this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
576 points (86.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29209 readers
970 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 130 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah but some people are more traffic than others.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

insert lifted truck hogging 2 lanes

insert soccer moms with massive SUVs

Lol

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Insert the guy in a Prius going 30 mph under the speed limit and slamming on his brakes for no reason.

Insert everyone in the passing lane that isn't passing.

[–] Khotetsu@lib.lgbt 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is this "passing lane" of which you speak? All I've ever seen in America is the fast lane and the slow lane(s).

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The left lane is supposed to be for passing only.

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And if everyone wasn't so fucking slow it could just be the passing lane.

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And passing is still according to the speed limit.

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's really not. If you're driving the speed limit in the left lane when you could practically be in any other lane you're an asshole. What you're doing is legal, but you're still a dick.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Okay, so only use the left lane when you're passing. Speed limit has nothing to do with it.

[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Nope. You see there are two realities. One where the DOT exists and they write traffic laws for. Then there's the reality the rest of us are living in. Cops are not behind every bush or blade of grass so adherence to the rules is an optional behaviour.

People dogmatically sticking to the speed limit while there's a line of cars behind them are the worst type of narcissistic asshole. Even if they don't want to speed, they can pull over and let the rest of us pass them. But they don't. Because that would mean feeling shame and they have none.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mfs hitting they brakes because they TAPPED the speed limit and dont want to go over

And all these far lane fucks that hold up an entire line of traffic because they want to pull into the far lane and can't comprehend using the close lane to pick up speed to just get over

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly “soccer mom” is probably a better use of street capacity than most usage of cars. One adult and six kids in a Suburban is much more efficient than three adults each with two kids in the back of three sedans.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but the vehicle in all likelihood was purchased out of "fuck you i'm rich/leveraged to the tits, I deserve a gas guzzler the likes of which Mansa Musa would find ostentatious" mentality.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While it’s probably true that most oversized SUVs are owned by people that don’t need them, “soccer mom” specifically refers to someone that would need that space, since they’re the one that drives their kids (and their friends) to and from soccer practice.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's insane that anyone needs to drive their kids on a regular basis (unless they actually live rurally) though

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's insane that anyone needs to drive their kids on a regular basis

I take it you didn’t have a very active childhood.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

kids here get around mostly by e-scooter/bike or bus, though obviously not e-scooters before a couple years ago.

It's so much nicer for everyone, the kids get freedom and to hang out with their friends while travelling, parents save money and time by not driving needlessly, and everyone else gets fewer cars on the road.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Most “soccer moms” only transporting a couple times a week at max capacity. Rest of the time it’s solo travel between work/groceries/“me time”. 💀

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even though your downvotes pale in comparison to your upvotes, who tf can disagree with this statement?

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

🚘 🧠 people, I guess. Most people are just born/live in areas where it’s nearly impossible to get around their area that’s not by a personal vehicle.

Getting groceries? Hop in the truck/SUV, drive 5+ miles to grocery store

Want to eat out? Hop into the SUV/truck, drive 10+ miles to restaurant

Visit friends? Hop into the SUV/truck, drive 10+ mi to friends house in the exurbs (and they already live in the suburbs 💀)

Going to work? Hop into the SUV/truck, drive 20+ mi to work.

Going to the bars? Call a rideshare, pay $50+ for one ride, get drunk. Most people probably think they can still drive while under the influence and get home safe.

Only describing 1-way travel, by the way.

These people trying to imagine there’s a more scalable and safer way to transport people is a foreign concept in their mind — despite the rest of the planet figuring out how to properly move people.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you swerve in and out of lanes to try to get ahead, you can be traffic for an easy 3 or 4 lanes!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Love the peeps that risk killing everyone around them to get ten feet ahead in bumper to bumper traffic.

[–] Khotetsu@lib.lgbt 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And only end up being farther back than if they had just stayed put, as everybody else had the same thought, making the new lane the slower one.

And even if it doesn't, they lose any time they could have possibly gained the moment they get off the highway and hit a red light.

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

90% of the time the bumper to bumper traffic only exists because some fuck taps their breaks every 15 seconds

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If everyone was to the right like they should be these idiots wouldn't be able to weave in and out to get ahead.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I'm stuck in rush-hour traffic on a 65mph limit interstate going 5 miles an hour in the left lane, I'll be God damned if I'm going to move over to the right lane so someone can pass me. An emergency vehicle? Sure. But some asshat that is swerving in and out of every lane just to try to get a few cars ahead? Fuck 'em.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If by stuck you mean there is a car in front of you preventing you from passing then that's fine but there's someone way up at the front of that who's not passing like they're supposed to that's causing the whole mess in the first place. My comment was directed at them.

[–] Agent_of_Kayos@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More likely, wayyyy at the head is the chokepoint in the infrastructure that is making everyone try to get over at the same time and causing a build up of traffic behind them.

Yes, sometimes it is idiotic drivers, but I find more often than not it is the engineers or the limits of the area the road is built in that add chokepoints that fuck everything over.

"Oh. Everyone wants to take this exit? Make it a short one lane into a red light. That won't fuck over the highway"

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It's amazing how much a little natural geography can completely fuck up traffic. There's a spot in Denver where I-25 shifts slightly, maybe 5 degrees. But I'll be damned if that tiny little change in direction isn't enough to make someone going the speed limit tap their brakes just for a second. Rippled over thousands of cars during rush hour, it creates a bottle neck almost every single day at that exact spot. I'm sure planning an interstate is a nightmare of a task, just knowing that even the slightest deviation from absolutely straight is going to fuck everything up for decades.