this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
575 points (97.1% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2109 readers
1 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah sure, Elon totally intentionally obliterated his own image among progressives and liberals to prevent another Arab spring because he is a very stable 10D chess master who’s always a trillion steps ahead…

Nothing was intentional. He has no clue. He bought Twitter because he’s a pissy little man-baby on adderall who can’t keep his mouth shut.

And he’s ruining everything because he has no idea what he’s doing and he fired the persons who knew.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely believe he got into the situation as an idiot. But he didn’t purchase twitter 100% by himself. I think his financial backers absolutely intended to destroy twitter. Or at least sabotage its ability to spread free speech.

[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think you are absolutely right.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard this a lot, but there is one flaw in it. It assumes Elon musk is actually smart. That guy is really fucking dumb.

Or he is a stooge being used by others who want to see Twitter fail

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh no, it was intentional on the part of the SA and foreign backers. Elon is the scape goat. They bought it for the man-sized rich toddler and let nature take its course. Can you think of someone less reliable to put in charge of Twitter to cause it to crash and burn?

Kanye West and Donald Trump were both too busy.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But if twitter dies something takes it's place, be it threads or the fediverse. What a waste of 44 billion

[–] youstolemyname@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fediverse is very fragmented and threads isn't taking off

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think many fediverse users want to repeat the same mistakes of X/Twitter.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

because of federation, fragmentation isn't a thing

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, the shareholders of all of his other companies let him stick around. Are the shareholders of Tesla in on some plan to watch him decimate the value of their investments? At best, they're being held hostage by the impact of him throwing a fit and liquidating his massive personal holdings.

I think the market is just trying to figure out how divorce him knowing how much damage he could do on his way out

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The Muskovite purchasing Xitter ("X" being "sh" like in Chinese "xiao") took Xitter private. It's not "the market," it's "a handful of private investors." Not trying to play semantic games but Xitter's investors are not representative of an open market.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Why do we continue to give dictators and billionaires the benefit of the doubt all the time?

[–] Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He might not be competent, but his high level investors are.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I can tell, he has some level of technical competence, more in engineering than in software, and basically not at all with people. I'm not sure if he has a neurodivergence in the area that prevents him from acquiring an understanding of people, or if he basically regards other humans as objects to be shifted around in bulk, and thus not worth considering, but his career demonstrates both him fucking up socially, and him being played by people who want something from him.

[–] SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

He does not have any level of technical competence.

He understands cars or rockets the way a kid who is really into models does: he can tell you dimensions, horsepower, or payload capacity. He can't apply any of that knowledge - they're just memorized stats to him. When you get him talking about what those stats mean, he makes stuff the fuck up based on the reaction of the room. He's getting sued for it right now... Again

He tries to make it sound like he's this flawed genius with a grand plan to save humanity, but he's just a billionaire who loves collecting futuristic looking toys to brag about

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Don't be so sure. Now I still don't think he's some 4D chess player. But even stupid people with too many resources can form stupid conspiracies.