this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
558 points (98.3% liked)
Microblog Memes
6351 readers
2678 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's that time they tried to do a counter-revolution in Cuba in 2016, the whole using a USAID-administered vaccination program to find Osama Bin Laden, causing a backlash against vaccines, that time the USAID pier in Gaza had a humanitarian aid truck filled with Israeli soldiers proceed to kill nearly 300 people, with air support.
Alright so hold on, USAID is not equipped to stop the Israeli military. So that's right out. And the vaccination ruse was a CIA operation.
It is interesting to see that USAID has an office meant to react to rapidly changing political situations. But there are several things about the Cuban Internet story. First, obviously it's not torture and similar stupid stuff. Second, from the article it looks like it was never properly authorized and was beyond what USAID is meant to do.
The point I was illustrating is that USAID is and always was a tool of the CIA.
USAID is absolutely equipped to tell the Israeli military "We're not going to give you one of our trucks and a landing pad for a blackhawk at our pier".
How are they equipped to do that? Are you going to stand there in the way of an army with your clipboard?
And I'm sorry but Internet access and social media doesn't evoke scary secret agent the way you're trying to use it. At best it's the furthest extent of soft power, which is USAID's purpose. At worst it's an unsanctioned covert program that got shut down and swept under the rug.
Yes, they are equipped to not hand over their resources. They're also equipped to not lie and cover it up afterwords.
Okay so a few things here. USAID wasn't even on that side of the delivery system, that was WFP. Far from covering it up, the raid was headline news and is covered in an OIG report on the pier. Finally, USAID is not a military organization. If a military unit lands near them and demands a truck they are going to hand it over. They do not possess weapons or training. This entire line of argument is ridiculous.
USAID also provides funding to failed coup orchestrators like Juan guaido
Wow, you really shot yourself in the foot there
The entire Western world maintains that he won that election. So we're going to disagree on that right away. Then if you read what it was for it's literally aid funds not weapons or such. Then it's not even flowing through Guaido, but local NGOs instead.
You may want to read the articles you use as sources before using them.
Guaido boycotted the election btw and declared himself the winner with no votes
Oh, you're a neoliberal, that explains a lot. I guess you wont care about any actions that override another countries Democratic process when its funneled through NGOs or provides America a strategic advantage.
Condescending conservatives who are naive enough to take the most milquetoast yahoo news explanation at face value are not going to be worth discussion, because yalls politics actually align with USAids mission plan.
Wow that's quite a leap. You're the one who brought a Yahoo news article to the discussion. Now it's not to be trusted? So bring one you do trust. And the entire point is that we are trying to respect the democratic process in Venezuela. Saying I have the army so I win is not a democratic process.
Lets put it this way, If yahoo admits USAID is leveraging its funding to support a coup, it certainly is. The media all has a bias, whether its ap or BBC or aljazeera. I dont consume any of them uncritically.
Sure, except the article didn't say that.