this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
661 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
4557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viking@infosec.pub 73 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While the company stops short of directly saying as much, it sure feels like the preposterously long ads we’re seeing here are an example of one tool in Google’s arsenal for effectively disabling YouTube playback for violators of the site’s ToS.

I don't get it. When my adblocker works, I don't get to see this shit. Only if it fails I'llbe confronted with hour-long ads, so the incentive to find a better blocker is even higher?

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They are trying hard to block all known adblockers. And if they ever do, this will become a serious problem.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It won't, I'll just go do something else with my free time...

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So they effectively blocked the video then?

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

No, they just set the bar for watching it too high for my liking.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Arms races are rarely won by anyone.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They are won by arms dealers.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I'm kind of okay with it

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc.

No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the "good" its brought him

But that seems to be the world that google wants.

[–] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Remember when Google aquired YouTube and stated they didn't intend to change anything? Remember when the only ads were those little banners you had to close? We've come such a long ways from where we started and what is considered "sane" these days would have been an affront back then. Google truly did slow boil the frog.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free.

That's an excellent Maxim.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is a war that was fought by broadcast TV and the makers of videotapes, DVDs, and blu-rays. In every case the Corpos failed. So no, this arms race is and will be won by the ad blockers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except all of those formats are now obsolete, no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore, and people have moved on to others. So did they fail or did they just find a different method? I'd say the latter. How many people do you know with a working VCR at this point?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore

Uh, yes they are. What are you smoking? They even still make DVD's and straight DVD players. They even still make VCR's.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/

Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock.