this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
129 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
58092 readers
3882 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When Windows 10 launched, wasn't it said that this would be the "last" version of Windows and it would just get continually updated?
Yeah but then Apple dropped their longstanding practice of naming MacOS releases 10.x and went to MacOS 11 and if there's one thing that Microsoft can never resist it's copying Apple.
Yep, and that lasted all of about a year I think before MS backtracked on it. Microsoft has an MO, they release a bad version of Windows which everyone hates, then they remove/fix most of the things people hate and release a good version of Windows, then they get cocky and cram a bunch of stuff people hate into the next version and the cycle repeats. Right now we're on the "everyone hates it" part of the cycle with Windows 11 where they crammed ads, tracking, and a mandatory MS account sign-in into it.
I'm expecting Windows 12 (or whatever they end up calling it, probably not 12 as that would be sane), to bring back offline accounts, remove the ads, and at least tone down the tracking, but that will only happen after enough people refuse to "upgrade" off of 10.
Alternatively they could go the XP route and release essentially Windows 11 SP2, which rips all the garbage out and makes it not suck, but I think that's less likely.
W11 still has local account.
From what I recall last I looked into this, that's technically true but there were a couple gotchas. I can't remember exactly but it was either that it's a major PITA to setup during install (deeply buried in a very non-obvious location), or else that you had to use a MS account to install, but once installed you could then make and use a local account. In either case it's very clear MS is doing everything they can to force you into using their online accounts. I wouldn't be surprised if they remove the ability to activate Windows 11 without using a MS account soon if they haven't already.
No you can just put in a blocked email and then it prompts you to make a local account
What constitutes a blocked email?
No. This was one engineer that said that en everyone ran with it. Microsoft officially never said this
Because everyone wanted it to be true. Everyone wanted to just have stability and no more radical interface changes.