The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness.

The boots theory is timeless

As someone with shit income but a nice savings buffer, holy shit it makes things so easy, compared. "Cool dress, I'll get that for next summer - cool coat, I'll get that for next winter", no problem. Just got my cat's meds for the next 4 months at a sale, and the next sale should be in that time. Also could get her thyroid radiotherapy, that's already paid for itself (compared to permanent expensive meds, of course not compared to no treatment). Appliance starting to make a noise or performance dropping, time to add that to my second hand watch list and keep an eye on sales of quality brands, rather than being forced to risk it failing and then getting something in a hurry, possibly on some payment scheme with a high interest rate. Pantry items on sale and/or in bulk. And of course the kind of main shoes that have held up for 5+ years, just could use a resoling soon.

I can't even imagine the constant stress living without it would be. Ow. :/

For real though, the more money you have the more discounts and gifts you get. And then they'll complain about some food helps.