this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
518 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60033 readers
2864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OpenSourcing is a good move

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 29 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

What is "trying to" open source though? Make the GitHub repo public, include the database schema, and you're done.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

They might rely on parts that have non open sourced drivers or firmware. Perhaps different parts of the code were authored by different people and they need everyone approval.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 65 points 22 hours ago

Likely they have proprietary or otherwise private information they want to clean out first, or they want to make it more presentable or documented.

I agree I'm not a fan of the "trying to" phrasing either.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 68 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Startups like this aren’t known for their robust infrastructure design.

It’s most likely running on some weird unicorn setups no-one has bothered to document.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

With passwords in the code and such.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 43 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Fear of embarrassing code is often a factor too. Amazing how coding standards instantly improve across the board the moment you realize people outside of dev might be scrutinizing what you've been shipping to customers.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is true even for my personal projects lol

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a programmer but dabble. I'm always so nervous when actual programmers look at my code.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

True programmers know that novice code is a rite of passage. Every programmer worth their salt looks at their own older code and cringes at it. Most people who do this for a living are more likely to give helpful pointers rather than tear you down, if anything.

If someone is being a jerk to you about your code, stop listening to them immediately and walk away or block them.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

yep, do this all the time with my own code... even for yesterdays code prior to second coffee time!

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

This guy codes.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

These guys are out of business anyway. They don't have to care; they can just dump whatever they have somewhere and scuttle off into the night, never to be seen again, nothing more than an echoing "woop woop woop woop" fading off into the distance.

They've been handed a rare and highly valuable treasure. They get all the good will from the community for doing the one thing that everyone always wants these companies to do but never happens, and this is now someone else's problem.

If you're going to have a problem, someone else's problem is the best kind to have.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

Probably a lot of stolen code

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Definitely missing documentation to make it a proper repo

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah it's so simple, no way they could be the good guys, can't have that.