestuous relationship with me and she is at least half genetically defective.

You would say that to a 14-year-old girl?

And you called me the child abuser?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

I promise I won’t tell anyone about your child porn collection. Its okay you don’t have to worry.

I see. Then you're fine with child pornography.

I also sincerely believe you are just an idiot, rather than a pedophile

So the multiple times you accused me of having a child pornography collections were lies? What a horrible thing to lie about, my teenage daughter having pornographic photos of her as a child. Why would you say that about a teenage girl?

I wonder if you would tell her that to her face and then say, "actually, I just think you are the child of an idiot?"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

Although I'm guessing places like the Elk's Lodge still take money at the door.

I wonder if they sometimes operate like Uber Eats where they buy the ticket on your behalf and charge you a premium for it even if they don't have a deal with the venue?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 45 minutes ago

No shit. He's been pro-police for years.

You know what he hasn't done? Pledged to be a dictator.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Good faith or not, you made a claim that I am abusing my daughter and have a collection of child porn. Your claims, not mine.

So if you do not contact anyone over it, you are enabling and endorsing child abuse and child porn. Based on your claims. Whether or not my replies are in good faith have no bearing on your belief, if it is sincere, that I possess child pornography.

Either you want to do something to stop someone you know has child pornography or you don't.

You don't.

So I guess you're okay with it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

Nope, I'm replying to you in both threads, but you claimed I have a child porn collection, so I am waiting for you to do something about it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

I'm not making a joke. If I have a child porn collection, it is your duty to contact authorities about it. Otherwise, you are enabling my child abuse.

Will you do so?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

I thought you said it was my child porn collection. Make up your mind. Also, are you going to contact lemmy.world admin?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Are you now accusing me of having a child porn collection? That is a very serious accusation. You definitely should contact lemmy.world admin right away. They have my contact information because I've given it to them as a moderator, so they can call the police.

You will do that, right? Because of my child abuse and child porn collection? You're not just all talk, are you?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

No one paused anything. My wife gave my mother-in-law a camera and she took a picture because my wife asked her to. Then we sent that picture to my father and my mother who was on a layover in an airport.

I assume no one masturbated to it.

And who is featuring them? Certainly not me. Have I shown them to you? No. And i wouldn't.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Okay, well someone else claimed that they did have that trauma and I don't disbelieve them. I would have had a more substantive response to their post, but they decided to accuse me of child abuse.

Edit: and now, they are saying I have a child porn collection. So I'm not sure I believe their claim at this point either.

374
202
295
108
831
Happily ever after. (lemmy.world)
504
161

As a big fan of both Clue and Fernwood 2 Night, this one hit hard.

910
Zoinks! (lemmy.world)
110
88

The library and its 27 branches continue to struggle through a ransomware attack that has disabled its networks, rendered its hundreds of public computers useless and turned its normal operations upside down.

Book checkouts are being done by spreadsheet. Column A: the library user’s account number. Column B: the book’s bar code number. The low-tech inventory will be integrated with the library’s normal account system at some future, unknown date.

With its computer networks down, the library has no way to check books back into its system, making it more convenient for everyone if you just hold onto your books for a little while. In normal times, the library says it loans out more than 1.1 million books and other items each month.

You can search the library’s catalog, but only from home, or from your phone, not from any of the computer terminals in libraries. The shutdown, which library officials have attributed to a ransomware attack, has now lingered for four weeks, with no solid estimate on when full library services may return.

The downtown library’s fifth-floor computer lab — often the most crowded space in the library — is empty. Dozens of computers, normally available for free to anyone who walks in, sit idle, cordoned off as if physically infected, rather than just virtually. Bringing your own computer won’t help: Wi-Fi networks are down too. (I initially sat down in the Greenwood library to write this story about the library’s broken computer network, before remembering that I couldn’t work there because the library’s computer network was broken.)

Bypass paywall: https://archive.is/yVa8c

Demanding a ransom from a public library system- people can be such scum.

344
74
Neither? (lemmy.world)
view more: next ›

FlyingSquid

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF